You dumb tobacco adicts simply don't understand how offensive your addiction is. If a public business is there for me to be a customer, just because I go in doesn't mean I have to be subjected to any bahavior that some idiot and the owner think is OK. Make it a private club (like drinking places in dry areas), but if it is public, then comply with the standards for the conduct of public business.
I know you pathetic smokers are being shamed and taxed to your limits because of your terrible addiction. It is so sad. And, we are going to miss your taxes and having one group of people in this country that we can make fun of when tobacco is declared a prohibited product. But, 'til then, if I want to eat there and it's public, you can't smoke there.
How old are you? You can't even spell.
I know you pathetic smokers are being shamed and taxed to your limits because of your terrible addiction. It is so sad. And, we are going to miss your taxes and having one group of people in this country that we can make fun of when tobacco is declared a prohibited product. But, 'til then, if I want to eat there and it's public, you can't smoke there.
If they ban tobacco, then you will have to pick up the tab, my friend. They will come after you and "your little addictions." Don't think they will? Your in for a treat. The world does not rotate on your arse. And tobacco has been around hundreds of years before you were even born.
I resent your put-downs of me and my fellow Conservatives on this thread because we are adults and choose to smoke a legal product. Better hide your dirt bike! The government is going to ban them, so word has it. heh!
Still mistaking smoker threads for a cyber therapy session, lashing out at your betters and trying to make people believe that you're capable of enjoying anything.
Such a bitter person, too little to be considered a tragic figure. Just sort of a Tasmanian Devil cartoonish thing, incapable of even being interesting.
So what if the government went the other way and demanded that everyone smoke in public and smoke in private establishments? You do realize this is the same thing? As long as you reverse the "junk science" you can reverse the decision, once again without noting our Constitutional Rights.
1. I do not smoke.
2. I do not enjoy second-hand smoke.
3. I have made the DECISION not to smoke.
4. I like the fact that I can change my mind if I see fit.
5. I have the right to "reject" an establishment if the smoke bothers me. '
This is about RIGHTS, and you don't understand that you are clearly the "dumb" citizen. I want the option to smoke. I want the option to drive an SUV. I want the option to not wear my seatbelt. I want the option to ride a motorcycle without a helmet.
Now, I will argue that tax payers should "not" be responsible for any ailments a smoker suffers that is correlated with their habits. It's just as absurd as paying for "gender" modifications in California.
Bow down to socialism and you'll find yourself in a tyranny. You better stand up for your RIGHT regardless of whether you like smoke.