Skip to comments.
Interstate 77 closed after chemical spill in Va. [Ammonium Nitrate and blasting caps]
Greensboro Fishwrap ^
Posted on 03/06/2003 10:34:44 AM PST by AppyPappy
Interstate 77 closed after chemical spill in Va.
3-6-03
News & Record
Posted 1:35 p.m.
WYTHEVILLE, Va. (AP) -- A tractor-trailer carrying a potentially explosive liquid crashed on Interstate 77 Thursday, spilling part of its load and causing authorities to close a 20-mile stretch of the highway.
State Police 1st Sgt. David Shaver said the truck was carrying ammonium nitrate, blasting caps and boosters, which are used by quarries for blasting rock. Authorities closed all the northbound and southbound lanes of I-77 while hazardous materials crews cleaned up the spillage.
The truck was traveling from North Carolina to West Virginia when it flipped on its side around 7 a.m., blocking both northbound lanes of the interstate just north of Wytheville. The driver was treated at a local hospital and released, Shaver said. Police did not know what caused the crash.
(Excerpt) Read more at news-record.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: North Carolina; US: Virginia; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS: hazmat; wytheville
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
In the same load. Great.
1
posted on
03/06/2003 10:34:45 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
To: AppyPappy
I thought it was illegal to carry them together. Maybe that was just a military thing.
2
posted on
03/06/2003 10:37:44 AM PST
by
mbynack
To: AppyPappy
D'oh!
To: mbynack
I'm thinking "Why not fuel oil and spark plugs too?". Unbelievable.
4
posted on
03/06/2003 10:39:38 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.)
To: AppyPappy
Reminds me of the Far Side cartoon where there's a couple of guys in a rubber life raft on the high seas...They find a crate and one of the guys is peering into and says "Well, we might as well take it aboard... But I don't know what we're going to do with a bunch of broken glass, carpet tacks, and rusty old nails."
To: AppyPappy
What kind of idiot trucking company would ship this stuff in the same truck?!
6
posted on
03/06/2003 10:44:18 AM PST
by
Orangedog
(Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
To: AppyPappy
I take it these fools have never heard of Texas City.
7
posted on
03/06/2003 10:45:16 AM PST
by
Orangedog
(Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
To: All
Blasting caps and ammonim nitrate together........NICE........sounds like a scene out of the campy CHiPs series, where you'd think, "NO one would be STUPID enough to do THAT!"
Put Ponch and Jon on the case!
To: AppyPappy
Thank God that no oxygen cannisters where in the load.
To: FourtySeven
Dude, you're getting a cell
10
posted on
03/06/2003 10:47:25 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.)
To: Flurry
I bet he had his gas grill stowed in the trailer as well.
11
posted on
03/06/2003 10:48:11 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.)
To: Orangedog; All
What kind of idiot trucking company would ship this stuff in the same truck?! Guys... let's hold on a minute and review what we know.
Ammonium nitrate is a fertilizer. It is not in itself explosive. When mixed about six percent with No. 2 fuel oil, the resulting mixture is a low-yield explosive suitable for mining operations. The ammonium nitrate functions as an oxidizer, and the fuel oil functions as, well, fuel.
By itself, ammonium nitrate is no big deal.
12
posted on
03/06/2003 10:49:17 AM PST
by
Oberon
(This tagline intentionally left blank.)
To: AppyPappy
Sheesh! And that's just a few miles south of the tunnel through Big Walker Mountain...
13
posted on
03/06/2003 10:50:28 AM PST
by
Corin Stormhands
(Open war is upon you. Whether you risk it or not.)
To: Oberon
And how close would No.2 Fuel Oil be, to say, Diesel?
14
posted on
03/06/2003 10:51:21 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.)
To: Flurry
This was probably part of a convoy carrying acetylene and matches in the lead truck, hydrogen peroxide and silver in the middle truck, and this one brining up the rear...all owned by the same company!
15
posted on
03/06/2003 10:54:05 AM PST
by
Orangedog
(Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
To: AppyPappy
To: Orangedog
Sounds logical to me.
To: AppyPappy
And how close would No.2 Fuel Oil be, to say, Diesel? Diesel would make a bomb, too... No. 2 is either almost identical or totally identical to Diesel, depending on who you ask. But the stuff has to be thoroughly mixed and properly set off. The odds of that happening during a truck wreck are slim to none.
18
posted on
03/06/2003 11:20:43 AM PST
by
Oberon
(This tagline intentionally left blank.)
To: AppyPappy
The real nightmare would be if a terrorist cell managed to hijack such a load. They would be well on their way to setting up a really big boom. Not only would they have the more important half of an ANFO mix, they would have had the blasting caps to detonate, and even the truck to haul it to the target. That in itself should have been sufficient reason not to carry both in the same load.
More evidence that we still have a very, very long way to go before most people really "get it" about homeland security and start doing what has to be done.
To: AppyPappy; mbynack; Constitution Day; Orangedog; FourtySeven; Flurry; Corin Stormhands; ...
Before you all get into a frenzy about how stupid the truck driver, the dock manager and the trucking company owner must be, please read this short summary.Oberon, you are not included in that sentence.
Summary:
Program Directive A- 93 Issued August 1, 1980 Revised September 16, 1993 SUBJECT: Transporting Blasting Caps With Other Explosives AFFECTED CODES/ DIRECTIVES: OAR 437- 03- 1926.902( d), Construction 1) PURPOSE: Guidelines for evaluating compliance with 1926.902( d). (2) BACKGROUND: Questions have been received in the national OSHA office concerning the simultaneous transportation of blasting caps (including electric) with other explosives on the same vehicle, which is prohibited by 1926.902( d). This provision as been changed and is now permitted by the Department of Transportation in 49 CFR 177.835( g), which outlines the controlled conditions necessary to ensure employee safety 3) ACTION: Pending rule change, employers meeting the following requirements shall not be cited on 1926.902( d), because of the differences between present rules and new DOT regulations. Blasting caps, blasting caps with safety fuse, blasting caps with metal clad mild detonating fuse and/ or electric blasting caps may be transported in the same vehicle with other explosives, provided the following controlled conditions are complied with A. Percussion caps, detonators, blasting caps, or elec-tric blasting caps, shall be carried either in a cloth container having individual pockets for each such cap, or by at least equally safe means. D. Blasting caps, blasting caps with safety fuse, blast-ing caps with metal clad mild detonating fuse or electric blasting caps when not packed in containers referred to in (3) C., must be transported in contain-ers as prescribed in 49 CFR 178.318.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=electric+blasting+caps&btnG=Google+Search
20
posted on
03/06/2003 12:35:49 PM PST
by
B4Ranch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson