Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LAURA INGRAHAM'S WEEKLY E-BLAST - IMMIGRATION
LauraIngraham.com ^ | Nov. 18, 2002 | Laura Ingraham

Posted on 11/19/2002 9:30:47 AM PST by madfly

E-Blast
Nov. 18, 2002

By Laura Ingraham

When most people think about the "American Dream," family, hard work, God, love of country come to mind. But if "immigrant rights" groups and their supporters in Washington have their way, the dream will also include law-breaking.

With Republicans poised to take control of both house of Congress in January, a legislative quandary awaits them -- a bill called the "Dream Act," the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act. Introduced by Utah Senator Orrin Hatch earlier this year, it would make it easier for states to offer in-state tuition rates at state colleges, and also would grant students lawful residency upon graduation from high school if they had lived in the country at least five years. (They could file for a conditional green card, and thus could legally drive and work.)

Why do conservatives like Hatch, and his House colleague Rep. Chris Cannon, support a bill that would reward illegality? Colorado's Rep. Tom Tancredo, a bulldog for enforcing our immigration laws, thinks it's a combination of politics (attracting Latino votes) and money (insuring business-owners a constant source of cheap labor). Hatch insists that the undocumented students -- by some estimates as many 600,000 in our high schools-"are assimilated into American culture…and grow up to be contributors to society."

That the majority of the illegal immigrant students want to work hard and better their lives is not in question. The problem is that for each slot an illegal immigrant takes at a state college or university, it is one less spot for American students or for immigrants who have followed immigration laws and procedures. (Illegals can also apply in the category of "international admissions.") And let's not forget, our new Homeland Security Department will have enough on its hands with 8 million illegals here, along with the 300,000 subject to deportation but on the loose.

For some outlandish reason, there is no specific federal prohibition against colleges and universities enrolling illegal immigrants. However, federal law places some restrictions on allowing such students to pay in-state tuition rates, and it prohibits them from receiving federal financial aid.

The pending Hatch-Cannon legislation will be a test for Republicans, who are ever-mindful of the growing influence Hispanics have in elections coast to coast. In the 2002 mid-term elections, many Republican candidates nationwide did better than expected among Hispanic voters. New York Governor George Pataki improved his support among Hispanic voters, chiefly due to his support for legalizing some illegals in the state. Governor Jeb Bush won a majority of the Latino vote, receiving strong support from Cuban-Americans.

Fearful of reprisals at the voting booth, the GOP has largely avoided taking on such these immigration-related issues. "When it comes to immigration, the president's approach is guided by compassion and fairness," said Sharon Castillo, an RNC spokesperson.

But isn't fairness supposed to be ensured by following the rule of law? President Bush's message on everything from fighting terror to corporate corruption is grounded in respecting the laws of the land. When people who set out to thwart our legal system are rewarded with benefits that are designated for law-abiding Americans and immigrants, why should we expect any would-be immigrants to go through the hassle of following our immigration laws?

Some states such as California, New York and Texas are already dangling carrots along the border. All passed bills allowing admission and in-state tuition for illegals. Several other states are considering similar measures.

Yet if there is a national trend toward bending the rules to allow greater access to education for illegals, Virginia's Republican Attorney General Jerry Kilgore wants no part of it. To the great consternation and outrage of groups like the Mexican American Legal Defense Fund, he recently directed his state's public colleges not to enroll illegals. And get this-he also told the institutions to report illegals they discover on campus to federal authorities. (The horror!)

Kilgore is right. Since September 11th, all universities nationwide should be doing everything they can to help the INS track foreign students, not create problems by looking the other way when illegals attempt to take advantage of benefits designated for those here lawfully. Yet our federal government is on the verge of giving state universities the green light to do just that with the so-called Dream Act. It is already a nightmare for our understaffed, under-funded Border Patrol to enforce our borders, it will only get worse with the beacon of more benefits for law-breakers.

WORD OF THE DAY

Avatar, noun. 1.The incarnation of a Hindu deity, especially Vishnu, in human or animal form. 2. An embodiment, as of a quality or concept; an archetype: the very avatar of cunning. 3. A temporary manifestation or aspect of a continuing entity. As in--

Yoga is in its present avatar, with studios popping up coast to coast.

 



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 000unknown; 300; borderpatrol; chriscannon; dreamact; foreignstudents; illegalsoncampus; immigration; ins; senatorhatch; tomtancredo; universities
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: madfly
GW Bush=One-Term President
61 posted on 11/19/2002 4:49:06 PM PST by jragan2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
Your bringing up South Africans is an interesting point.
With all of the persecution the Afrikaner-Boer farmers
are facing from the Marxist ANC with over 1,000 farmers
there murdered by unknown sources (most likely from ANC-
supporters), the United States should work to bring any
farmer from South Africa who wishes to migrate here to
help the U.S. prosper, instead of allowing diseased
illegals from South of the Border infesting our land.
62 posted on 11/19/2002 4:52:43 PM PST by jragan2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death
And I agree with much of your post!
63 posted on 11/19/2002 5:55:08 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: madfly; Mercuria
Love Laura!
64 posted on 11/19/2002 6:09:55 PM PST by HangFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BrowningBAR
"Dream Nightmare Act"

Just ran across this post...you took the words right out of my mouth!
65 posted on 11/19/2002 6:54:13 PM PST by 4America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Nothing new here folks. With the rare exceptions like Tom Tancredo, our elected officials (from both sides) are selling this country out as fast as they can. Most of the problems with illegal immigration in general - and the INS in particular - is the result of these elected officials (and their flunkies in INS management) working behind the scenes to keep the laws from being enforced effectively. That, combined with things like the Diversity Visa (Lottery), this (low)Life Act, and so many other boondoggles, has provided this country with the nightmare that the American public is only now finding out about. Combine that with situations like the Malva fiasco (definintely nothing new there) and you have a sure recipe for disaster.
66 posted on 11/19/2002 7:13:34 PM PST by greggery_peccary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill
67 posts and another FReeper says "Close the borders". While our troops risk their lives attacking Iraq Iraqi-Saudi-Taliban terrorists are rendezvousing and setting up for "Operation Border Bust". I'm not very pleased to even think it but I predict that within 24 hours of our first major assault on Iraq there will be a response within our borders. I hope I'm wrong.
67 posted on 11/19/2002 7:37:09 PM PST by TigersEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jragan2001
#62 - good point. The few thousand who seriously need to leave there can't, but as many Mexicans come across the border every day without the Bush administration lifting a finger.
68 posted on 11/19/2002 7:47:08 PM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
First of all, self-employed people are required to pay their taxes on a quarterly basis. And second, if you are significantly under-withheld, the feds can assess a penalty.

I wonder if Bush would do anything about the illegals he wants to amnesty never having paid their income taxes.

69 posted on 11/19/2002 9:43:18 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
I told her to vacation in Mexico and then cross the border as tourists.

I knew a guy from Hong Kong who overstayed a student visa and was working in the US, he would do exactly that ---only he didn't cross as a tourist. When he wanted to go home for a visit, he'd go to Mexico to fly home and back and then cross the border over the bridge because he didn't have to worry about being stopped. His English was good enough, he'd just say he was American --like so many Mexicans do and that was all.

70 posted on 11/19/2002 9:46:49 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill; TigersEye
I jumped for joy when I found this article in my inbox from Laura Ingraham. I knew that she's a freeper darling, after speaking at Friva Las Vegas and figured there wouldn't be many showing up to knock her words. I'm hoping her words have made a diference to those who continue to bash those of us who do see a threat from our unsecured borders. And I agree and am fearful that if we start bombing Iraq there will be a greater need to secure our country. I'm also worried about the safety of the brave volunteers down there.
71 posted on 11/20/2002 2:56:19 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: greggery_peccary
BTTT
72 posted on 11/20/2002 8:23:19 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Laura Ingraham is great. She really shines on TV in debate. Her grasp of facts and ability to bring them together in a cohesive and incisive comeback is dynamite. She has a way of leaving her opponent climbing out of a very deep hole of their own making.

I agree and am fearful that if we start bombing Iraq there will be a greater need to secure our country. I'm also worried about the safety of the brave volunteers down there.

Amen to that. All my thoughts and hopes for their success and well being go with them. I won't give an inch on our stand with Iraq based on the fact that we might get bitten here, but I do worry that it will happen. I fear it's a little late to tighten up security in regards to that. We're going to have to learn the hard way.

73 posted on 11/20/2002 9:40:12 AM PST by TigersEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
She is dynamite alright. I used to watch her on IMUS, then on her own hour show following IMUS. She's got a great one-two punch and a confident smile. She is tops.

Looks like she has made her point here :). Thanks Laura!
(if you're lurking)

74 posted on 11/20/2002 5:58:33 PM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
bttt
75 posted on 11/21/2002 8:14:46 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ME4W
ping
76 posted on 11/22/2002 6:01:52 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Ping thanks.
77 posted on 11/22/2002 10:36:51 PM PST by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson