| a baby girl genetically identical to her 30-year-old mother
|
Posted on 12/26/2002 6:02:33 PM PST by HAL9000
My question was, why do you want to know these things? Will you be dissappointed if the very first implantation was successful and there were no "horrors?"
Hank
| a baby girl genetically identical to her 30-year-old mother
|
If true, then I suspect they simply are working a milestone towards that same agenda. At least the reports from the lunatic fringe are consistent.......consistently lunatic.
I am not opposed to cloning, per se... just as I am not opposed to in vitro. The state of the technology as I know it though, concerns me about what is being done here however. If the health of Dolly, and the failed attempts to create Dolly are an example, this IMHO is highly unethical.
If they have cloned on one try, I am not going to automatically oppose it. A woman needing a transplant of some sort, could be gifted with life, as well as giving life to another.
Ditto? Ibid? Echo? Mimi C.?
Clone baby birth claim
December 27, 2002
A BABY has been born through cloning, French scientist and member of the Raelian sect Brigitte Boisselier have claimed. The baby, a girl, was born on Thursday by caesarean section. The birth "went very well," said Boisselier, president of the human cloning society Clonaid, on the telephone.
As the effort by the Raelians to achieve the first human birth by cloning was carried out in the utmost secrecy, it was not immediately possible to obtain any independent scientific confirmation that the baby was in fact a clone.
Agence France-Presse
Isogyneia
I can't decide whether to give you an award or keelhaul you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
Why would anyone do this to their own child? Do they not understand the implications of a child having the exact same immune system as its parent? The whole purpose of sexual reproduction is precisely to scramble the genes from one generation to the next, so that disease organisms that evolve to be successful in the parent do not also kill the offspring. This woman has just given her many disease organisms (we all have millions of them inside us) a thirty-year head start on adapting to her kid's immune system. Whatever ultimately kills her will find no resistance in her child. That's just dumb.