120 Cities Most at Risk [Surviving Terrorism]

Surviving Terrorism.com ^ | 2-10-03 | Jarret B. Wollstein

[Salvation]

Order NOW! | Affiliates | Support

120 Cities Most at Risk
Of Terrorist Attacks

For the past few years, the federal government has been providing training and assistance to police and emergency response workers in the 120 cities considered most at risk of terrorist attacks. A complete list of those cities appears at the end of this report.

As you will see, the list includes major government centers (Philadelphia, Miami, Sacramento, Washington, D.C.), cities with extensive industry (Detroit, Houston, San Jose), major business centers (Chicago, Miami, Philadelphia), important media centers (New York, Los Angeles, Washington, D.C.), major seaports (Newport News, Oakland, San Diego, Tampa), and important military facilities (Colorado Springs, Honolulu, Long Beach, Norfolk, San Francisco).

The federal government is providing extensive training for police and emergency workers in these 120 cities, including preparation for conventional (e.g., bomb), biological, chemical, and radiological (“dirty bomb”) attacks. However ...

Are the “At Risk Cities” Now Prepared?

The short answer is no, they are not. So if you live in or within 50 miles of these cities, you should consider yourself at significant risk for the duration of the War on Terror, which President Bush says could last as long as 50 years.

Fifty miles should be considered the minimal safe distance from an “at risk” city. The reason is that in event of even a small radiological or nuclear attack (5-20 kiloton weapon), lethal radiation and fallout will be carried by prevailing winds at least that far. In plain English, if the winds are blowing away from you, you will probably survive if you are 10-20 miles away. However, if winds are blowing toward you, you will probably be dead in a few days. Similarly, in event of a major biological attack, winds and fleeing survivors could easily carry pathogens at least 50 miles.

In the event a more serious attack, you may need to be as much as 100-300 miles away from a target city to survive.

While the government is now attempting to train emergency personnel in the 120 cities at greatest risk, please recognize it will take many years before most cities are even minimally prepared. Even then, government assistance is absolutely no guarantee that there will be enough drugs, water and food to go around for everyone in the event of a radiological, nuclear, or biological attack, which could put hundreds of thousands, even millions of people at risk. In many cases, the consequences will be nationwide.

Furthermore, there are many biological weapons for which no effective treatments exist, and the only protection is to not be anywhere in the area when people are exposed, and to get out before you and your family are exposed.

Also, in a crisis, expect emergency facilities—including hospitals and medical clinics —to be quickly overwhelmed. In fact, they are likely to be reservoirs of disease and contagion.

Dark Winter: What to Expect in the
Event of a Bioterrorist Attack

On June 22-23, 2001, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) conducted what they term “a senior-level war game” examining the likely consequences of a smallpox outbreak in the U.S. Again, let me emphasis this is an exercise based on high-level computer analysis and prediction, not an actual occurrence.

The results were alarming: During the exercise, smallpox was projected to spread to 25 states and 15 foreign countries. By the 13th day of the exercise, “A total of 16,000 smallpox cases have been reported in 25 states.” But that’s just the beginning.

By the end of the exercise, the National Security Council projects “that in worst-case conditions, the third generation of cases could conceivably comprise as many as 3,000,000 cases of smallpox and lead to as many as 1,000,000 deaths.” (“Shining Light on ‘Dark Winter’,” Center for Civilian Biodefense Strategies, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, Electronically published 19 February 2002.)

Other conclusions of the Dark Winter study:

• “States have restricted nonessential travel.”
• “Food shortages are growing in some places, and the national economy is suffering.”
• “Residents have fled and are fleeing cities where new cases emerge.”
• “Canada and Mexico have closed their borders to the United States.”
• “The public demands mandatory isolation of smallpox victims and their contacts, but identifying contacts has become logistically impossible.”
• “The individual actions of US citizens will be critical to ending the spread of contagious diseases.”

This last point to me is the most important lesson of Dark Winter: To survive you need to prepare in advance.

For more information on Dark Winter, check out the collection of articles here and here. The last link is from the University of Chicago.

120 Cities Most at Risk
State	City
Alabama	Birmingham
	Mobile
	Montgomery
Alaska	Anchorage
Arkansas	Little Rock
Arizona	Phoenix
	Mesa
	Tucson
California	Anaheim
	Bakersfield
	Fremont
	Fresno
	Glendale
	Huntington Beach
	Long Beach
	Los Angeles
	Modesto
	Oakland
	Riverside
	San Bernardino
	San Diego
	San Francisco
	Santa Ana
	San Jose
	Sacramento
	Stockton
Colorado	Aurora
	Colorado Springs
	Denver
District of Columbia	Washington
Florida	Fort Lauderdale
	Hialeah
	Jacksonville
	Miami
	Orlando
	St. Petersburg
	Tampa
Georgia	Atlanta
	Columbus
Hawaii	Honolulu
Illinois	Chicago
Indiana	Fort Wayne
	Indianapolis
Iowa	Des Moines
Kansas	Kansas City
	Wichita
Kentucky	Lexington
	Louisville
Louisiana	Baton Rouge
	Metaire
	New Orleans
	Shreveport
Maryland	Baltimore
Massachusetts	Boston
	Springfield
	Worcester
Michigan	Detroit
	Grand Rapids
	Warren
Minnesota	Minneapolis
	St. Paul
Mississippi	Jackson
Missouri	Kansas City
	St. Louis
Nebraska	Lincoln
	Omaha
Nevada	Las Vegas
New Jersey	Jersey City
	Newark
New Mexico	Albuquerque
New York	Buffalo
	New York
	Rochester
	Syracuse
	Yonkers
North Carolina	Charlotte
	Greensboro
	Raleigh
Ohio	Akron
	Cincinnati
	Cleveland
	Columbus
	Dayton
	Toledo
Oklahoma	Oklahoma City
	Tulsa
Oregon	Portland
Pennsylvania	Philadelphia
	Pittsburgh
Rhode Island	Providence
Tennessee	Chattanooga
	Knoxville
	Memphis
	Nashville
Texas	Amarillo
	Arlington
	Austin
	Corpus Christi
	Dallas
	El Paso
	Fort Worth
	Garland
	Houston
	Irving
	Lubbock
	San Antonio
Utah	Salt Lake City
Virginia	Arlington
	Chesapeake
	Newport News
	Norfolk
	Richmond
	Virginia Beach
Washington	Seattle
	Spokane
	Tacoma
Wisconsin	Madison
	Milwaukee

[Salvation]

I did a search for this list but did not find it under the words "120 cities"

FYI and speculation!

[RayBob]

Psst...here's a secret...don't tell anyone.

If you live in the United States, and live somewhere near any city, or if you fly on airplanes, or ride on trains, or buses, or drive a car over a bridge or through a tunnel, you are at risk of a terrorist attack.

If you eat lots of bacon and eggs, you are at risk of a heart attack.

If you eat lots of beans...gas attack risk.

If you drive past a McDonalds...that's right, a Big Mac Attack.

Don't watch Fox...that's When Animals Attack.

And worrying about which cities are most at risk will put you at risk of an anxiety attack.

Please don't take this as a flame. Its not directed at you but at whoever would pull out an atlas and make a list of the most populous cities in each state and call it a list of cities at risk.

[Hank Rearden]

Looks to me like they just made a list of every significant city they could think of in those states.

"Be careful near big cities." Not helpful.

[areafiftyone]

OH GREAT - I LIVE IN YONKERS AND WORK IN NYC - I got it coming and going! ;-)

[Tacis]

The bad guys and there stuff will come across the Mexican border and head up US 35 as far as the can go. No planes, few trains or busses. Stuff gets stored in those public storage places and the bad guys disappear into the local Muslim communities or leftist groups.

The correct list of cities actually tracks the major commercial freeways of the country. And, with our foolish refusal to seal the dangerous Mexican border, it is probably already too late.

[YOMO]

Kind of sounds like that Veterans Life commercial. "If you are a veteran, married to one, child of one, live next to one, wish you were one, etc........

[trebb]

Boy - if we all move at least 50 miles from the major cities, the tent makers will clean up. I wonder what kind of risk the "conclaves" will be under???

[ricpic]

"Other conclusions of the Dark Winter study:
.....the national economy will suffer."


Ya think?

[Living Free in NH]

OK, NOW I'm pissed off at these terrorist!!!! No city in beautiful New Hampshire is worthy of attack? Surely, Manchester or Nashua are better than Portland, Oregon.

[Myrnick]

Your response just about has the meter of a Jesse Jackson speech. I loved it!

[PAR35]

I thing you have identified the only criteria used. Several obvious targets in smaller locations are missing.

[chimera]

Looks to me like they just made a list of every significant city they could think of in those states.

You're right. Its just a list of largest city by state. Its like, each state has some cities that are of significant size, and those could be targets. Here they are...

Interesting as a 4th grade geography unit exercise, but otherwise not too helpful.

[TigersEye]

BLUE ZONE ALERT!...BLUE ZONE ALERT!...BLUE ZONE ALERT!...

[Rebelbase]

"8 year supply of dried fava beans."

If you have any Chianti i'm staying the h3ll away.

[JCEccles]

No cities listed for Wyoming or Idaho. Good.

[Alouette]

I find it pretty amusing that the threat for Michigan includes Warren (northern suburb of Detroit where GM Tech Center and US Army Tank Command is located) but not Dearborn (southern suburb of Detroit where Ford Motor and a gazillion Arabs are located).

[Robert A. Cook, PE]

OKay-

So when these "blue" counties get nuked and smallpoxed by Iraqi weapons, can we hold a new census early to replace the democratic Congressmen who no longer have constituents?

Better yet, can we arrange for the liberal/liar/democrat(but I repeat myself) Congressmen who are opposing action in the Mideast to BE in their districts when their people get killed?

[Salvation]

**Please don't take this as a flame.**

I'm not -- I was laughing all the way through your post!

[Salvation]

You do have an interesting comparison there between the auto makers.

Hmmmm. Maybe this guy drives a Ford.

[Salvation]

**So when these "blue" counties get nuked and smallpoxed by Iraqi weapons, can we hold a new census early to replace the democratic Congressmen who no longer have constituents?**

I like the way you think!

[savedbygrace]

So you're at risk if you live within 50 miles of one of these 120 cities, eh? Well, that pretty much covers at least 90% of the entire country, Sherlock. (Not you, Salvation, the author of this article.)

[Centurion2000]

Well this is going to get interesting.

[Geezerette]

You are so on target!

Notice the article above says that in the event of these dire predictions/possibilities, the Mexican border and Canadian border will be closed ... from the outside, of course! No more illegal aliens coming into the US!!

I can hear the 20/20 hindsight from the guv'mint now!!!

g in AZ

[Noumenon]

"No true patriot would leave his wine cellar unguarded in times like these."

[cincinnati65]

My first take is that it's interesting that Jacksonville, NC and Fayetteville, NC (Camp LeJeune and Fort Bragg, respectively) didn't appear on the list for North Carolina. Have a hard time believing this one.

[Arthalion]

Heh, it's quite funny to see my own hometown on that list. I somehow get the feeling that when the Islamofascists travel halfway around the world to set off a suitcase nuke and strike at the heart of the infidel, they'll find a better target than Modesto :\

[uncbuck]

When the sky falls, we'll all catch larks. irish proverb

[Destructor]

Oh, so you don't see this scenario as a possibility? I think you're suffering from an attack- of the dumbass!

[Freebird Forever]

Dearborn (southern suburb of Detroit where Ford Motor and a gazillion Arabs are located)

That city would be found on the list of municipalities comprising the "most at risk from a response to terrorism" group.

[Reeses]

11 Political Parties Most at Risk Of Terrorist Attacks

Should a terrorist attack wipe out an American city, the following political parties would not survive:

1. Democrat Party
2. Communist Party
3. Freedom Socialist Party
4. Green Party
5. Labor Party
6. New Union Party
7. Socialist Labor Party
8. Socialist Party
9. Workers Party
10. Workers World Party
11. Young Socialist Democrats

[Jumper]

History Book Test in 2025 reads: One Hunderd Twenty US Cities were destroyed by the Islamic Jihad was the complete unknown key to American Victory in the Ten Years Terrorism War and made the total collaspe of the Social Welfare States in Europe become more like the Asia and American. It was total destruction of the Democrat Voting base that allowed American to become united once again. Today the major political parties in the US are Repbulicans Right, Republicans Center, and the Greens:)

[MassExodus]

No city in beautiful New Hampshire is worthy of attack?

That's because they are launching their attacks from one of those three story tenaments along the river in Manchester.

[pepsi_junkie]

OK, NOW I'm pissed off at these terrorist!!!! No city in beautiful New Hampshire is worthy of attack? Surely, Manchester or Nashua are better than Portland, Oregon.

Actually, Portland is one of the new "hot" cities, as I understand it. Better to wonder why Newark, NJ made the list. Have you ever seen Newark? It would have to be one heck of an attack to even get noticed in that dump.

[laker_dad]

Darn! And I moved away from the Detroit area 17 years ago thinking I was going to be safer! Guess I'll have to move near Dearborn to be safe from the terror. LOL BTW is "Miller's Bar" still in Dearborn? They had the best "almost raw" burgers around...

[MadelineZapeezda]

Don't watch Fox...that's When Animals Attack.

Hey, Ray....LMAO

[MaryFromMichigan]

"120 Cities Most at Risk [Survinging Terrorism]"


Beaware of speling errors.
Also puncution

;¬)

[Salvation]

Good list!

[jpl]

This could be vey series!

[Salvation]

**It would have to be one heck of an attack to even get noticed in that dump.**

But how many of the Al-Qaeda terrorist lived in your backyard there?

[Koblenz]

Nothing in CT?

[HamiltonJay]

Terrorism is a real threat, to individuals.. the wrong person at the wrong place at the wrong time.. you can be dead. HOwever, in the greater scheme it is about more symbolic attacks than practical destruction. Look at their 9/11 attacks... Pentagon, WTC and likely Capitol Building. Pentagon was not going to be stopped by a plane, even its complete destruction would not stop the US military... so symbolic. Al Queda's own admittance they did not expect the WTC's to fall, only to be damaged, so the full economical effect of 9/11 was far greater than planned or expected by the terrorists, and the Capitol Building... this one if it had succeeded may have caused some serious political problems... but it is the only 1 of the 3 in my view that could have been anything more than political statement making.

There are so many simple ways terrorists could distrupt our economy or way of life... and I am almost certain none of these avenues are being explored. Because they won't cause spectacular press, or even large amounts of death, but would without question be economically and socially devastating. I won't mention any of them, no need to give out ideas.... but lets just say, while terrorism is a frightening prospect... like all ARAB military actions in the last 500 or more years... it won't have much overall impact and in its large scheme fail miserably.

[MadelineZapeezda]

Your search showed nothing because no one has "survinging" terrorism before! lol

[Redcloak]

Nothing worth attacking, I suppose.

[RayBob]

I'm mortally wounded! I've been called a dumbass! Oh, what shall I do?

Look, my point was that we are all at risk from a terrorist attack, no matter where we are. I also took a shot at humor, which apparently went over your head.

This list of the 120 cities most at risk is assinine. Podunk, TN is just as much at risk as New York City. The fact that major economic, business and population centers would be primary targets is about as obvious as the nose on your face.

Yes, this is always a possibility. So was the collapse of society due to the Y2K bug. Yes, you have to recognize the threat, but you also have to analyze the risk and plan accordingly. The fact remains that no matter how well you think you prepare, you either will have prepared for nothing, or have seriously underestimated the risk. How many people still have crates of canned food and bottled water in the basements? And if Y2K turned out to be be disaster that they thought it was, would those supplies have made that much of a difference for them in the long run? In otherwords, there's very little that you can do except live your life.

Look at the Isrealis. They have lived with the real threat of terrorism for 40 years. They recognize that each day could be their last. They see that they have two choices: to cower in fear in their basements waiting for death to come or to live their lives. They assess the risk and try to plan for it, but in the end, they go about their lives. Like the Isrealis, I choose to live my life.

[G L Tirebiter]

You have nailed it.

This reminds me of a speech made by a history prof. at a local college during the heyday of the Cold War.

He said our town (Winston-Salem, NC) was at special risk from a Russian nuke.

The reason: We were ground zero for cigarette production...If the Soviets knocked out the Winston, Camel, and Sir Walter Raleigh plants all the smokers would have nicotine fits and the U.S. would have to surrender.

The remarkable thing is that this nonsense was accepted as an important insight into Warsaw Pact strategy.

The real reason that Winston-Salem was so important is, of course, that is is the HQ of Krispy Kreme.

[Destructor]

"Yes, this is always a possibility. So was the collapse of society due to the Y2K bug. Yes, you have to recognize the threat, but you also have to analyze the risk and plan accordingly."

Well, now you're making sense! Anyone that thinks that the threat of terrorism has past is delusional.

[tuna_battle]

"No cities listed for Wyoming or Idaho. Good."

This is likely an error on their part. They forgot about these two states.

[RayBob]

The first part of my reply was my main point:

"If you live in the United States, and live somewhere near any city, or if you fly on airplanes, or ride on trains, or buses, or drive a car over a bridge or through a tunnel, you are at risk of a terrorist attack."

I stand by that statement. The rest was just my attempt at humor. The fact remains that every time you get behind the wheel of your car, you are at risk of being killed in an accident. You can't let fear paralyze you.