Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ritter in Japan Drumming up Anti-US Sentiment
Daily Yomiuri ^ | 2/5/03 | Leo Fransella

Posted on 02/05/2003 12:40:26 PM PST by Defiant

Ex-weapons inspector warns against Iraq war

Leo Fransella Special to The Daily Yomiuri

As U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell prepared to present evidence to the U.N. Security Council on allegations Iraq has weapons of mass destruction Wednesday, a former chief U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq slammed U.S. moves to attack Iraq and warned of serious repercussions for Japan if an attack goes ahead.

Scott Ritter, 42, speaking at the Foreign Correspondents' Club of Japan in Tokyo, said that there was no evidence that Iraq had acquired weapons of mass destruction since 1998, when the earlier team of U.N. inspectors he led left Iraq, and that the best way to guarantee that Iraq disarms is to give the latest team of inspectors time to do their work.

Ritter, a former U.S. marine who took part in 52 weapons inspections in Iraq between 1991 and 1998--leading 14 of them--accused the United States of breaking international law by seeking a regime change in Iraq.

"I didn't take an oath to obey the (U.S.) president blindly. That's what a good German did in the 1940s," he said, denying that his campaign to "wage peace" is unpatriotic.

Ritter also argued that North Korea will not sit back while the United States removes Saddam Hussein's regime and then turns its attention to North Korea, which along with Iran, makes up U.S. President George W. Bush's "axis of evil."

The ramification of U.S. policy toward Iraq is that North Korea may launch preemptive strikes on Japan, he added.

Ritter called on Japanese to "get engaged. What's happening in the Middle East does have an impact on Japan.

"The Japanese should never underestimate the impact they can have on the United States, by standing up and saying no. The American public will pay heed to that, and the one way to stop this war is for Bush to wake up one morning and find that by going to war he's a one-term president."



Copyright 2003 The Yomiuri Shimbun




TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; pedophile; ritter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last
This guy Ritter just won't quit. Note that there is no mention of his prediliction for little girls.
1 posted on 02/05/2003 12:40:26 PM PST by Defiant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Defiant
Maybe his next stop is Bangkok...
2 posted on 02/05/2003 12:43:42 PM PST by Brian Mosely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
Ritter is a punk.
3 posted on 02/05/2003 12:44:18 PM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Hide your daughters alert.
4 posted on 02/05/2003 12:44:29 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Defiant
In his response today to Powell, one of the Iraqi officials suggested we speak with Ritter regarding the truth.
6 posted on 02/05/2003 12:45:31 PM PST by maranatha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
Ritter sounds like a real whore. His game must be money. Wonder if he is on the Dem payroll.
7 posted on 02/05/2003 12:45:47 PM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
He's been looking at anime porn and got an idea.

Who pays for these trips?

8 posted on 02/05/2003 12:45:55 PM PST by AppyPappy (Will Code COBOL For Food)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
One of the Iraqi spokesman used Ritter as a source of proof that they do not have WMD
9 posted on 02/05/2003 12:46:12 PM PST by twyn1 (God Bless America !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
"I didn't take an oath to obey the (U.S.) president blindly. That's what a good German did in the 1940s,"
10 posted on 02/05/2003 12:46:32 PM PST by EggsAckley (new public school motto: Aspire to Mediocrity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
Who's paying for this yahoo to fly all over the world?
I guess Marines make alot more than I thought ;-)
11 posted on 02/05/2003 12:47:26 PM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
"I didn't take an oath to obey the (U.S.) president blindly. That's what a good German did in the 1940s," he said, denying that his campaign to "wage peace" is unpatriotic.

Far from being a "good German," I'd say Ritter's present role is that of Saddam's Joseph Goebbels (Hitler's Minister for Propaganda).

Somebody shred this guy's passport while he's out of the country.

12 posted on 02/05/2003 12:47:39 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
Aw common folks. Give him a break. He may be there touring grade schools in his quest to make sure those girls get everything that's coming to them.
13 posted on 02/05/2003 12:47:56 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
Another a**hole comparing President Bush to Hitler.

Maybe Scott should just stay in Japan. He obviously hates this country, and that would be one less of his ilk attempting to molest our daughters.

14 posted on 02/05/2003 12:48:43 PM PST by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: twyn1
Subject: All Queda Interview.... Scary?



> The following interview was conducted by a reporter
> for the Al-Jazeera network with the third-in-command
> of the Al Queda organization, Mr. Mohammed
> Al-Asuquf.
> Al-Asuquf's background is impressive; a doctorate
> in physics and masters in international economics.
> In
> the interview, he talks of Al Queda's plans with
> total
> detachment, with deep knowledge and an unshakeable
> commitment to his cause. This interview was sent to
> Abel-Bari Atwan, chief editor of Al Quds, an
> Arabic-language newspaper published in London, but
> was
> never printed, due to its highly revealing
> [inflammatory?]contents. A copy of the interview
> came
> to Foz-do-Iguacu, and was translated into Portuguese
> by a university professor in the city's Arab
> community. This is probably the only existing
> version
> of this interview not in Arabic.
>
> Al-Jazeera: What is the objective of the Al Queda
> network?
> Al-Asuquf: To destroy the Great Satan, that is, the
> United States and Israel.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Why?
> Al-Asuquf: The USA over the past 60 years has been
> impregnating [infecting] the world with its
> arrogance,
> greed and malfeasance.
> It is the incarnation of all that is evil. The
> people
> of this planet don't deserve this torture.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Isn't this view somewhat one-sided?
> Al-Asuquf: No; one only has to observe recent
> events.
> The disrespect of the Kyoto treaty; the case of the
> Permanent Court of International Justice, their
> inaction with regards to our Palestinian brothers;
> the
> financial greed and absurd speculations in Third
> World
> countries; the complete indifference to other
> oppressed people and countless other situations
> which
> all of the world's leaders well know. And on top of
> all that, the Bush doctrine of "shoot first and ask
> questions later." This is an unacceptable abuse and
> will therefore have very grave consequences.
>
> Al-Jazeera: But the isn't the development and
> influence of America the fruit of its own
> competence?
> Al-Asuquf: Competence in extortion, competence in
> subjugation, competence in lying. After the Second
> World War, the USA was the only industrialized
> country
> with its manufacturing infrastructure intact.
> Loaning
> money like a good loan shark, it ended up becoming a
> very rich and powerful country; however, its greed
> remained undiminished.
> Today, Americans live like Maharajas [King], wasting
> more than any other people, spending more than 880
> billion per year just on gambling. They've lost any
> notion of spiritualityand live in constant sin. With
> each passing day the USA demonstrates that it
> doesn't
> know how to live with other peoples; for this, it
> deserves destruction.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Wouldn't it be easier to simply
> assassinate
> President George Bush?
> Al-Asuquf: In the first place, it would do no good,
> other than turning him into a martyr. When you face
> a
> powerful enemy, the best strategy is not to kill
> him,
> but to make him lose his leadership due to his
> incompetence, and let him live to watch this unfold.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Does the Al Queda network have the
> military capacity to make war on the United States?
> Al-Asuquf: If we analyze history, we will see that
> all
> great wars, before they were started, were based on
> previously established concepts [of war].
> But if we observe well, we will see that these
> concepts and strategies came to nothing, since a new
> type of war was ultimately waged. An example is the
> construction of the Maginot line by the French
> before
> the First World War, which, in reality proved to be
> completely useless against the invading forces.
> Aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines, and spy
> satellites will be useless in the next war.
>
> Al-Jazeera: American authorities hold more than
> 1,000
> people suspected of terrorism since September 11th.
> Won't this compromise Al Queda's plans?
> Al-Asuquf: Of those imprisoned, perhaps 20 to 30
> percent belong to Al Queda. Moreover, they are from
> the second echelon. We have more than 500 members of
> the first echelon and 800 from the second, inside
> the
> United States.
>
> Al-Jazeera: What do you mean by first and second
> echelons?
> Al-Asuquf: In the first echelon are Al Queda members
> who have been in the United States for more than 10
> years, many married with children. They have
> detailed
> knowledge of our plans and are just waiting for a
> phone call. They are also known as "sleepers." Those
> of the second echelon have arrived in the last five
> years and have no idea of plans.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Are even those who are married, with
> children, ready to die with their families?
> Al-Asuquf: Yes. All of them are ready to die. Long
> live
> September 11th..
>
> Al-Jazeera: What was September 11th to Al Queda's
> overall plans?
> Al-Asuquf: As a general step, it was just the
> beginning. It was a way of calling the world's
> attention to what is still to come.
>
> Al-Jazeera: How many members does Al Queda have?
> Al-Asuquf: In the first echelon, about 5,000; in the
> second, about 20,000, all over the world.
>
> Al-Jazeera: In the detention camp at Guantanamo, are
> there any members of the first echelon?
> Al-Asuquf: No, in fact, many of those there are not
> even Al Queda members.
>
> Al-Jazeera: How does Al Queda intend to destroy the
> most powerful nation in history?
> Al-Asuquf: It's a question of logistics. Using its
> own
> poison, that is, attacking the heart of what they
> consider the most important thing in the world:
> money.
>
> Al-Jazeera: How so?
> Al-Asuquf: The American economy is an economy of
> false
> appearances. There is no real economic ballast to
> the
> American economy. The American GDP of is something
> around 810 trillion, of which just 1 percent
> represents agriculture, and just 24 percent
> represents
> industry. Therefore, 75 percent of the American GDP
> is
> service and most of this is financial speculation.
> For those who understand economics, and it appears
> that the American Secretary of the Treasury, Paul
> O'Neil, doesn't or doesn't see it, it's enough to
> say
> that the USA acts like a huge "dot-com," and
> dollars,
> strictly speaking, are its shares.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Can you explain that?
> Al-Asuquf: The value of a company's shares is
> directly
> proportional to the profitability of the enterprise.
> When a business is just a service provider and
> doesn't
> produce any durable goods, the value of its shares
> depends on its credibility. Which is to say that if
> the credibility of the USA were shaken, its shares
> (the dollar) would fall with incredible rapidity and
> the entire American economy would begin to collapse.
>
> Al-Jazeera: How can you be so sure of this?
> Al-Asuquf: On a smaller scale, it's exactly what
> large
> financial groups do to the countries of the third
> world
> to reap profits in one month that Swiss banks
> couldn't
> get in four or five years.
>
> Al-Jazeera: So how will Al Queda shock the American
> economy to this point?
> Al-Asuquf: By provoking a deficit of between 850 and
> 870 trillion dollars, the equivalent of the United
> States' GDP for five to seven years.
>
> Al-Jazeera: How will this be done?
> Al-Asuquf: With the destruction of the seven largest
> American cities, along with other measures.
>
> Al-Jazeera: By what means will this be done?
> Al-Asuquf: Using atomic bombs.
>
> Al-Jazeera: With all of the security in the USA,
> how,
> hypothetically, will these bombs be smuggled onto
> American soil?
> Al-Asuquf: They won't be smuggled in, they're
> already
> there.
>
> Al-Jazeera: What are you saying?
> Al-Asuquf: There are already seven nuclear devices
> on
> American soil which were put in place before
> September
> 11th and are ready to be detonated.
>
> Al-Jazeera: How did they get in to the USA?
> Al-Asuquf: Before September 11, American security
> was
> a
> fiasco, and even after, were it necessary, we could
> manage to smuggle bombs into the United States. They
> entered through seaports, as normal cargo.
>
> Al-Jazeera: How is that possible?
> Al-Asuquf: A nuclear device is no bigger than a
> refrigerator; therefore, it can be easily
> camouflaged
> as one. Millions of cargo containers arrive in
> seaports each day, and no matter how efficient
> security is, it's impossible to check, search
> through
> and examine each container.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Where did these atomic bombs come from?
> Al-Asuquf: They were purchased on the black market.
>
> Al-Jazeera: From whom?
> Al-Asuquf: We bought five from the defunct Soviet
> Union and two more from Pakistan.
>
> Al-Jazeera: How is it possible to buy an atomic
> bomb?
> Isn't theresecurity?
> Al-Asuquf: Before 1989 it was practically
> impossible,
> however after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the
> Russian
> army began a process of self destruction, and some
> high generals began to lose their privileges,and
> therefore, highly susceptible to corruption. Even
> General Lebeb, now deceased, and Hans Blix, the head
> of the arms inspection commission of the United
> Nations, have stated this, notwithstanding denials
> by
> Russian Defense Minister Seguey Ivanov.
>
> Al-Jazeera: How much does a nuclear bomb cost?
> Al-Asuquf: Somewhere around 8200 million.
>
> Al-Jazeera: How did Al Queda get this money?
> Al-Asuquf: We have numerous sponsors.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Who are they?
> Al-Asuquf: There are a number of countries which
> support us, and also numerous wealthy individuals.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Are all of these countries Arab?
> Al-Asuquf: No, there are some European countries as
> well which have an interest in the fall of the USA.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Who are these wealthy individuals?
> Al-Asuquf: People who are also tired of watching the
> USA suck the wealth out of the rest of the world.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Is Saddam Hussein one of them?
> Al-Asuquf: You could say that he's just one of the
> collaborators, through Abdul Tawab Mullah Hawaish,
> his
> vice-prime minister and the person responsible for
> Iraq's arms program.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Are these atomic bombs powerful ones?
> Al-Asuquf: The five Russian devices are from the old
> T-3 missiles, also known as RD-107s, and their
> potency
> is
> something around 100 kilotons each, that is, 5 times
> as powerful as the Hiroshima bomb. The Pakistani
> bombs
> are less powerful, somewhere around 10 kilotons.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Can't the bombs be detected and disarmed
> by
> American authorities?
> Al-Asuquf: No, in spite of their age they've
> undergone
> modernization and are well hidden. Even if they
> were
> found, they have autodetonation provisions should
> anything get close to them. Even electromagnetic
> pulses
> would be incapable of deactivating them.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Don't they emit radiation? Can't they be
> detected?
> Al-Asuquf: No. They are wrapped in thick leaden
> cases.
>
> Al-Jazeera: A suspected Pakistani ship was recently
> searched and all that was found were lead bars. Does
> this have anything to do with the bombs?
>
> Al-Asuquf: Yes, however that lead was just an extra
> layer, and was not essentially necessary.
>
> Al-Jazeera: How will the bombs be detonated?
> Al-Asuquf: There are numerous methods, a cell-phone
> call, radio frequency, seismic shocks or by timer.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Once detonated, how many deaths will be
> caused by these bombs?
> Al-Asuquf: It depends, since our plans are very
> malleable.
>
> Al-Jazeera: So what is the entire plan?
> Al-Asuquf: The beginning will be the detonation of a
> nuclear device, which will cause the death of
> between
> 800 thousand and and one million peopleand create
> chaos on a scale never seen before. During this
> chaos,
> two or three cropsprayers that are now dismantled
> and
> stored in granaries [silos?] close to little-used
> highways in the countryside will take off on suicide
> missions to spray two or three large American cities
> with smallpox. That means that once the smallpox has
> been identified, all airports and seaports will be
> closed by quarantine. Land borders will likewise be
> shut down. Not one airplane, ship or vehicle will
> enter
> or leave the United States. This will cause total
> chaos. White House Press secretary Ari Fleischman
> will
> be very busy.
>
> Al-Jazeera: But the American government has
> guaranteed
> that within five days it could produce enough
> smallpox
> vaccine to inoculate the entire population.
> Al-Asuquf: There will be simultaneous suicide
> attacks
> against the vaccine production plants.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Which will be the first city?
> Al-Asuquf: The first city will be that in which
> optimal
> conditions present themselves, for example, clear
> skies, and winds of eight miles-per-hour or less in
> the direction of the country's center so that
> radioactive dust can contaminate the maximum
> possible
> area.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Will this attack annihilate the USA?
> Al-Asuquf: No. But the process will have begun. Who
> will buy food products from the United States
> knowing
> they may have been contaminated by radiation? Who
> will
> travel to the United States knowing the possibility
> of contracting smallpox? Who will continue to invest
> in
> American institutions? Just as with the World Trade
> Center, it will be simply a question of time before
> the entire economic structure collapses and turns to
> dust. If our objectives are reached with one bomb
> and
> the smallpox, probably we'll save the lives of
> others,
> however that's risky [unlikely?], and it's probable
> that six more bombs will be detonated, one per week,
> and other attacks with chemical weapons will be
> carried out.
>
> Al-Jazeera: How many innocent people will die?
> Al-Asuquf: According to estimates made by me and
> Ayman
> Al-Zawahiro, somewhere around 15 million due to the
> atomic bombs and their radiation. Of those exposed
> to
> smallpox, 25 percent will die, approximately five
> million, and many more due to the ensuing chaos and
> disorder.
>
> Al-Jazeera: What about the American military
> response?
> Al-Asuquf: There will practically be none. Even if
> five or ten cities were chosen at random to be
> destroyed, that would still be a small price to pay.
> The problem is the economic despair will be so great
> that even economizing by not using arms
> unnecessarily
> will occur, since the liquidity of American goods
> will
> be almost zero and at that point the United States
> will
> make more selling its Nimitz-class aircraft
> carriers,
> which cost about five billion dollars, to Turkey or
> Italy for one billion dollars, since the country
> will
> so urgently need to recapitalize, though it will be
> too
> late. Moreover, how will the morale of American
> soldiers be knowing that their entire families have
> died and their country no longer exists. Fight
> for what?
>
> Al-Jazeera: And won't the global economy also be
> ruined?
> Al-Asuquf: In the beginning it will be very
> difficult;
> a serious economic crisis will ensue. However,
> without
> the United States, the world will soon arise in a
> more
> just and fraternal manner.
>
> Al-Jazeera: And Israel?
> Al-Asuquf: As they say... it will be dessert.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Does bin Laden's spokesman, Sulaiman Abu
> Gheith, know that you are giving this interview?
> Al-Asuquf: It was he and bin Laden who suggested I
> give it.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Osama bin Laden is still alive?
> Al-Asuquf: He is quite healthy, alongside his
> commanders Mohammed Atef and Khalid Shaik Mohammed
> and
> Mullah Omar.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Aren't you fearful that Al Queda's plans
> will be discovered?
> Al-Asuquf: The plan is already in its countdown, and
> nothing can stop it.
>
> Al-Jazeera: Not even if the United States asks
> forgiveness and changes its attitudes?
> Al-Asuquf: That won't happen, and even if it did,
> it's
> too late.
>
> Al-Jazeera: When will the attack begin?
> Al-Asuquf: I can't reveal that. Allah Akbar.
>
>
15 posted on 02/05/2003 12:49:10 PM PST by FreeFireBorderZone (Comment sought on this please Al-Jazeera/ Al Queda Interview?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely
Bingo. Tolling for 8 year olds.
16 posted on 02/05/2003 12:50:21 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FreeFireBorderZone
This (the interview about the 7 nuclear weapons) was shown to be a hoax months ago.
17 posted on 02/05/2003 12:51:04 PM PST by Defiant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Defiant; aristeides
"I didn't take an oath to obey the (U.S.) president blindly. That's what a good German did in the 1940s," he said, denying that his campaign to "wage peace" is unpatriotic.

This guy is losing it. He has to go outside our borders to make a buck now. Isn't he real close to being legally charged with sedition or some similar charges?

18 posted on 02/05/2003 12:51:24 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
said that there was no evidence that Iraq had acquired weapons of mass destruction since 1998, when the earlier team of U.N. inspectors he led left Iraq,

Oh, dear, on the very day Colin Powell unveils those damning tapes and photos!

and that the best way to guarantee that Iraq disarms is to give the latest team of inspectors time to do their work.

And Powell further states the inspectors have been compromised.

I await Ritter being dealt with as would be appropriate. The Iraqis sure seem fond of him

BTW, Sen. Kyl was asked by Shep Smith point blank a little while ago if they had any info that Ritter is owned by Iraq. Kyl declined to say yea-----or nay.

19 posted on 02/05/2003 12:52:08 PM PST by cyncooper (God be with President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
Ritter in Japan Drumming up Anti-US Sentiment

And picking up some choice examples of the naughty-tentacles subgenre of anime, no doubt.

20 posted on 02/05/2003 12:53:53 PM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
sedition or some similar charges?

In the real world he would be. Clinton changed all that.

21 posted on 02/05/2003 12:54:26 PM PST by EggsAckley (new public school motto: Aspire to Mediocrity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
I'm surprised the Japanese let child molesters into the country

So9

22 posted on 02/05/2003 12:56:02 PM PST by Servant of the Nine (Republican's for Sharpton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
Wonder how many pictures and tapes Saddam has showing Ritter and his passion for little girls?

Ritter is acting like a man who is on a life-saving mission...his own.

sw

23 posted on 02/05/2003 12:56:26 PM PST by spectre (spectre's wife (Big man on Campus, huh Ritter?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
Well, I think this qualifies as being a traitor - he is actively recruiting countries to go against the U.S. actions.

Just who does he think he is and why would they ever listen to this hasbeen or neverwas?

So, he expects them to discount the Secretary of State, the President of the U.S., the Defense Secretary, the Vice-President of the U.S. and listen to a former inspector that has been arrested for seeking young girls on the internet?

Yeah, sure.
24 posted on 02/05/2003 12:57:12 PM PST by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
...accused the United States of breaking international law by seeking a regime change in Iraq.

"I didn't take an oath to obey the (U.S.) president blindly..."

No, Ritter took an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, NOT "international law", which has no hold over the United States or our interests and security.

But, Ritter already knows he is a traitor. He has been providing aid and comfort to Iraq for a couple of years now. In another time, he'd be shot on the White House lawn...

25 posted on 02/05/2003 12:57:26 PM PST by SunStar (Democrats Piss Me Off !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Here's another story, with Ritter's "expert" analysis of the North Korea situation thrown in:

Feb. 5

— TOKYO (Reuters) - A former U.N. weapons inspector and outspoken critic of U.S. policy on Iraq said Wednesday he expected war to break out by the end of February and that Pyongyang would likely seize the opportunity to attack Japan and South Korea.

Scott Ritter, a former U.S. Marine who spent seven years as a weapons inspector in Iraq in the 1990s, told journalists in Tokyo that a narrow, U.S.-led coalition would likely launch an attack on Iraq after failing to persuade the United Nations of the need for military action.

"I see a massive aerial bombardment beginning by the end of February," he said. "I see ground troops crossing into Iraq in significant numbers in early March, and I don't see this war finishing any time soon."

Secretary of State Colin Powell is due to speak before the U.N. Security Council at 10:30 a.m. EST in an attempt to persuade the world that Iraq is concealing weapons of mass destruction.

Russia, China and France -- which have powers of veto -- are uncertain about a war that might spark more instability in the Middle East.

An attack on Iraq might also alarm the isolated state of North Korea into a pre-emptive strike on U.S. troops and their allies in Asia, Ritter said.

"North Korea, having seen the United States eliminate Iraq in violation of international law, is not going to simply sit back and wait for the Americans to come," he said.

"They won't be satisfied till Tokyo is reduced to a slab of radioactive waste."

The United States reported last autumn that Pyongyang had admitted to possessing weapons of mass destruction. North Korea withdrew from a nuclear non-proliferation treaty last month and ordered U.N. atomic energy inspectors out of the country.

U.S. bombers, fighter jets and warships have been put on alert for possible deployment to the western Pacific to deter any aggression by North Korea in the event of a war in Iraq.

26 posted on 02/05/2003 12:59:33 PM PST by Defiant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
Ritter must be forgetting that Japan allows extradition of felons out of there country. If he was a smart man, he'd be hiding out. Oh, but maybe thats why he's become saddams mouth piece, maybe Saddam found out about his love of little girls and was holding that tidbit over his head. Nah, Ritter is just a spineless weasel who likes to pick on little ones who can't defend themselves.
27 posted on 02/05/2003 1:00:32 PM PST by Cate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cate
oooppss,,,, there= their
28 posted on 02/05/2003 1:01:09 PM PST by Cate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Bingo. Tolling for 8 year olds.

Let's be fair to the pedophile. We are only certain that this pervert tries to sexually molest 14-16 year olds.

29 posted on 02/05/2003 1:01:14 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
Scott Ritter, 42, speaking at the Foreign Correspondents' Club of Japan in Tokyo, said that there was no evidence that Iraq had acquired weapons of mass destruction since 1998, when the earlier team of U.N. inspectors he led left Iraq, and that the best way to guarantee that Iraq disarms is to give the latest team of inspectors time to do their work.

This assumes a couple of things.

1) said that there was no evidence that Iraq had acquired weapons of mass destruction since 1998 This assumes that in 1998 Iraq had no WMD. Thus, having not obtained any since then there is no need to disarm.

2) and that the best way to guarantee that Iraq disarms is to give the latest team of inspectors time to do their work. This assumes that Iraq has WMD and that allowing the inspectors more time will cause Iraq to disarm.

So which is it Ritter? Do they, or do they not have WMD? And if the answer is that they have them and thus the inspectors are needed to assure they disarm then they are in violation of Resolution 1441 and their weapons declaration was a total fabrication. Which, under Resolution 1441 authorizes the United States and alley nations to attack.

30 posted on 02/05/2003 1:01:37 PM PST by Phantom Lord (No Remorse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
lol you guys beat me to it,,,,he has a little asian school girl fetish.
31 posted on 02/05/2003 1:02:20 PM PST by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
Here's another story

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030205/ap_wo_en_po/as_gen_japan_weapons_inspector_3
32 posted on 02/05/2003 1:03:47 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
If we have info on why this guy is carrying Saddam's water, we need to release it, and get this guy in jail for treason. He's done far more harm than Johnny Taliban. Just look at the propaganda effect he's having in Japan.
33 posted on 02/05/2003 1:09:26 PM PST by Defiant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
I wonder if Ritter's getting instructions to go to Japan has anything to do with the increasingly clear cooperation between North Korea and Iraq.
34 posted on 02/05/2003 1:09:41 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
I hope Scott can stay focused.

Run, run, Ritter, Ritter!

35 posted on 02/05/2003 1:10:43 PM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeFireBorderZone
His economic analysis is pretty astute and cogent. It means we should rise to make oursleves nearly invulnerable to his planned economic assault, where by all economic history and logic we are exactly as he says -- very vulnerable.

Time for a Jubilee Year!

36 posted on 02/05/2003 1:11:21 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
"Who pays for these trips?"

That was my EXACT reaction.

This guy has a wife, 2 children, and no visible means of support, except for a few thousand dollars from speaking engagements and the documentary he is supposed to do. I think the budget was $200,000, but I have a hard time seeing that it will be as successful as, say, My Big Fat Greek Wedding. So he won't get much from that.
Maybe there is some family money financing this. If so, then what a shameful waste.

I can't wait to see the source of his income, which I feel certain that we will see, sometime down the road.


37 posted on 02/05/2003 1:12:30 PM PST by VMI70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider

"Look, I get text message from Ritter-san"

38 posted on 02/05/2003 1:13:32 PM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
I think North Korea is more of a threat to South Korea (ROK), than to Japan. Japan occupied the Koreas in the early 20th century.

I think China might be pulling the strings in some nefarious manner with how North Korea blusters and acts.

I think Taiwan is at risk if the Gulf War II is launched.

39 posted on 02/05/2003 1:15:52 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
His Japanese name is "Litter". Fitting.
40 posted on 02/05/2003 1:16:24 PM PST by Defiant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ
why would they ever listen to this hasbeen or neverwas?

The fact that he opposes the Bush Administration seems to be reason enough for those that grant him a platform.

41 posted on 02/05/2003 1:18:19 PM PST by cyncooper (God be with President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
In another time, he'd be shot on the White House lawn...

People like Ritter and Mandela had best watch their fiery words. A fellow Texan's daughter died 9-11 -- his eldest child and only daughter, named after his mother. Her death is still ripping him apart inside. It's rather scary to be around him when the pervert Ritter's on the news. He never says anything, but his jaws lock down and his eyes squint to BB-sized pinholes. Ritter wouldn't last a minute if the two of them were ever in the same locale.

Some don't equate Iraq to 9-11. A bunch of Americans do. A whole bunch.

42 posted on 02/05/2003 1:18:27 PM PST by geedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
"Scott Ritter, 42, speaking at the Foreign Correspondents' Club of Japan in Tokyo, said that there was no evidence that Iraq had acquired weapons of mass destruction since 1998,....."

Yeah right.
Like I'm gonna believe anything that this idiot has to say.

43 posted on 02/05/2003 1:18:51 PM PST by Ouachita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeFireBorderZone
Start praying, folks. If this is true, we need God's protection more than ever.
44 posted on 02/05/2003 1:19:43 PM PST by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
It's a hoax, Mary. But we still need prayer for what is to come. There will undoubtedly be setbacks along the way, but Bush is right to confront this evil now not later.
45 posted on 02/05/2003 1:22:27 PM PST by Defiant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
I suppose what I was trying to say in my meandering #39 reply was that I don't get the Japan connection?
46 posted on 02/05/2003 1:22:28 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
IT CAN"T BE A SCOTT RITTER THREAD WITHOUT.........

***BACK BY POPULAR DEMAND***

Baby Got Back
with apologies to Sir Mix-A-Lot

Oh my god, Becky, look at her
She's Soooo Young....
She looks like one of Scott Ritter's girlfriends
Who understands those weapons inspectors anyway...
He only talks to her because she looks like a total pre-teen, ok?
I mean her chest, it's just so flat
I can't believe it's soooo flat
It's just, like, non-existent
I mean, her and Scott..It's gross!
Like, she only just turned fourteen...

I like young girls and I can not lie
Even the undercover cops can't deny
That when a teen girl walks in
with an itty bitty chest
And some peachfuzz in my face
I get sprung
Wanna pull up front
Cuz I notice that bra was stuffed
Deep in the training bra she's wearing
I'm hooked and I can't stop staring
Oh, baby I wanna get with ya
And take your picture
The Police tried to warn me
But with that young butt you got
Me so horny!

Ooh, rub all of that smooth skin
You say you wanna get in my Benz
Well use me, use me, cuz you
just barely reached puberty.

I've seen them at school dancin'
The hell with romancin!
She sweat, wet, member of 8th grade set.

I'm tired of magazines
sayin a man with a teen is a bad, bad, thing
Take the average pedophile and ask him that
He'll say she's gotta be flat, so

Fellas (yeah), fellas (yeah)
Has she got a jail-bait butt? (hell yeah)
Well tell her to shake it, shake it, shake it, shake it,
shake that jail-bait butt.
Baby got Back

(Angel face with Junior High booty)

I like'em young and small
Up against the Bugerking Bathroom wall
I just can't help myself
I'm actin like an animal
Now here's my scandal

I wanna get you to the bathroom stall
And ugh, double ugh, ugh
I ain't talkin' bout Playboy
Cuz older women were made for boys
I wannem real young and supple
With the Olsen twins, I'd take a double
Uh oh! Scotty's in trouble!
Beggin' for a piece of that lil' bubble
So I'm lookin' at a Britney Spears video
Watchin' this bimbo walkin' like a hoe
You can have that bimbo
I'd take Britney's little sister though
A word of warning to you mothers and fathers
I wanna get with your teenage daughters
I won't cus or hit em
But I gotta be straight when I say I wanna spank
my monkey in the Burgerking john.
Baby, I got it goin on
The Police won't like this song
Cuz them punks want to cuff and stuff me
But I'd rather stay and play
Cuz I'm long and I'm strong
Wanna get my weapon-of-mass-destruction on

So chicks...(Yeah), chicks (yeah)
Do you wanna watch me play with my little stick? (yeah)
Then turn around
Pull it out
Even chunky old white men got to shout
Baby got back

(Angel face with the Junior-High booty)

Yeah baby
When it comes to females
The law and got nothin to do with my selection
36-24-36
Only if she's 14

If your not old enough to drive a Honda
Never heard of workout tapes by Fonda
Then your old enough for the back seat of my Honda.
My anaconda don't want none unless you've got a curfew hon
You can do side bends or sit-ups, but please don't grow up
Boy's your age wanna play that nintendo
and tell you that your chest needs to grow
So they toss it and leave it
And I pull up quick to retrieve it
So the judge says you're too young
Well that ain't the song I sung
Cuz your waist is small and
your lack of curves is kickin'
And I'm thinkin' bout stickin'
To the twenty-something dames in the magazines
You ain't it Miss Thang
Give me your little sister I can't resist her
can't keep her out too late or momma might miss her
Some prosecuting attorney tried to dis
Cuz young girls were on my AOL chat list
He had game but he chose to forget em
So I'll keep pulling up quick to get with 'em
So ladies if your Mom and Dad just left town
And you wanna triple X throw down
Dial 1-900-Scudalot and kick them nasty thoughts
Baby got back
47 posted on 02/05/2003 1:28:11 PM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: Defiant
"Ritter called on Japanese to "get engaged. What's happening in the Middle East does have an impact on Japan."

This could actually help -- could shame the Japanese some and get them more engaged with the real USA, not kooks.

49 posted on 02/05/2003 1:30:39 PM PST by unspun (Somebody set up us the bomb !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
Note that there is no mention of his prediliction for little girls.

Of course not. Japan is the pedophile's Mecca - they only stopped distributing child porn pretty recently, after much pressure, and probably half-heartedly.

50 posted on 02/05/2003 1:30:50 PM PST by Cachelot (~ In waters near you ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson