ZOT! [Prime example of sleeper accounts: AM]

February 21, 2003

[jjm2111]

It might be my eyes, but doesn't the Marine in the football poster not have a magazine in his weapon?

Jarhead d'oh!

[AmishDude]

Receipt for a preference. Photos will help.

Color or B/W? What exactly would there be pictures of? Saddam with Chirac? We've got some of those. Would you like pictures of vats that say "ANTHRAX"? All we've got is ones that say "BABY MILK".

Which is, of course, proof that the vats contain only baby milk.

[RaceBannon]

I saw that too, but, still, it is a great poster! ")

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

Which is, of course, proof that the vats contain only baby milk.

Are you saying it's not?

: )

[antaresequity]

Here is some bycatch for you to clean up

[AmishDude]

It is essential to label baby milk properly so that it does not get confused with other kinds of milk.

[colorado tanker]

a zot just isn't a zot without the viking kittens

Oh, how true! I e-mailed the link to the viking kittens to my wife and daughters (non-freeper cat lovers) and they loved 'em! But they're even funnier in a Zot!

[AmishDude]

AM knows about dcwusmc. He doesn't appear to be a sleeper, except where it comes to his conscious mind.

[dcwusmc]

WHATEVER Saddam may have, in violation of his agreement that ended the LiveEx in '91, unless it can be shown beyond Dubya's rhetoric that he was involved in 9/11, is irrelevant to the war on TERRORISM. So far, we have nothing linking him to 9/11 except words from Dubya and Powell... and on the strength of that, they want us to waste time and lives hitting the wrong target. I am as anxious as anyone to see terrorist bodies lying in the streets... however, I would strongly prefer they be the RIGHT ONES... and not manufactured as targets of convenience. Do you suppose that would be acceptable to the war at any price crowd?

[dcwusmc]

You got some b@lls for such an anonymous newbie...

[AmishDude]

WHATEVER Saddam may have, in violation of his agreement that ended the LiveEx in '91,

. . . is already grounds for invasion by the cease fire agreement ending the first Gulf War.

unless it can be shown beyond Dubya's rhetoric

What about Powell's rhetoric? Your bar for proof seems to be moving.

that he was involved in 9/11, is irrelevant to the war on TERRORISM.

Well, we have actual checks from Saddam to families of Palestinian suicide bombers. Sounds like terrorism to me.

So far, we have nothing linking him to 9/11 except words from Dubya and Powell...

OK, so Powell isn't enough. How about Blair?

and on the strength of that, they want us to waste time and lives hitting the wrong target.

Let me grant, for the moment, that you are correct. In that case, the "right" target will be properly discouraged from acting up.

I am as anxious as anyone to see terrorist bodies lying in the streets... however, I would strongly prefer they be the RIGHT ONES...

Do you have any idea what, for example, Uday has done to Iraqi athletes? Check out ESPN.com. I won't bother linking, I've wasted too much time on this reply already. But that is pretty much terror.

Do you suppose that would be acceptable to the war at any price crowd?

Something tells me they don't care one lick about how convincing you find the evidence to be.

[AmishDude]

You got some b@lls for such an anonymous newbie...

NEWBIE? He signed up almost a year ago. Besides, a quick Find in Forum on you indicates you are more than happy to ping the AM.

[Vision]

Can someone tell me what the b/w graphic on the post to this thread is? The Indian head throws off my guesses.
Thanks

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

Heheheh. (Oh, by the way, your tagline isn't showing up on my screen.)

[AmishDude]

?

[Mr. Mojo]

Your statements are unproven, to put it kindly.

The evidence linking Saddam to 9/11 and the subsequent anthrax attacks is overwhelming, to say the least. Granted, this evidence is largely circumstantial. But circumstantial evidence is often all that is required to convict a crimminal in a U.S. court of law. If we chose to sit around with our thumbs up our asses (as you suggest) and watch Hussein distribute his WMD throughout the world, we'd be on the receiving end of it soon enough. You dudes are going to look like utter fools in a few weeks after our foray into Iraq uncovers the "iron-clad proof" that you've been desperately whining for. ....And I'll be saving this post to stick back in your faces when that time comes.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

Oh, there it is! I re-booted, and it must have fixed it.

[NYC GOP Chick]

No problem -- just sharing the scoop on these sub-cretins...

[perfect stranger]

zot 60

[gcruse]

You dudes are going to look like utter fools in a few weeks after our foray into Iraq uncovers the "iron-clad proof" that you've been desperately whining for

And if there is no proof forthcoming, you will take responsibility for the deaths?  How inadequate.