Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

... A Sad Time (Barbra Streisand on the election)
barbrastreisand.com ^ | November 8, 2002 | Barbra Streisand

Posted on 11/13/2002 10:46:50 AM PST by mondonico

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Darth Reagan
She forgot to mention starving children and torturing puppies.

Also...restricting a womans' right to choose, rolling back civil rights, blah, blah, whatever the hell else you wanna put in there. (gimme a C, a bouncy C)

41 posted on 11/13/2002 11:08:57 AM PST by MP5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mondonico
She doesn't even know what the phrase "Lets Roll" is all about, thus her comment about Sen. Lott wanting to "roll" bills through the Senate! She says and I quote her diatribe "The Republicans are excited to, in Trent Lott's words, "roll" their agenda through the Congress." How ignorant is that?

She says we will have to live with things that are actually quite good. Being wealthy she doesn't realize that the "wealthy" she mentions who will get tax cuts are the average income people like us. That we need to make sure that people who make 500,000 dollars a year who are seniors, don't get the same benefit as someone who makes 5,000 a year. That our Foriegn policies were decimated by Clinton, and we suffered as a nation from that lack of security (IN no small part thanks to the Torrecelli Ammendment among a multitude of other Democratic agenda's, or lack of any knowledge of how to secure our nation. They UN-DID a ton of measures in order to protect criminals.. international terrorists being on the top of the list).

Now that President Bush has taken the helm, things are improving. But he inherited a HUGE mess.

She is of Jewish descent, yet she does not understand what the Israeli people are enduring. It doesn't happen to her.. so logic be damned.

She is so out of touch with reality, with the average American that she can't see past the nose on her own face (Which was already a problem for her).

Her main problem is, she isn't invited to the Whitehouse anylonger.. she doesn't have a direct line into the Oval Office. (wahhhhhh) She is as much an ego maniac as Bill Clinton and Hitlery are.

For those of us out there in the REAL world, Baghdad Babs is insignificant. Irrelevant.

A nuisance that we wish would just go awaaaaaaay!!!

Go hang you laundry out to dry Bagdad Babs!! Do what you suggest so many other "lesser" folks do. In otherwords,.. get out in the trenches with the rest of us.. maybe then you'll understand why the Dems lost. (I might add.. you being outspoken and "out there" really helped this past election "Oh wise one")

ROFLOL!! She is such a joke!!!
42 posted on 11/13/2002 11:11:11 AM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mondonico
I bet the treasury will take her additional voluntary tax payment - to help the government in its quest to put a chicken in every pot.

You mean Babs is paying only the minimum she is required for taxes, and taking 'deductions', but what about the children, the poor children?

I am shocked, shocked I tell you.

43 posted on 11/13/2002 11:16:04 AM PST by Triple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mondonico
The Democrats who stood up to the president and showed strong opposition leadership were the ones that won on Tuesday.

Name one, Babs. Name a single, solitary Democrat who ran against the president's agenda and won (and uncontested liberals like Nancy Pelosi and Jijad Jim McDermott don't count).

44 posted on 11/13/2002 11:17:03 AM PST by seamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
Do these liberal Hollywood types get some type of 'artist' tax breaks through the Dems? I find them highly hypocritical when they whine about tax breaks that go only to the rich...they are the rich.
45 posted on 11/13/2002 11:17:21 AM PST by belle99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mondonico
Blue-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-s-s-s,despai-r-r-r-rrrrr, and agone-e- on me....

Hey Babs!, you have enough grief and heartaches to make the switch to singing and writing country music-I mean the old fashion suffering kind, gal. You ever go nasal, you'll blow the rest right off the charts.

I'm not greedy, Barbs, but You should be willing to cut me in for ten percent of the profits, just for pointing you on the path to a brand new career.

Maybe for better effect you could grow a beard, like some of the other successful CW singers have these days.
46 posted on 11/13/2002 11:17:28 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mondonico

47 posted on 11/13/2002 11:17:31 AM PST by Jaxter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mondonico
You recken that when Bush wins his second term she'll pack up and leave? I mean, what's it gonna take?
48 posted on 11/13/2002 11:17:35 AM PST by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mondonico
"These judges are guaranteed to threaten ... a woman's right to choose [abortion]."

An act so vile that she dare not speak its name?

Dear Babs, your useful idiocy is appreciated by a long train of rich, white people who don't mind a little genocide.

49 posted on 11/13/2002 11:45:02 AM PST by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Caspian
So as we move forward, I, for one, will continue to urge the Democrats, even as, or especially as, the minority/opposition party, to be vocal in conveying the differences to the American public.

Based on the poorly constructed sentence above, I'd say she wrote it herself.

50 posted on 11/13/2002 11:48:39 AM PST by zingzang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mondonico
The Democratic Party was not able to articulate a clear message - was not able to convey the very real and very many differences between the two parties.

And that was the DemocRATs' problem, if they had articulated a clearer message as to what they stood for they would have lost even more badly than they did.

The Democrats who stood up to the president and showed strong opposition leadership were the ones that won on Tuesday. Hopefully, by 2004, the party - and the people - will get the message.

See Max Cleland.

51 posted on 11/13/2002 12:21:01 PM PST by Mike Darancette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson