Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Landrieu fall 4 Points Short of Outright Win in LA Senate Election
The Shreveport Times | 11-06-02 | Hill, John

Posted on 11/06/2002 5:33:52 AM PST by Theodore R.

Landrieu vs. Terrell Louisiana voters to make final decision in Dec. 7 runoff; balance of power in U.S. Senate remains uncertain

John Hill / Louisiana Gannett News Posted on November 6, 2002

BATON ROUGE - Sounding themes likely to be heard in their runoff campaigns, Democratic U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu and Republican state Elections Commissioner Suzanne Haik Terrell greeted supporters ready for one last month of campaigning.

Landrieu spoke from her election night party at the Fairmont Hotel in New Orleans shortly after 10 p.m. when she acknowledged Louisiana's U.S Senate race appeared headed to a runoff. Terrell, appearing from the Sheraton in Baton Rouge, said she was ready to hit the road this morning to fight what is expected to be a close race.

What remained unclear into the night Tuesday was what role Louisiana's runoff will play in the balance of power in the Senate. Several races remained too close to call as of press time and it may be days before some results are finalized. Early indications showed, however, that most seats stayed with their party, meaning Louisi-ana's Dec. 7 runoff election could be the deciding factor in the Republican-Democrat balance of power in the nation's upper chamber.

Either way, millions of dollars are expected to pour into the state during the next month as the national parties focus their attention here.

"This is economic development," said U.S. Sen. John Breaux, who predicted as much as $15 million could be spent on the runoff race.

Landrieu, who had 46 percent of the vote, according to complete but unofficial results, told her supporters she was proud of her campaign and ready to hit the ground running today.

We ran "on real issues that count," Landrieu said.

"Louisiana does not need a rubber stamp, we need a senator," she said referring to Terrell's support of President George W. Bush. "When the president is right, we say OK. When he's not we go our own way."

A jubilant Terrell - who had 27 percent of the vote unofficially - wished Landrieu "good luck" and thanked her Republican opponents U.S. Rep. John Cooksey and state Rep. Tony Perkins.

"We are so optimistic not just about tonight but about our future. The people of Louisiana have crossed party lines, they crossed racial lines, and they heard our message," Terrell said. "I look forward to engaging (Landrieu) from Shreveport to Grand Isle, city by city, town by town, person by person. Tomorrow, we're going to go out and win this thing."

Cooksey, with 14 percent of the vote, trailed Terrell.

"What happened was Suzie and Mary ran negative campaigns and Suzie basically became the anti-Mary vote," Cooksey said from Monroe on Tuesday night.

At the time of his comment, Cooksey had not conceded the other runoff spot to Terrell. However, later in the night, Terrell said she had spoken with Cooksey, who pledged his support to her.

Perkins, who said earlier in the day that his campaign had gained steam, came in third with 10 percent of the vote.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dec7; la; landrieu; senate; terrell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
LA Democrats do vote in so-called "runoffs." Actually, Dec. 7 will be the "general election" for senator. Nov. 5 was actually the LA Senate "primary." Terrell should be able to appeal to most of the Cooksey and Perkins supporters. Perhaps James Carville will remove the trash can from his head and return "home" to New Orleans and take over Landrieu's campaign, the way he did for Harris Wofford of PA 11 years ago! If elected, Terrell would be the first Republican senator from LA since Reconstruction.
1 posted on 11/06/2002 5:33:52 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
I'm donating money to Terrell. We need this seat given that the DemonCraps are stealing South Dakota, for a margin of comfort.

http://www.suzieterrell.com/donations.html
2 posted on 11/06/2002 6:02:18 AM PST by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Using Fox News' numbers, with 98% of the precincts reporting in Louisiana, Demonrats have 586583 votes, Republicans have 611406 votes, and all others have 16705 votes. I'd look for this to be added to the Republican side of the isle after December 7.
3 posted on 11/06/2002 6:04:49 AM PST by Conservative_Rob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk; JohnHuang2; KQQL; eureka!; Dales; GraniteStateConservative
I'll be donating as well, and I urge others to do the same. We've got the big MO right now and need to capitalize on it!
4 posted on 11/06/2002 6:27:45 AM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
I don't understand why there is a feeling that Landrieu will lose in the runoff - she has a clear majority, now?
5 posted on 11/06/2002 6:28:58 AM PST by Nephi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Coop, we outraised the Democraps before we were in control. Terrell will be able to wipe her ass with hundred-dollar-bills for this run-off.

Every big donor will pour money into her campaign.
6 posted on 11/06/2002 7:13:49 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nephi
How can you have a majority with 46% of the votes?
7 posted on 11/06/2002 7:18:44 AM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Yep. And every little bit counts. This is a chance for a two-vote swing. Gotta jump on it!
8 posted on 11/06/2002 7:22:46 AM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad
Try to keep up. Landrieu's nearest competitor has only 26%. I'm trying to understand why Republicans are so hopeful about this race.
9 posted on 11/06/2002 7:35:50 AM PST by Nephi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nephi
Because there were 3 Republican candidates running against Landrieu. Now there will be only one in the runoff. Runoff elections usually favor Republicans on voter turnout.
10 posted on 11/06/2002 7:40:37 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nephi; Hillarys Gate Cult
Because there were 3 Republican candidates running against Landrieu. Now there will be only one in the runoff. Runoff elections usually favor Republicans on voter turnout.

And because Mary will be asking Louisiana to send her to the Senate to be in the minority-- a tough sell.

11 posted on 11/06/2002 7:57:07 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nephi
There were nine candidates in this race.... two democrats, 4 republicans and 3 independents.... It depends upon how the support breaks out during the Dec. 7 race. This race will get national attention and tons of money from both parties. Look for the major players from both parties to be in the state multiple times...



U. S. Senator
3,912 of 3,912 precincts reporting
Click here for Results by Parish
23,776 2% Raymond Brown -
171,706 14% John Cooksey -
572,679 46% Mary Landrieu -
10,426 1% Patrick E. "Live Wire" Landry -
3,865 0% James Lemann -
119,765 10% "Tony" Perkins -
2,614 0% Gary D. Robbins -
1,668 0% Ernest Edward Skillman, Jr. -
339,163 27% Suzanne Haik Terrell -

12 posted on 11/06/2002 10:11:37 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nephi
Try to keep up. Landrieu's nearest competitor has only 26%. I'm trying to understand why Republicans are so hopeful about this race.

This ain't rocket science... approximately 54% of the voters cast their ballots AGAINST Landrieu. I'll have to see final voter turnout numbers, parish by parish, so say whether the Republicans will muster a better showing on Pearl Harbor Day. The weather helped them a bit yesterday, so it could go either way. Landrieu is far from having it in the bag; it depends on how effective the GOP is at bringing the supporters of *all* of the Republican candidates together behind Terrell.

13 posted on 11/06/2002 10:24:36 AM PST by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
http://www.sec.state.la.us/cgibin?rqstyp=elcmp&rqsdta=11050214012601

Parish by parish results
14 posted on 11/06/2002 10:50:07 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Conservative_Rob
I wouldn't assume Terrell will get all the Republican votes.

In Louisana you more often vote against someone than for someone as all the candidates they put up are assumed to be crooks. And more often than not you are proven right.

The election system is designed to keep incumbents in office by splitting the oponents vote. The only way around that is to vote against the incumbent to get down to a two person election and then vote for the one you really wanted. Just because someone voted for Terrell on 11/5 doesn't mean they will vote for her on 12/7. Forcing a runoff is an insurance policy to see how the other races came out across the nation first, then deciding.

15 posted on 11/06/2002 11:03:41 AM PST by oldcomputerguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
This ain't rocket science... approximately 54% of the voters cast their ballots AGAINST Landrieu.

Apparently, it is. Applying your reasoning, 74% of voters voted against the nearest Republican candidate. I'm asking because I'm sure some freepers familiar with the process in Louisiana can explain why Republicans are so hopeful.

16 posted on 11/06/2002 11:52:28 AM PST by Nephi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nephi
I think Louisiana Republicans are hopeful because in this election, their vote was split three ways. I read up on the candidates and listened to what they had to say, and Terrell, Cooksey, and Perkins were pretty much tied in my eyes. I decided to vote for Terrell, but I would have had no problem voting for the other candidates had they made it to the runoff. Most people I know feel the same way. I don't see Landrieu getting a large amount of Cooksey/Perkins votes. Anyone who voted for either of these candidates wanted to send Mary packing.
17 posted on 11/06/2002 12:30:46 PM PST by lsucat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Call it what you like but in effect it's a runoff...... A General election allows all parties to have a representative in the race, but in this case it's the top two votes getters of the previous 'non partisan' primary...

How is your glass now that the Texas election is over... still 1/2 full and predicitng grand results for the Democrats and dire consequences for the Republicans? Teddy you worried too much.......

18 posted on 11/06/2002 2:21:01 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lsucat
Unfortunately our so called Republican governor, Mike Foster, just said on the radio he would not endorse either candidate. He actually said he would support the candidate that ran the cleanest race. What a ringing endorsement of Susie Terrell. With supporters like that what chance do we have? It looks like the Republicans are going to do what I feared....be happy with a one vote majority and let Landrieu have this seat. This is typical of Mike Foster. Republican in name only.
19 posted on 11/06/2002 2:26:11 PM PST by WatchOutForSnakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nephi
Applying your reasoning, 74% of voters voted against the nearest Republican candidate.

Based on observations and experience, Cooksey attracted a more staunchly conservative crowd than Terrell did - and there was no squabbling amongst the GOP candidates that would lead to some staying home in protest on Dec. 7th. The Cooksey voters will most likely turn out for Terrell, which puts Suzy and Mary in a fairly close race. Perkins, as a younger, pleasant-looking fellow, probably drew more of the soccer mom vote than did Cooksey. How that shakes out in a runoff between two women is hard to call. As far as the also-rans' 3%, I have no idea where those voters will lend their support.

We may not be able to say with confidence that Terrell will win, but it's going to be a competitive runoff. Advertising and public appearances by the political power-brokers will be important, no doubt about it. Also, as someone mentioned further up in the thread, Landrieu is now campaigning for the minority party. Terrell will make sure to point that out, many times.

This could even come down to Clinton vs. Bush, via proxy. If Clinton appears for Mary Landrieu and President Bush does likewise for Suzy Terrell, I do believe that Mary will feel "the Thud".

It's going to be *interesting*, no doubt about it.

20 posted on 11/06/2002 2:28:17 PM PST by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson