Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thirty-nine years after JFK's assassination...
St Paul Pioneer (de)Press ^ | 11/21/02 | MARIANNE MEANS

Posted on 11/21/2002 7:31:34 AM PST by Valin

Thirty-nine years after JFK's assassination, the chance of another Kennedy achieving the presidency no longer seems inevitable. A promise unfulfilled

It will be 39 years on Friday since President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in a motorcade in Dallas when a rifle bullet shattered his skull. His promise was unfulfilled, his administration unfinished. The pervasive sense of sudden loss was devastating to millions. But the gauzy legend that sprang up around him after his death is now the dusty stuff of history, its magic overcome by the clarity of hindsight. The Kennedy name is now as much a curse as a blessing.

Roughly 102 million Americans alive today were not born when Kennedy moved into the White House in 1961. They know him only from the vast distance of time, his image distorted by slanderous movies, wild-eyed conspiracy theories and other mindless claptrap peddled by hucksters out to make money or earn notoriety. Many of us who actually knew him and were with him in Dallas that fateful Nov. 22 — first lady Jacqueline Kennedy, officials, staffers, Secret Service agents, reporters — are gone now too. Kennedy was 46 years old when he was shot. We who were adults in his era are all older now than he was then.

Time has taken its toll on the once-presumed inevitability of another Kennedy presidency. Sen. Robert Kennedy was assassinated in the midst of his own 1968 presidential campaign. Sen. Edward Kennedy's White House prospects died in 1969 when an aide, Mary Jo Kopechne, drowned in the car he accidentally drove off a bridge on Chappaquiddick Island, Mass. John F. Kennedy Jr., heir to the most famous political name of our era, died childless at the age of 38 in a place crash off Martha's Vineyard in July 1999. Robert Kennedy's children, who make up the bulk of the family's second generation, have not been good dynasty material. A longtime family associate says sadly, "They were so spoiled." Joe Kennedy served six undistinguished terms in Congress but dropped out of a 1997 race for governor of Massachusetts amid scandals about himself, his ex-wife and his brother, Michael. Another brother, Max, declined to run for Congress. Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, Joe's older sister, was beaten this month when she ran for governor of Maryland. Mark Shriver, the son of Eunice Kennedy Shriver, lost a Democratic primary for a Maryland congressional seat this spring.

Camelot, the mythical embodiment of Kennedy glamour, was never real. Jackie made it up. A pleasant but transitory illusion, it could not be sustained in the face of several accounts written since John Kennedy's death exposing his relentless philandering.

The recent release of detailed records showing how expertly Kennedy handled the Cuban missile crisis restored his reputation somewhat. But now comes the discovery by noted historian Robert Dallek that Kennedy suffered from undisclosed maladies that required him to constantly take a shocking array of powerful drugs.

Dallek and a physician, Dr. Jeffery A. Kelman, examined previously sealed medical records of the last eight years of Kennedy's life stored in the Kennedy Library. The pair found that Kennedy had been taking antispasmodics, antibiotics, hydrocortisone, testosterone, salt tablets, antihistamines, an antianxiety drug, antidiarrhea drugs, codeine, Demerol, methadone, Ritalin, meprobamate, librium, barbituates for sleep, thyroid hormone and injections of gamma globulin, apparently to combat infection, and procaine, to kill back pain before public events. He was a walking medicine cabinet.

Throughout his earlier career and during the White House years, Kennedy and his advisers heatedly denied that he had serious health problems. Understandably, he wished to project the illusion of youthful vigor, and he did. But it was a frightening deception. The public had a right to know of the frailties that could have interfered with his ability to function at any moment.

The last man standing in the Kennedy family saga is Ted. The senator from Massachusetts has survived more personal and professional crises than the biblical Job — sex scandals, a divorce and gross weight fluctuations. Kennedy ran for president in the 1980 Democratic primaries but could not overcome the Chappaquiddick tragedy. Furthermore, in a serious lapse of judgment, he ran against the incumbent president of his own party, Jimmy Carter.

Since then, however, Kennedy has worked hard to become a serious legislator, and with Sen. Strom Thurmond's retirement, he is now the third-longest serving senator. A recent biography by Adam Clymer concludes that his influence on the nation after more than a third of a century in the Senate is far greater than that of his brothers John and Robert, whose lives were cut short. His son Patrick, 35, is a four-term congressman from Rhode Island, doing a sound if unspectacular job and apparently content to stay where he is. For Ted Kennedy at 70, there are still things to be done. He successfully spearheaded a recent campaign to bring the 2004 Democratic National Convention to his native Boston. Ironically, the nominee crowned there just could be a Massachusetts senator. But it would be John Kerry, not another Kennedy.

Means (e-mail: means@hearstdc.com) is a Washington columnist for Hearst Newspapers. Distributed by the New York Times News Service.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: jfk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

1 posted on 11/21/2002 7:31:34 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Valin
New flash John is still a memember of the Rock Group Dead Kennedy's.
2 posted on 11/21/2002 7:34:33 AM PST by dts32041
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
the chance of another Kennedy achieving the presidency no longer seems inevitable. A promise unfulfilled

What promise? Who ordained that this family of drunks, sex addicts and miscreants should run America ad infinitum?

3 posted on 11/21/2002 7:35:46 AM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Thirty-nine years after JFK's assassination, the chance of another Kennedy achieving the presidency no longer seems inevitable remotely possible, except perhaps in delusional West Wing la-la land..
4 posted on 11/21/2002 7:36:26 AM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
Who ordained that this family of drunks, sex addicts and miscreants should run America ad infinitum?

Joe Kennedy?

5 posted on 11/21/2002 7:38:30 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
--an undistinguished Presidency, purchased with Dad's money, bouyed up by unscrupulous "journalists" and other syncophants, very likely ended by former "associates" of the same Dad due to treachery--
6 posted on 11/21/2002 7:38:35 AM PST by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Maceman
..the chance of another Kennedy achieving the presidency no longer seems inevitable remotely possible,

Agreed.

IMHO, the death of John Jr. was the ringing of the Kennedy family's political tree. It'll take a few more years while it whithers, and Ted is secure in his Senate seat forever, but they are over.
8 posted on 11/21/2002 7:47:34 AM PST by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Valin
Anyone who thinks the name "camelot" is inappropriate, hasn't read about the original.
10 posted on 11/21/2002 7:52:53 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Telling...very telling.

I was dusting my furniture on Nov 22, 1963 and just 7 days away from the birth of our second child. I was in the corner of the living room and had the TV on. Stood there lifeless hearing the word as the Breaking News appeared on our screen. Shock, sadness, anger and other emotions all rolled up into one.

The world stopped! The funeral, the family, Jackie and the children just made you cry. It was a very tragic time for our country. I saved papers and magazines and anything that had their photos or stories about the Kennedys. I loved President Kennedy, his wife and children and his whole family and to see this happen to him was unbearable.

Unfortunately over the years the shine on the Kennedys in my eyes and heart began to dim and dim and dim until there was nothing left.

Very sad when you think of the potential that was there and what good they could have done. Granted President Kennedy and Robert Kennedy had their lives shortened by fanatics who I hope are burning in hell as we speak. However, the rest of the family could have done great things for this country and stood tall doing all they could to keep that shine on the Kennedy name.

I was disappointed, sad and disgusted with the behaviors of the remaining Kennedys whose antics and arrogant mentality constantly made the headlines in the most negative ways.

They were a family that COULD have been but instead became a family that NEVER would. A sad ending brought on by them and them alone and that's the biggest tragedy of all!
11 posted on 11/21/2002 7:55:55 AM PST by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldenboy
notice all the above posters are old time Freepers

I prefer seasoned, practiced, case-hardened, steeled.
Age and deceit beat youth and skill. :-)
12 posted on 11/21/2002 8:09:32 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Valin
Thirty-nine years after JFK's assassination...

He's still dead. Amazing, I know...

14 posted on 11/21/2002 8:37:52 AM PST by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
Camelot, the mythical embodiment of Kennedy glamour, was never real. Jackie made it up.

Jackie did'nt make it up. The press did three years AFTER his death. The only democrat to admit this is Chris Matthews. And I just love how this dupe quotes Adam Clymer and his book on Kennedy, where Clymer excused Ted's manslaughter/wrongful death of Mary Jo Kopechne because he ended up working for leftist causes.

Make sure y'all write this forlorn author and tell her not to worry and that a new "American Royalty" has arrived - the Bush Dynasty. I'm sure she's love it...

15 posted on 11/21/2002 8:46:56 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Valin
-I'll always give him respect for this:


"This nation needs a tax cut now that will benefit every family and every business. A tax cut means higher family incomes. More after-tax money means more buying power. And this means more production and the jobs our nation needs. We are talking about a tax cut that will help create jobs and income for everyone. I strongly urge you to support this bill for you family’s sake and your country’s sake."

– John F. Kennedy
Sept. 18, 1963

Tax cut passed posthumously in 1964



"It should be noted that many of Kennedy's more liberal economic advisors opposed the tax cut, most notably John Kenneth Galbraith. So did some Republicans who were fixated on green-eyeshade budgeting, such as a congressman from Kansas by the name of Robert Dole."
http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0301jfk.htm



16 posted on 11/21/2002 8:48:52 AM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Who ordained that this family of drunks, sex addicts and miscreants should run America ad infinitum?

Meyer Lansky, Bugsy Seigel, Lucky Lucciano, et al?

17 posted on 11/21/2002 8:57:01 AM PST by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Valin
An interesting question, for anyone who wants to discuss this article rather than just heap invective on JFK's progenitors and living relatives:

Why can't the liberals just move on?

The guy's been dead for half a lifetime, for heaven's sake.

Why do they keep recycling this weepy "promise unfulfilled" garbage?

Psychology of the left ping, please.

18 posted on 11/21/2002 9:01:56 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldenboy
Your linked article makes a very good point, which I have comented on repeatedly.

Assassination researchers are almost all from the "JFK was killed because he was good" school. Now, they all have different goodnesses in mind (Vietnam, Federal Reserve, civil rights, anti-mafia, etc, etc, etc).

In real homicides, the victim is often killed not because they are good, but because they are mixed up in something bad.

Of this, there is abundant evidence in the life of JFK.

I am fascinated by the case, and I think motive is the key to the solution.

19 posted on 11/21/2002 9:07:58 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Why can't the liberals just move on?

The last democrat president they can at least pretend was a success.
LBJ, Viet Nam
Jimmy Carter, Gas Lines, double digit inflation, Iran...
Willard, I don't have enough time to even start a list.
20 posted on 11/21/2002 9:10:03 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson