Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

As Mr Kissinger notes, within six months of Saigon's fall, a Cuban expeditionary force appeared in Angola. Soviet and Cuban adventurism across the Third World picked up substantially. Three years later, the Shah of Iran was toppled. Then US diplomats were taken hostage in Teheran

Those, btw, are the dominoes the liberals would tell you never fell, across Africa and Central America. Add the ongoing plight of Cambodia and Vietnam to the dominoes as well.

1 posted on 02/10/2003 4:21:44 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
2 posted on 02/10/2003 4:22:06 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Given that this guy is writing from Singapore, he should talk to Lee Kuan Yew about why we couldn't simply walk away from South Vietnam. And why, even though we lost, our efforts in Vietnam were still important because we bought time for other countries in the region such as Thailand, Singapore, the Phillipines, etc. to hold back the Communist menace.
3 posted on 02/10/2003 4:54:49 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Failure is not an option.
4 posted on 02/10/2003 4:54:51 PM PST by prairiebreeze ("We won't deny, ignore or pass our problems along to other Presidents" --GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Imagine the situation. A week from now, pressured by France, Germany and Russia, the US decides to give the United Nations inspectors more time.

Part of the Franco-Prussian-Flemish plan is to leave the US troops in the ME on standby.

This won't happen. If they don't go into Iraq, they will come home or move closer to NK.

5 posted on 02/10/2003 5:01:08 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Ridiculous.

I don't care how Bush gets what he wants.

If he bluffs it out of Saddam, so much the better.

If Saddam won't be budged and Bush takes him out, then that's the best, isn't it?
8 posted on 02/10/2003 5:14:27 PM PST by xzins (Babylon - You have been weighed in the balance and been found wanting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
"But with Iraq, the need to maintain resolve seems obvious. I cannot see how America can back down without damaging its, well, credibility."


Back down. We can't wait to watch the bombs fall on TV.

9 posted on 02/10/2003 5:47:10 PM PST by bulldogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
One thing is for certain Russia sticking its head into this will not stop the war machine from advancing to its objective this go round!
13 posted on 02/10/2003 8:26:06 PM PST by Soul Citizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson