Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Top 50 Diversity Employers 2002 Rankings
THE BLACK COLLEGIAN MAGAZINE ^ | 11/12/2002

Posted on 11/12/2002 7:39:48 PM PST by John Lenin

Universum CommunicationsThe table below presents the 50 most popular employers among students surveyed by The Universum Diversity Survey 2002.The survey, which is conducted annually by the international research and consulting firm Universum Communications, monitors the employment-related opinions of undergraduate and MBA students with minority backgrounds. Over 3,500 students at 53 of the finest universities throughout the United States participated in the 2002 survey.

Universum CommunicationsFrom a list on the survey questionnaire, respondents were asked to select up to five companies as their “ideal employers,” or the companies for which they would most like to work. (They had the option of writing in two companies if their preferred employers were not already present on the list.) The data was subsequently tabulated, with the companies selected by the greatest percentage of respondents given the highest rankings on the list of minority students' ideal employers.

 

COMPANY RANKING %
Goldman Sachs 1 14.32
Merrill Lynch 2 10.42
Walt Disney 3 10.37
Microsoft 4 10.31
IBM 5 9.97
Morgan Stanley 6 9.85
McKinsey & Company 7 9.73
BMW 8 9.47
Sony 9 8.82
Coca-Cola 10 8.78
AOL Time Warner 11 8.71
JPMorganChase 12 8.63
PricewaterhouseCoopers 13 8.41
Citigroup 14 8.26
Accenture 15 7.98
The Boston Consulting Group 16 7.94
Fox Entertainment 17 7.52
General Electric 18 7.41
Ernst & Young 19 6.51
Andersen 20 6.31
Nike 21 6.12
Pfizer 22 6.08
Deloitte Consulting 23 6.05
Bank of America 24 5.88
Johnson & Johnson 25 5.66
Bain & Company 26 5.50
Dell Computer 27 5.38
Intel 28 5.23
Procter & Gamble 29 5.01
The Gap 30 4.89
Cisco Systems 31 4.85
Boeing 32 4.78
American Express 33 4.73
3M 34 4.60
Lehman Brothers 35 4.32
AT&T 36 3.95
LucasArts/LucasFilm 37 3.82
Booz-Allen Hamilton 38 3.76
Credit Suisse First Boston 39 3.75
Merck 40 3.71*
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu 41 3.71*
Abbott Laboratories 42 3.70
Charles Schwab 43 3.60
L'Oreal 44 3.57
Deutsche Bank 45 3.52
Miramax Films 46 3.51
Hewlett-Packard 47 3.46
General Motors 48 3.35
Motorola 49 3.34
Bristol-Myers Squibb 50 3.16


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Free Republic
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
Interesting survey, notice all the Financial Companys on the list.
1 posted on 11/12/2002 7:39:48 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Lenin; rohry; Dukie; arete; headsonpikes; razorback-bert; Billy_bob_bob
Here's a list of 50 stocks to short.
2 posted on 11/12/2002 7:50:09 PM PST by Tauzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tauzero
I agree.

and will repeat your remarks:

Here's a list of 50 stocks to short.


3 posted on 11/12/2002 7:51:20 PM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Trust me, nobody should think about working for Boeing.
4 posted on 11/12/2002 7:52:12 PM PST by irishtenor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: victim soul
Correction: If in this case it means diversity in including all races, I'll buy.

If it means recognition in the workplace of sexual proclivities, I will not buy.
5 posted on 11/12/2002 7:53:31 PM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Wrong1 the forgot to put the numero uno company there on top: the Gubmint!
6 posted on 11/12/2002 7:54:02 PM PST by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tauzero; victim soul
Yes, short some of the best companies in the World.
7 posted on 11/12/2002 7:54:39 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
There's a difference between a stock and the underlying company. A good company doesn't necessarily mean a good stock.
8 posted on 11/12/2002 7:57:34 PM PST by Tauzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
It's interesting, but you've got to remember it's just the opinions of people most of whom have yet to hold a full-time job. BTW, what is "Andersen" doing on there at #20? Isn't Arthur Andersen out of the accounting business after the Enron thing? And Disney at #3? Aren't they cutting back right now? Also, how many people actually work for George Lucas?

Enough questions for now :-)

9 posted on 11/12/2002 7:57:40 PM PST by TheMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Read the article, it's not about affirmitive action, it's about who the students like best to work for. No comment on the obvious racism.
10 posted on 11/12/2002 7:58:17 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Some folks here didn't read the full article. This list represents the companies minorities would LIKE to work for.

To comment that these are companies to short, is kind of, well, mean spirited and nasty.

11 posted on 11/12/2002 8:02:27 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Yes, short some of the best companies in the world.

Since this list is based on a survey of undergraduate opinion, it probably shouldn't serve as a basis for investing strategy. However, I have noticed that whenever a company itself starts making a big hoo-hah about "diversity", it's usually not long before that company's operations and stock value start to decline noticeably.

12 posted on 11/12/2002 8:03:10 PM PST by TheMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
No wonder all my Merrill-Lynch funds suck. They hire based on color and not on performance. I think I'll go sell my entire portfolio now. =)
13 posted on 11/12/2002 8:04:02 PM PST by YoungKentuckyConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: irishtenor
I interviewed for a job at Boeing (pre-9-11) and was asked several "diversity" questions during the interview. They were sufficiently wierd and pointless that I didn't even turn my job application in.
14 posted on 11/12/2002 8:04:51 PM PST by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Would appear that many minorities are studying to become stock brokers. Take it from me, the timing isn't particularly good...
15 posted on 11/12/2002 8:04:58 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Well, since this was written as a who they would LIKE to work for, I find it impressive that THAT isn't one of the top, not even in the top 20.
16 posted on 11/12/2002 8:07:37 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tauzero
Note that in this case Diversity means black only.
17 posted on 11/12/2002 8:09:15 PM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
I wish I would have never posted this artile now.
18 posted on 11/12/2002 8:13:05 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: John Lenin
Because of my comment?

I am sure Asians read THE BLACK COLLEGIAN every week or whenever it is published.


Like wise I am sure Hispannics subscribe in large numbers too.
20 posted on 11/12/2002 8:20:17 PM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson