Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seat Belt Laws Save Lives, Kill Liberties
boblonsberry.com ^ | 1/27/03 | Bob Lonsberry

Posted on 01/27/2003 12:21:52 PM PST by shortstop

What do you think of seatbelt laws?

Are they a good idea, or a bad idea?

You know the ones I mean. They vary from state to state, but they’re basically alike. If you’re driving a car, and you don’t have a seat belt on, you can get a ticket.

Sometimes it’s just the driver, sometimes it’s everyone in the car.

You’ve heard the sob stories. They roll out some state trooper, or a paramedic, and have him tell you a heartbreaking story about how many accident scenes he’s been to, and how it breaks his heart to see the carnage, and how seatbelts are the only hope we have.

And we see how much the state loves us, passing laws to protect us, shielding us from our own stupidity.

And we’re grateful.

We see seatbelt laws as a sign of social progress, as proof we’re an enlightened society.

But are we right?

Are seatbelt laws a good idea?

The answer to that, surprisingly, has nothing to do with seatbelts.

Because there’s no question about that. If you don’t use a seatbelt, you are an idiot. The benefit and protection that come from seatbelts cannot be denied.

Buckle your seatbelt. Don’t start the car until you have, and until everyone else has as well.

But that’s not the point.

Seatbelt laws aren’t about seatbelts, they are about freedom. And the role of government.

The question isn’t, “Should you wear a seatbelt?” It is, “Can government force you to wear a seatbelt?’

And, in spite of what the state legislatures have done, the answer to the second question, in America, is clear. The answer is, “No.”

We are a free people. Our government, as envisioned in our founding documents, is small and weak. It is not meant to make every decision or to legislate in every area. It is not meant to run our lives.

And yet we have come to let it.

Piece by piece, inch by inch, American freedom has dwindled and dwindled.

We are the victims of tyranny in the name of compassion.

Slavery in the guise of protection.

Each benefit of government has come at the cost of a corresponding liberty.

We are safer, but we are less free.

And we have been robbed.

Because freedom is better than safety. Liberty more important than life, and self-reliance of greater worth than governmental paternalism.

We are a nation built on the belief that all power resides with the people. Government can only exercise the power it has been granted by the people. In America, the power of government was meant to be severely limited. In America, the government is to be the servant, not the master. In America, people are believed to be the best off when they are the most free, when they run their own lives and make their own decisions.

But our government treats us like children. It takes our liberty from us with hardly a second thought. It expands its power over us without restraint. It mandates by force of law in matters that are and should be entirely personal and private.

Like seatbelts.

Sure, the government says it is acting for our best good.

But, shouldn’t we decide as free individuals what is in our best good?

Doesn’t government’s desire to protect us from harm unavoidably separate us from God-given liberty?

Of course it does.

And yet we have taken it like sheep.

We have thanked and re-elected those legislators who have orchestrated our bondage. We have cooperated with the squandering of our national birthright. What others fought and died for, we have flushed down the toilet. Because we haven’t been smart enough to remember what this country is all about.

Freedom.

And every policy or decision of the government must pass a simple test: Does it diminish our individual liberty?

If it does, it must not be allowed. If it does, it is inherently unconstitutional. If it does, it is dangerously and unacceptably un-American.

We must be able to distinguish between what counts and what does not. We must not be confused by irrelevance. Like those sob stories the cops and insurance people tell about seatbelts.

They are beside the point.

Seatbelt laws aren’t about seatbelts.

They are about law, and the proper role of law.

And whether or not you wear a seatbelt is your business. It is not the government’s business. You are free to be stupid, and the government has no right to outlaw stupidity.

Seatbelt laws are velvet chains. We’re told they are for our own good, but they are nothing more than government oppression. They are Big Brother pretending to be our mommy.

And one more example of how we have come to accept what earlier generations of Americans would have fought to the death to resist.

   


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: aaaaaairball; aaaaairball; aaaairball; aaairball; copernicus5; lonsberry; seatbeltlaws; snnnnnnore; zzzzzzzzz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-154 next last

1 posted on 01/27/2003 12:21:52 PM PST by shortstop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shortstop
Why the heck didn't I need a dang bicycle helmet when I was a kid, yet my parents never got accused of child neglect for not making me wear them?? The amount of laws is ridiculous. It's all about the government taking away our parental rights and stepping in to parent our children for us
2 posted on 01/27/2003 12:25:17 PM PST by BSunday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
I don't want to pay cash (taking care of the family, paying for medical care and extensive physical therapy, etc.) for someone else's stupidity in not wearing a seatbelt - and

because you want to drive on the highway the community has funded, you have to play by the community rules.

Build a private road and drive like a jackass all you want.
3 posted on 01/27/2003 12:27:39 PM PST by Notwithstanding (America: Home of Abortion on Demand - 42,000,000 Slaughtered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
Stupid law. It's just another way for the police to "introduce" themselves to you...oh, and generate some revenue at the same time. Of course, wearing one will increase your chances of survival, but so will keeping your shoe laces tied while walking down the stairs. Do we NEED a law for that, too?
4 posted on 01/27/2003 12:28:55 PM PST by Puppage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
WONDEFUL post! *PING!*
5 posted on 01/27/2003 12:29:16 PM PST by Marie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
It's the American Way.
6 posted on 01/27/2003 12:30:47 PM PST by Wolfie (Mind your own business? Heck, Americans wouldn't dream of it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
I have a home in the Dominican Republic and they just recently instituted seat belt laws for drivers. They're not heavily enforced as they don't have the personnel. They also outlawed drivers using cell phones. The irony is, you can drink and drive. As long as I have my seat belt on and am not talking on the phone, I can chug away and the cop on the corner won't even bat an eye.
7 posted on 01/27/2003 12:31:37 PM PST by NYDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
In your world, we would need to have higher insurance rates for people who like the freedom of not wearing a seatbelt and who thus have bigger payouts when an accident does occur.
The rest of us should not have to pay for your freedom to live dangerously .
8 posted on 01/27/2003 12:33:08 PM PST by Notwithstanding (America: Home of Abortion on Demand - 42,000,000 Slaughtered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
Driving a car is a privilege afforded you by the state, not a God-given right. If it was we'd have every mentally ill moron tailgating us at 80mph. (Hey wait, we have that now!)

But the point is they can require you to wear a seat belt if in our representational form of government our elected officials have passed a law so stating. Geesh! Libertarians get so bent-out-of-shape over such silly laws. Just buckle up and try to have a nice day.

9 posted on 01/27/2003 12:36:36 PM PST by Doc Savage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
If you don't wear one you're a damn fool. Nevertheless, in a free country one has the right to be a damn fool. It should not be the governments business.
10 posted on 01/27/2003 12:37:05 PM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
Gray Davis' Caliban will soon pass one!
11 posted on 01/27/2003 12:38:09 PM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
The real problem is that we haven't allowed insurance companies to discriminate in their pricing. In a just society, if you want to drive without seatbelts, bareback in a bath-house, or go bungee jumping, you can PAY for the risk that the activity will result in injury. As it is, the State forces the insurers not to discriminate so all those people pay the same medical insurance rates. We have thus politically removed one of insurance's primary roles in a free market: motivating the adoption of low risk behavior while fairly allocating capital to deal with a problem should high risk behavior lead to mishap.

When we socialize medicine so that the taxpayer picks up the tab if the insurer won't pay, the public has a claim on regulating risky behavior. We have thus ceded the freedom to do as we please becuause it is no longer possible to account for risk.

12 posted on 01/27/2003 12:38:20 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Because there are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
Laws that outlaw stupidity hurt us all. Not wearing seatbelts in cars, or riding any two wheeled vehicle w/o a helmit is stupid. The government has no business legislating common sense.
13 posted on 01/27/2003 12:38:57 PM PST by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
The problem you have is with the socialist health care and welfare programs; not the seatbelt law. If someone wants to endanger their own lives, it is none of your business. By using these arguments, you open the door for the government to control all aspects of our lives in the name of "our own good". If a person is not free to make dumb decisions, they are not free. In Tennessee, they have started a program called "Click It or Ticket", it may be national, I'm not sure. I am also not sure if they are referring to our seat belts or our heels.
14 posted on 01/27/2003 12:39:09 PM PST by tnlibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I don't want to pay cash (taking care of the family, paying for medical care and extensive physical therapy, etc.) for someone else's stupidity in not wearing a seatbelt

That problem is entirely due to socialistic health care, and has nothing to do with seatbelt use.

And yet, you defend the seatbelt law while not attacking the underlying socialism that causes costs to be shifted to you.

Curious, and telling.

We all know that with freedom comes responsiblility. The idea behind socialism is that once you are not responsible for your own actions, others are. And those others are going to take your freedom in exchange.

And you bought their scam, hook like and sinker.

15 posted on 01/27/2003 12:39:19 PM PST by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I'm sorry, you seem to have gotten lost.
16 posted on 01/27/2003 12:39:50 PM PST by The FRugitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
Because freedom is better than safety. Liberty more important than life, and self-reliance of greater worth than governmental paternalism.

Amen.

17 posted on 01/27/2003 12:40:52 PM PST by AUgrad (Warrrrrrrrrrrrrrr EAGLE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
I never figured out why in FL you can ride a motorcycle and NOT wear a helmet, but you have to wear a seat belt in the car or you get a ticket. HUH?
18 posted on 01/27/2003 12:42:36 PM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
...community has funded, you have to play by the community rules....

Interesting choice of words. Ever notice how the word "community" forms the core of the word "communism?"

Be your own wet nurse if you like; I think I'll pass. Realize at the same time your loss of freedom allows your benevolent auto insurance company to beat the odds (debateably) and still charge confiscatory rates.

19 posted on 01/27/2003 12:43:03 PM PST by Agamemnon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
And, in spite of what the state legislatures have done, the answer to the second question, in America, is clear. The answer is, “No.”

Really? Unless we're discussing one's very own private road, then the State may and must set limits and conditions upon the use of roads.

I-can-do-whatever-I-want-to-Neener-Neener Bump!

20 posted on 01/27/2003 12:43:06 PM PST by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson