Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: technochick99
Don't forget that what you advocate will impact them as well!

I don't advocate taking this drug off of the market. It will probably be sued off the market now because of the way they handled it.

They should have been honest about the side effects and given better prescribing info. Also every doctor in the universe shouldn't be prescribing it. They simply are not qualified to diagnose all the side effects and closely follow up the patients on this drug. A GP should not be prescribing this drug and saying I will see you in 2 months. A lot can happen in two months.

27 posted on 12/02/2002 1:37:07 PM PST by Nov3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Nov3
A GP should not be prescribing this drug and saying I will see you in 2 months. A lot can happen in two months.

I agree somewhat. My GP did the initial prescribing. However, I was in her office almost weekly for awhile. And unlike some other patients, I read all small print included in the packaging.

Many drugs are used for things not originally intended by the FDA's approval process. Some are successful, others not. Did Lilly really market this for things such as weight loss?

30 posted on 12/02/2002 1:43:02 PM PST by technochick99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Nov3
I don't advocate taking this drug off of the market. It will probably be sued off the market now because of the way they handled it.

It just went off patent so it will stay on the market. The trial lawyers, on the other hand, won't fail to get their cut. Are they suing any patients who failed to inform themselves sufficiently to make better decisions?

39 posted on 12/02/2002 2:03:00 PM PST by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson