Ignoring the rank and file The Democrats don't deserve to win in 2004

Chicago Tribune ^ | 12/17/2002 | Linda R. Monk

[TheRightGuy]

Our country is at war, a time that demands our best and most experienced leaders. But instead of uniting behind its most qualified presidential candidate, the leaders of the Democratic Party have essentially put a knife in Al Gore's back.

[... snip...]

The Republicans won the last presidential election because they were ruthless about using any means necessary to deny Americans the right to vote. I'm from Mississippi, so I know how precious that right is.

[...snip...]

John Edwards is a ventriloquist's dummy for Bill Clinton; John Kerry is a Ken-doll with no experience outside the Senate; Dick Gephardt couldn't win a Democratic majority in the House; Howard Dean of Vermont is a blip on the radar screen; and Joe Lieberman has been a pro-Israeli hardliner for so long that he will bring zero credibility to the most pressing national security issue facing this nation, peace in the Middle East.

[...snip...]

[TheRightGuy]

See source link for complete article.

I just love it when the RATS eat their own.

[samtheman]

Obviously written by a Gore Groupy.

[TheRightGuy]

Obviously written by a Gore Groupy.

Perhaps Tipper under a pen name.

[TheRightGuy]

Ping!

[widowithfoursons]

Yep. No voter fraud going on in MISSISSIPPI.

[Reo]

Another lib getting snippy.

[dinasour]

The Republicans won the last presidential election because they were ruthless about using any means necessary to deny Americans the right to vote.

Especially dead people. The 'Rats core constituency.

[TheRightGuy]

No voter fraud going on in MISSISSIPPI

'cept, perhaps, when they voted for Strom in '48.

< /sarcasm>

[TheRightGuy]

Especially dead people. The 'Rats core constituency.

Ah! So that's how the 2000 vote got to be dead even.

[TheRightGuy]

Gee whiz, Scott. Tell me what you really think!

[tm61]

"ruthless about using any means necessary to deny Americans the right to vote"
I love it when dims whine about "count all the votes". they shut up real quick when their attempt to block military ballots is brought up.

[johnny7]

Poopy pants?

Them's fightin' words out in San Fransissy. HA!

Kerry had plenty of money before he married the whack-job. He's a Boston blueblood.

Now Hillary Rodham Clinton is the one to watch. A true “mudder”.

She(?) can sling it better than Kerry or Edwards.

[afuturegovernor]

Mississippi has a lot cleaner election than Illinois, Louisiana, South Dakota, or New Jersey.

[codercpc]

John Kerry is a Ken-doll

I am very much against the current practice of voting on looks, I was an early Steve Forbes backer, but give me a break-John Kerry is a Ken-doll? He has got to be one of the ugliest men to run for President in recent memory.

Find me a pair of those glasses this writer is wearing!

[hosepipe]

author: Linda R. Monk....... fooled us by shortening her last name..
Very Interesting.......................

[RedWing9]

She should quit her job and go on a comedy tour...

[wai-ming]

John Edwards is a ventriloquist's dummy for Bill Clinton; John Kerry is a Ken-doll with no experience outside the Senate; Dick Gephardt couldn't win a Democratic majority in the House; Howard Dean of Vermont is a blip on the radar screen; and Joe Lieberman has been a pro-Israeli hardliner for so long that he will bring zero credibility to the most pressing national security issue facing this nation, peace in the Middle East.

What about Hillary? She should be included on any list of potential Dem nominees. She's their stealth candidate. We must be vigilant.

[TheRightGuy]

She's their stealth candidate

Not 'til '08 IMHO.