Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans Outflanked Themselves in Louisiana
CapitolHillBlue.com ^ | 12/9/02 | LEE HOCKSTADER & ADAM NOSSITER

Posted on 12/09/2002 1:29:20 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!

NEW ORLEANS -- The Republican playbook for deposing Sen. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana was fine-tuned in Washington and battle-tested with glorious results elsewhere in the South: Recruit a plausible challenger. Unleash attack ads skewering the Democrat on taxes and abortion. And for the grand finale, bring in President Bush to campaign at the Republican candidate's side.

But something went wrong in the Bayou State. Landrieu, who just a week ago seemed to fit the GOP blueprint's definition of a vulnerable incumbent, held off the challenge and won a convincing victory in a runoff election Saturday. She beat the Republican, elections commissioner Suzanne Haik Terrell, 52 percent to 48 percent.

Today, as Republicans licked their wounds, Democrats crowed at what amounted to one of their few bright spots in an otherwise disastrous political year. Some dubbed the winner -- whose triumph Saturday dwarfed her 5,788-vote margin of victory in 1996 -- "Landslide Landrieu."

Democratic operatives and political analysts said the Republicans were guilty of political hubris, believing in their own invincibility and therefore overplaying their hand by relying too heavily on negative advertising, and counting too much on Bush's electoral magic.

Bush's eleventh-hour visit, and the relentless barrage of advertising attacks on Landrieu, may even have backfired, analysts said, and were probably factors in generating a higher turnout in the core Democratic base of African Americans.

"The president's visit energized the conservative base, but it also energized the Democratic base," said Marc Morial, the Democratic former mayor of New Orleans.

At a morning news conference today in downtown New Orleans, Landrieu stressed the role of blacks in her victory. Standing beside U.S. Rep. William J. Jefferson, a New Orleans Democrat who is perhaps Louisiana's most influential black politician, Landrieu declared, "The soul of our party is the African American community, and they stood up.''

Analysts also credited Landrieu with running a more nimble campaign, one that took advantage of Louisiana's demographic and political peculiarities -- it is poorer, more progressive, more Catholic and more African American than some other Southern states. She benefited enormously by her close alliance with Sen. John Breaux, the state's hugely popular senior Democratic senator, who accompanied her in many campaign appearances throughout the month-long runoff. The Democrats' "Breaux factor" may partly have offset the Republicans' "Bush factor," some analysts said.

But Landrieu also took other lessons from the Republican victories on Nov. 5. Chief among them was the importance of devising some message, strategy or issue that would offset the president's formidable personal popularity with a local issue that played to the Democrats' advantage. In Landrieu's case, the issue was sugar.

The day after Bush's campaign visit to the state last Tuesday, Landrieu's campaign began airing an ad charging that the White House had struck a "secret deal" to double Mexican sugar imports to the United States. The imports would hurt Louisiana's 27,000 sugar farmers and the state's $1.7 billion sugar industry.

The ad hung on a slender thread of evidence: a single, unsourced article in the Mexican newspaper Reforma. The White House denied the existence of any such "deal" to flood the United States with cheap Mexican sugar. Nonetheless, the point seemed to hit home, dovetailing with Landrieu's message that she would put "Louisiana first" while Terrell -- by now appearing in television ads side by side with the president -- would be a rubber stamp for the administration who would disregard the state's interests.

"The momentum definitely shifted when we came out with the sugar issue," said Mitch Landrieu, a Democratic member of the state's House of Representatives who served as a key unofficial campaign operative for his older sister Mary. "It played directly into our theme and proved our point that a senator's supposed to be for Louisiana first and Suzie [Terrell] and George Bush are linked at the hip."

The sugar ad was critical in reassembling the Democratic coalition in Louisiana of working-class whites, especially farmers, and urban blacks, about 90 percent of whom are believed to support Landrieu. And it played on the populist traditions of a poor, small state whose more indigent residents have traditionally seen Washington and big business as hostile forces.

"It reinforced a suspicion in Louisiana that we're going to get it in the neck," said John Maginnis, a political analyst in Baton Rouge, La., and the publisher of a political newsletter. "It used an economic issue to reconnect rural whites and blacks."

Meanwhile, the Landrieu campaign's all-out push to maximize black turnout got an unexpected -- and unintended -- assist from the Republicans. The more the Republicans flooded the airwaves with ads attacking Landrieu as a liberal, the more it galvanized black support for her, and reinforced their resolve to vote, analysts said.

"It just got out of control," said Silas Lee, a sociologist at Xavier University in New Orleans. "African American voters wanted a more positive message."

In addition, workers in the Landrieu campaign cited what appeared to be unusually aggressive Republican efforts to dampen black turnout. They produced a flyer they said had been distributed in black public housing complexes in New Orleans, apparently designed to mislead black voters.

The flyer reads, in part: "Vote!!! Bad Weather? No problem!!! If the weather is uncomfortable on election day (Saturday December 7th) Remember you can wait and cast your ballot on Tuesday December 10th."

With two Democratic U.S. senators, both of them Catholics, the state remains what it has always been: a Deep South anomaly. The ethnic and religious mix is different here. And as Louisiana slips in national economic indicators, its poverty may be influencing voting behavior.

During the campaign, Landrieu shied away from direct attacks on the Bush administration, fearing the personal popularity of a president whose approval rating in Louisiana stands above 70 percent. At one point, she even touted her record of having voted with the White House three-quarters of the time.

But today, emboldened by victory, she dropped her reticence. "People in Louisiana have maybe had it harder than most. They can recognize injustice," she said. "Because we are a poor state, people really do depend on the government. They are very disappointed at what they are seeing coming out of the White House, and they just expressed that anger."

© Copyright 2002 Capitol Hill Blue


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: inlouisiana; marylandrieu; outflanked; republicans; themselves
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

1 posted on 12/09/2002 1:29:21 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Am I missing the part of this article that says that W J Clinton did not show up in Leeezyanna so this HELPED the democrats!
2 posted on 12/09/2002 1:31:47 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Anyone have any info on that flyer? That seems a bit low even for a close campaign.
3 posted on 12/09/2002 1:35:55 PM PST by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Read this.
4 posted on 12/09/2002 1:36:45 PM PST by geaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
"It just got out of control," said Silas Lee, a sociologist at Xavier University in New Orleans. "African American voters wanted a more positive message."

You mean like the NAACP sponsored ad depicting Dubya dragging a black man to his death behind a pick-up truck?

5 posted on 12/09/2002 1:38:14 PM PST by What Is Ain't
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
ping
6 posted on 12/09/2002 1:38:22 PM PST by Fish out of Water
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Go ahead, keep worrying about a guy who's been out of office for two years. That lack of focus on the present will only help Democrats.
7 posted on 12/09/2002 1:38:34 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: geaux
Yes, a very impressive victory for an incumbent in a state that has a 3-1 dimocrat registration edge, and has not elected a republican senator in over 100 years. Impressive indeed.
8 posted on 12/09/2002 1:41:04 PM PST by joltinjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Landrieu, who just a week ago seemed to fit the GOP blueprint's definition of a vulnerable incumbent, held off the challenge and won a convincing victory,...

Yeah, 51.5% to 48.5% is real convincing. BFD. Little Tommy Dasshole is still going to be the Minority Leader.

9 posted on 12/09/2002 1:41:35 PM PST by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
They also conveniently failed to mention that Landrieu pledged to oppose taxpayer funded abortions, and to support legislation to protect human life starting at conception, on a Catholic Church questionnaire. Now that she's safely re-elected, we're supposed to forget that so she can vote pro-abortion.

Of course, she was lying in her claims of a secret sugar deal. If that's what turned the election around, then it shows how sleazy Demo-rat campaigns really are.
10 posted on 12/09/2002 1:42:31 PM PST by puroresu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
We didn't outflank ourselves. The RATS brought in Donna Brazile, (who had the added benefit of being from Louisiana) and she performed a picture-perfect knock-and-drag on election day. It even included direct over-the-phone threats from Bill Clinton to hesitant black "leaders" a couple of days beforehand to "get out the vote or else. The GOP, on the other hand, completely disbanded their brilliant GOTV campaign after November 5th and just threw money at Terrell.
11 posted on 12/09/2002 1:43:50 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber
Anyone have any info on that flyer? That seems a bit low even for a close campaign.

It's the first I've heard of it, and IMO it's much more likely to have been created by Democrats than Republicans.

12 posted on 12/09/2002 1:47:11 PM PST by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RonF
It is not I that worries about Clinton it should be the demokrats. Any lack of focus statement on the 'present' time is riduculous as it is still the Clinton's ( Senator Clinton) through McCauliffe that are still in the present and running the show. So I will point out; that is why they lost the majority. Their La. win means nothing but they corrupted and cheated. They are and were desparate.
13 posted on 12/09/2002 1:47:47 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
I thought it was a pretty good thing: The country is about evenly divided ( Pro/Anti Bush ), and the balance in the Senate reflects the national mood more accurately than a "flash-in-the-pan" Republican landslide would have done.

The Administration, instead of having a free pass , now has its work cut out for it - and that benefits the people as a whole.

14 posted on 12/09/2002 1:47:58 PM PST by genefromjersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonF
The thing is, he did get the black vote out - and if the Dems figure out a way for Clinton to get out the black vote in a low-key fashion, we're going to have serious trouble in elections, particularly in places where we should win.

We don't have much margin for error here, and Lott made a BIG mistake which WILL show up in 2004 election ads. Count on it.
15 posted on 12/09/2002 1:48:23 PM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
We could avoid all this hair pulling, all these deep, deep analyses by digging out the one number between 1 and 100m that for some reason no one seems to want to see: the percentage of elections in US (or US Congress elections, if you want to narrow it down,) where challengers beat the incumbents. What is it? 10%, 23%? The Incumbent Party won, just as it had won a month ago, just like ti wins in most every dog catcher race! Fool me once, etc...

The otherwise statistics happy media somehow don't show us these numbers so as not to foster cynicism in the world's greatest political system, is my take on this...

16 posted on 12/09/2002 1:49:02 PM PST by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Will Landrieu help La. sugar farmers in any way?
17 posted on 12/09/2002 1:50:08 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
I heard some posts here critical of having ole Maxine Waters while the other side had Bush. Now today RUSHBO is spinning the likes like nobody can. Having Landrieu win was apparantly insignificant with him. Not only is the gov a joke the people talking it are as bad.
18 posted on 12/09/2002 1:50:32 PM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
""It just got out of control," said Silas Lee, a sociologist at Xavier University in New Orleans. "African American voters wanted a more positive message."

Really ? I wonder how he'd explain the signs in some predominately black, New Orleans neighborhoods that read: Mary, if you don't respect us, don't expect us.

19 posted on 12/09/2002 1:50:51 PM PST by Darlin'
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Yes, Lott's comments will be used to galvanize black voters in 2004. They stayed home in November in states like Missouri and Georgia and the Republicans won squeakers. The black vote turned out in Lousisiana and the Dems won.

This could be a pre-cursor of 2004. Its why Lott needs to step down. This is just his latest blunder. He should have stepped down before this.

If Lott remains as speaker I see it hurting the conservative cause and the Republicans chances in 2004.
20 posted on 12/09/2002 1:52:34 PM PST by Douglas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson