[Zeroisanumber]

If you were running a business and you had an important deal that you had to secure, would you hire someone if everything they touched turned into something that resulted in the opposite of what was intended? Would you deliberately hirely the most incompetent person to speak on your behalf?

You want to load that question anymore?

I would hire the man in the best position to do the job. Past record nonwithstanding, I'd hire a dirty hippie off the street to do the job if I thought that he had the best chance of affecting the situation positively.

[anobjectivist]

Judging Jimmy Carter for who he is, how is he is in the best position to do the job.

All of his "feel good" politicing did nothing but delay problems until they stewed into something much greater than before. Cases in point: Iran, North Korea