Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-war celebs talk one way, act another way
The Hamilton Spectator (Ontario, Canada) ^ | March 7, 2003 | Andrew Dreschel

Posted on 03/07/2003 4:40:21 PM PST by LurkedLongEnough

Now that we know what actors Martin Sheen and Sean Penn think about a possible war with Iraq, the burning question is what do their fellow celebrities Robert Blake and O.J. Simpson have to say about it?

Given their high-profile status as Hollywood murder suspects, surely they would bring a unique Tinseltown perspective to the great debate over America's new hard-line foreign policy.

That's certainly the case with Penn. No doubt his anti-war stance was forged and fashioned in the fires of his own violent behaviour over the years.

This is the film star, after all, who long before he went on his peace mission to Baghdad did 30 days in jail for punching out a movie extra who tried to take his picture.

And let's not forget the time Penn fired a gun at the media helicopters covering his wedding to Madonna, reportedly stalked one of Madonna's old boyfriends with a pistol, used a poster of his ex-wife for target practice, harassed her with obscene phone calls, and tied her up and slapped her around for a few hours.

I don't know about you, but I'm dying to hear any insights this guy might have about the best way to avoid conflict and hostilities between nations.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting that celebrities have no business pushing their political views in the media.

After all, former U.S. president Ronald Reagan was once a Hollywood actor and he helped bring down the Soviet Empire.

No, I believe everyone in showbiz should feel free to sermonize on the Iraq crisis, even bubbleheaded singer Sheryl Crow, whose inspired observation that the best way to solve problems is not to have enemies made me realize that the best way to become a big star is to be popular.

Sure, these people are exploiting their privileged positions as celebrities to get access to a soapbox. But that's bound to happen in an escapist culture that's elevated yesteryear's table-scrap eating jesters, jugglers and minstrels into today's pampered nouveau riche narcissists.

That said, it's important to note that the opinions of actors like Penn, Sheen, George Clooney, Alec Baldwin, Samuel L. Jackson, Woody Harrelson and others who have come out against the American government's handling of Saddam Hussein are deeply compromised.

The truth is, many of these politically conscious thespians have made millions of dollars from starring in graphically violent movies that, according to many studies, can lead to a blurring of the line between real violence and make-believe, particularly among vulnerable kids.

You don't have to be a philosopher to see there's a logical and ethical disconnect between their moralistic opposition to war and the gratuitous movie violence they condone, promote, and profit from.

Although the debate about the impact of movie violence on kids is far from over, a national U.S. study suggests that viewers who watch violence run the risk of learning violent behaviour and becoming desensitized and more fearful of being attacked.

Many anti-war actors are not only contributing to that danger, they also have a hand in the disturbing statistics cited by former U.S. president Bill Clinton that the typical child sees 200,000 dramatized acts of violence and 40,000 dramatized murders before the age of 18.

Think of Penn in Bad Boys, Clooney in From Dusk till Dawn, Harrelson in Natural Born Killers, Baldwin in The Getaway, and Jackson in Pulp Fiction. Even so-called anti-war films like Sheen's Apocalypse Now and Clooney's Three Kings are questionable, given the loving focus on blood, gore, and firepower.

The fact that many of these movies are R-rated and not supposed to be seen by kids doesn't much matter since, as a recent Darmouth medical school study suggests, a surprising number of young teens see them anyway.

Even if the hearts of these anti-war celebrities are in the right place, their actions speak louder than their limousine liberal words. And for many of them, that means churning out socially suspect hard-core action movies full of gunplay, terror and strong violence. That's a pretty shaky soapbox to preach from even by Hollywood's flimsy standards.

Andrew Dreschel's commentary appears in The Hamilton Spectator Monday, Wednesday and Friday. adreschel@thespec.com or 905-526-3495.


TOPICS: Canada; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; US: California
KEYWORDS: actors; foreignpolicy; hollywood; martinsheen; ontario; seanpenn
One Canadian's view of American foreign policy via Hollywood actors.
1 posted on 03/07/2003 4:40:21 PM PST by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Well, no one ever accused Hollywood types of being consistent....or even remotely intelligent.
2 posted on 03/07/2003 4:43:04 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
This is the film star, after all, who long before he went on his peace mission to Baghdad did 30 days in jail for punching out a movie extra who tried to take his picture.

And let's not forget the time Penn fired a gun at the media helicopters covering his wedding to Madonna, reportedly stalked one of Madonna's old boyfriends with a pistol, used a poster of his ex-wife for target practice, harassed her with obscene phone calls, and tied her up and slapped her around for a few hours.

This guy is all about peace and love.

3 posted on 03/07/2003 4:44:45 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Sean Penn is a frickin' scumbag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Yep. They're a bunch of idiots who are told that they're wonderful and smart so many times a day that they actually believe it. It's high time to knock down some of these sorry bastards down to where they belong.
4 posted on 03/07/2003 4:46:49 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
It's never been about "peace and love." It's about the hatred for a conservative President.
5 posted on 03/07/2003 4:50:44 PM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
May I add one word to your good post? A "Christian", conservative President. Nothing worse for a liberal.
6 posted on 03/07/2003 5:01:27 PM PST by maranatha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Lets talk about the two faced Hollywood crowd and their double standards.
Yes they are liberal and for the poor and little person yet for years this same crowd that live in Malibu have posted the Beeches that are state owned with No Trespassing Signs to keep ordinary people off of them because they may get to close to the stars.And they have it enforced and closed off so the public does not have access to public lands.
This is the same crowd that raises hell about SUVs and fly around in pivate jets and heat and cool 20000 sq. foot mansions that no one is occupying.
This is the same crowd that has tried to free Mumia Abu-Jamal the cold blooded murderer of an ordinary police officer but yet refuses to allow Leslie Van Houten a fair hearing and chance to be parolled after 32 years because of murdering some of their royality. Also Sirhan Sirhan is getting the same for killing a Kennedy and they really cant prove he killed Robert according to the official records but he was a Kennedy.
So you see the way liberals look at Justice,is all about who and what you are.
I dont advocate releasing Van Houten or Sirhan because I dont know the real facts but in the case of Jamal killing Officer Daniel Faulkner the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania which to my understanding is liberal says there is no doubt as to Jamals guilt and the evidence is there and they also said Jamals lawyers misrepresented the record numerous times and yet this crowd is out to free him because Faulkner was not one of them.
These people at the best are liars and at the worse they are scum unto the earth, that is the Hollywood crowd I spaek of.
7 posted on 03/07/2003 5:37:56 PM PST by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maranatha
A "Christian", conservative President. Nothing worse for a liberal.

There is one thing worse...a victorious, Iraq liberator, re-elected, increased Congressional majority, paving the way for his successor, Christian Conservative President!

8 posted on 03/07/2003 5:44:28 PM PST by NewLand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NewLand
Whoa...I can think of hundred more and we'd be here all night, I'll edit myself and just agree 100% with your spirit and heartfelt appreciation of our president.
9 posted on 03/07/2003 6:14:21 PM PST by maranatha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
They are actors. We debate with actors? We pay attention to actors when they are off the screen?
10 posted on 03/07/2003 6:17:39 PM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
It is all about Bush, not about war.
11 posted on 03/07/2003 6:19:15 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
If I could add this observation about "why do they hate us?"

Most people from other countries never get to come to our country nor we to thiers. The only images we have of each other is the media, news and movies for the most part. We see some things in foreign movies that are not of our culture but we are a tolerant sort and let it slide. Overseas they see us through the TV set and Movies produced here. Most of what they see is fiction portrayed by non-other then the Hollywood types (Martin Sheen, Sean Penn, Mike Farrell etal.).

What do they see? They see only the worst that this society offers because that is what the movie industry seems to think draws people to the theater seats. I don't know and won't judge that decision. It is thiers. We know that it is only "make believe" but folks in other countries may not understand the difference between that portrayed on the screen and the real world. Lets hope they never see "Reality Shows"!

So lets think about this:

They hate us! They hate us because they see bad things in movies! Bad things in movies are produced be Hollywood types! Hollywood types condem us our bad image! Our image is produced by Hollywood!

Funny huh!
12 posted on 03/07/2003 6:19:20 PM PST by mdcen (Pondering!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
in the disturbing statistics cited by former U.S. president Bill Clinton...should read in the statisctics cited by disturbed former president bill clinton.
13 posted on 03/07/2003 6:22:01 PM PST by RWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson