Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nov3
but instead they said it was a cure all and hid the damage. I hope they reap what they sow.

I don't recall the early marketing approaches they took. I never was given information from my doctor that this would be a good pill to take than for anything other then depression. I don't deny that didn't market it as such, but just really don't know whether they did.

As far as reaping what they sow, I can understand to an extent, but so many people have been heped by this drug, and some that I know personally. Don't forget that what you advocate will impact them as well!

21 posted on 12/02/2002 1:30:29 PM PST by technochick99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: technochick99
Don't forget that what you advocate will impact them as well!

I don't advocate taking this drug off of the market. It will probably be sued off the market now because of the way they handled it.

They should have been honest about the side effects and given better prescribing info. Also every doctor in the universe shouldn't be prescribing it. They simply are not qualified to diagnose all the side effects and closely follow up the patients on this drug. A GP should not be prescribing this drug and saying I will see you in 2 months. A lot can happen in two months.

27 posted on 12/02/2002 1:37:07 PM PST by Nov3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson