Skip to comments.
Pro-war camp can't make the case that an attack is in nationa interest
The Orange County Register ^
| Feb. 2, 2003
| Ted Galen Carpenter
Posted on 02/04/2003 4:41:12 PM PST by Barandth
Edited on 04/14/2004 10:05:49 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-145 next last
To: Barandth
Because war is the continuation of politics by other means.
Because the UN must act or disband.
Because war is an idea proven by time, and that time has come.
Because the superbowl is over and there is nothing on the box.
21
posted on
02/04/2003 5:06:23 PM PST
by
tet68
To: Barandth
22
posted on
02/04/2003 5:06:49 PM PST
by
backhoe
(Has that "Clinton Legacy" made you feel safer yet?)
To: Barandth; Admin Moderator
We're not so much pro-war as much as your ilk are pro-dictator. BTW-why are you posting the first day you sign up?
23
posted on
02/04/2003 5:07:02 PM PST
by
Brett66
To: geedee
:-)
24
posted on
02/04/2003 5:08:00 PM PST
by
MJY1288
(In God we trust)
To: Barandth
Oh, brother.
Maybe you and your lilly-livered peacenik buds would rather a community containing your friends and family be poisoned before you understand that real Americans are going to put their lives on the line to protect your right to be such a cowering pu**y?
You have the right, but you don't have the spine.
25
posted on
02/04/2003 5:08:26 PM PST
by
ApesForEvolution
(This space for rent (Not accepting bids from the United Nations))
To: Barandth
Are you serious? You think that because Saddam does not have the capability to reach the US, that its ok if he bombs Israel, or Italy or Spain, perhaps? Or maybe you think that he will just use the WMD for a little blackmail, like Kim Jong Il? Maybe you don't care if Saddam gets the embargo lifted and makes moves to convert the Opec trading to the Euro, to ruin our economy? Maybe you are a leftist.
26
posted on
02/04/2003 5:11:27 PM PST
by
Eva
To: Brett66
And where oh where is Barandth? I want him/her to answer my question...ie Was there ever a war that you agreed with?(I myself was not fond of the Peloponesian war but most of them I liked)
27
posted on
02/04/2003 5:12:44 PM PST
by
woofie
(old age aint for sissies)
To: Barandth; Admin Moderator; All
Do you guys smell a hint of Ozone in the air?
28
posted on
02/04/2003 5:13:08 PM PST
by
Mad Dawgg
(Michael Jackson the other white meat.)
To: the_doc
We can and have made the case. Most journalists and all liberals are just idiots. This was written by a Vice president of the Cato Institute. The phantom capitol building for the pro-drug Libertarians on FR.
29
posted on
02/04/2003 5:13:20 PM PST
by
Dane
To: *war_list
30
posted on
02/04/2003 5:14:18 PM PST
by
Free the USA
(Stooge for the Rich)
To: Dane
Gee, I thought I (pro-life) was the only 'single issue' FReeper on this board....I was wrong....there's Dane (FR's Drug Warrior).
31
posted on
02/04/2003 5:15:14 PM PST
by
ApesForEvolution
(This space for rent (Not accepting bids from the United Nations))
To: Barandth
Would you be willing to go to war AFTER saddam unleashes a nuke or chemical weapon in your city?
To: Dane
The Cato institute is irrelevant on foreign policy issues because they are to isolationist. There foreign policy is one of paralysis by analysis.
33
posted on
02/04/2003 5:17:50 PM PST
by
Eva
To: Indy Pendance
Of course it wouldn't. Communist little people only come to power following closely behind tyrants. Which is all the more reason to eliminate the enemy by all means necessary.
34
posted on
02/04/2003 5:18:22 PM PST
by
ApesForEvolution
(This space for rent (Not accepting bids from the United Nations))
To: jwalsh07
One of the reasons I want to see Saddam gone is because of those we lost in the Gulf War, They would be spinning in their graves to think we put up with Saddam's BS this long. If we don't enforce the cease-fire agreements and the 17 U.N. Resolutions, then they gave their lives for absolutely nothing.
To me that is Job #1
35
posted on
02/04/2003 5:18:41 PM PST
by
MJY1288
(In God we trust)
To: MJY1288
An excellent reason.
36
posted on
02/04/2003 5:19:41 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: MJY1288
WADR MJY, but *SCREW* the UN and its resolutions...some day, they will be writing resolutions against America.
37
posted on
02/04/2003 5:20:44 PM PST
by
ApesForEvolution
(This space for rent (Not accepting bids from the United Nations))
To: ApesForEvolution; Wolfie; MrLeRoy
Gee, I thought I (pro-life) was the only 'single issue' FReeper on this board....I was wrong....there's Dane (FR's Drug Warrior) You forgot Wolfie and MrLeRoy. FR's resident "pot is the savior for the world" posters.
Anyway, this appeasment article coming from a Vice President of the Cato Institute is very enlightening to the true cause of the Cato institute(appeasment, drugs, etc.etc.). IMHO.
38
posted on
02/04/2003 5:22:11 PM PST
by
Dane
To: Barandth
Having fun on the Internet I see.
39
posted on
02/04/2003 5:22:25 PM PST
by
SeeRushToldU_So
( Something witty, etc, etc....)
To: Barandth
>>>I am posting this article because I agree with it, and I would like to hear some other thoughts on it.Many FReepers on this thread, have shown that you and the writer, Ted Galen Carpenter, are dead wrong on this subject matter.
I also see you signed up on Febuary 5th., which would lead me to believe a possible connection with some Middle East or European fanatical anti-war organization. May be, you're even a supporter of Saddam and Usama. Who knows.
Anyway you slice it, you're wrong!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-145 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson