The Drug War Refugees

Los Angeles Times ^ | February 2, 2003 | Eric Bailey

[Protagoras]

You made post #57 to me. Extreme short term memory loss?

#57 was a question posed in response to one of your posts. You came to this thread before 57 and before I posted to you. But nice try at evasion.

So the question remains. But the reason I never asked you if you are part of the email alert group is because there is no expectation of truthfulness.

I'll ask anyway so at least the others in your group will know if you don't answer truthfully.

Have you ever notified anyone else about threads in any other way than publicly pinging them? Or ever received such a communication?

[Roscoe]

You mean the "secret" To: field in post #4.

Dope and rationality don't go together, dope and paranoia do.

[Protagoras]

So now we have two who refuse to deny.

The truth is there for everyone to see. So much for paranoia.

And why do you keep referring to dope in your posts to me? Are you trying to say something? If so, stop dancing and start talking.

In the meantime, you have admitted that you have participated in an email notification group, sending or receiving, or both.

[Protagoras]

Have you ever notified anyone else about threads in any other way than publicly pinging them? Or ever received such a communication?

That is the question you refuse to answer.

[Poohbah]

A new law requiring people to carry id? Your papers please.

Hardly new. It used to be known as "vagrancy" until a liberal pothead judge started extolling the virtues of people walking around at 1:00 AM in the morning.

[Roscoe]

So now we have two who refuse to deny.

Ping the moderators. No, wait, they're part of the "secret" conspiracy, aren't they?

[Roscoe]

Vagrancy? Next thing you know you'll be telling me that the Founding Fathers had laws against prostitution and public drunkenness!

[Poohbah]

Uh...they did, didn't they?

[Roscoe]

Yeah, well, er...

STATIST!!!!

[Protagoras]

If it's not a secret, why won't you admit it?

[Protagoras]

So there is a law requiring id to be carried?

[Poohbah]

There used to be, until a pot-smoking judge saw a penumbra of an emanation from the 14th Amendment and declared ALL vagrancy laws unconstitutional.

[Protagoras]

So when the court makes a decision you don't like he is pot smoker? And he can do that all by himself? So all of them are pot smokers? LOL

[Protagoras]

Ever smoke pot or use any illegal substance?

[Poohbah]

So when the court makes a decision you don't like he is pot smoker? And he can do that all by himself?

The circuit refused to hear en banc, and the Supremes upheld it.

And this judge, IIRC, really WAS a pot-smoker, he got caught a few times.

As for not liking the decision...I would not hastily throw out 200+ years of common law on a whim, like this guy did.

[Poohbah]

Ever smoke pot or use any illegal substance?

No, I never have.

[Protagoras]

and the Supremes upheld it.

You said it.

[Protagoras]

Where did you go Mr. Paranoia? You accuse me of that, but you don't deny. Then you say it's not secret, but you refuse to divulge. You slink away like the other in the cabal.

LOL, pathetic.