Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush approves nuclear response (If Allied forces are attacked by Chemical Weapons)!
The Washington Times ^ | January 31, 2003 | By Nicholas Kralev

Posted on 03/25/2003 1:17:01 PM PST by vannrox

Edited on 07/12/2004 4:01:59 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 next last
To: Porterville
"Bluff, we wouldn't do it unless they nuked a US city, and even then I don't buy it."

"They" eventually will, because we refuse to take necessary and prudent actions to prevent such atrocities. Whether it is Al Quaeda or some other name, eventually an American city will be vaporized. I just hope it ain't where I park my butt (L.A.).

I sincerely hope that when it happens we wake up and use all the means at our disposal to deal with radical Islam.

As I am fond of pointing out, on 9/11/2001, the enemy defined the terms of war: no innocents, no non-combatants, women and children may be attacked at will.

OK; now we understand...I hope.

--Boris

141 posted on 03/25/2003 5:57:55 PM PST by boris (Education is always painful; pain is always educational)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: nevergore
"Nuclear weapons com in al sizes just like high explosives range from an antipersonnel device to a MOAB...... "

An antipersonnel nuke? Like in the awful rendition of Starship Troopers produced by Hollywood?

--Boris

142 posted on 03/25/2003 6:02:02 PM PST by boris (Education is always painful; pain is always educational)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
"don't worry - not even GW has the balls to use any sort of Nuke in Iraq. I cannot even imagine us using them even if we were to loose a whole division to chem weapons....it's just not a box that the US is willing to open - period. This is all psy-ops and nothing more."

Let Saddam--or any Arab nation--launch WMD against Israel and see what happens.

--Boris

143 posted on 03/25/2003 6:03:38 PM PST by boris (Education is always painful; pain is always educational)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Thanks Saber.
144 posted on 03/25/2003 6:04:17 PM PST by Jen (Support our Troops * Stand up to Terrorists * Liberate Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SevenDaysInMay
Thank you. I concur.
145 posted on 03/25/2003 6:05:45 PM PST by boris (Education is always painful; pain is always educational)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

The Davy Crockett was a bazooka-type missile with a W54 nuclear warhead. It could be mounted on a Jeep, or a three-person team could carry it. The weapon system used a spin-stabilized, unguided rocket fired from a recoiless rifle. While early atomic missiles were heavy and awkward, the Davy Crockett was only 30 inches long, 11 inches wide and weighed 76 pounds.

Two types were made: a 120-mm with a range between 1,000 to 6,500 feet; and a 155-mm with a range between 1,000 to 13,000 feet. The Davy Crockett also could carry a conventional high-explosive round for use as an anti-tank weapon. Stockpiled from 1960 to 1971, the Davy Crockett brought nuclear capability to the infantry.

The W54 warhead used on the Davy Crockett weighed just 51 pounds and was the smallest and lightest fission bomb (implosion type) ever deployed by the United States, with a variable explosive yield of 0.01 kilotons (equivalent to 10 tons of TNT, or two to four times as powerful as the ammonium nitrate bomb which destroyed the Alfred P. Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995), or 0.02 kilotons-1 kiloton. A 58.6 pound variant--the B54--was used in the Special Atomic Demolition Munition (SADM), a nuclear land mine deployed in Europe, South Korea, Guam, and the United States from 1964-1989.

146 posted on 03/25/2003 6:16:28 PM PST by boris (Education is always painful; pain is always educational)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: All

Join us tonight as The Shrew interviews Robert Spencer author of "Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions About the World's Fastest Growing Religion" This should prove to be a fascinating and provocative interview about this highly timely topic. Additionally, The Shrew interviews Robert Nowacki of the Free Congress Foundation Judicial Review and we will discuss the filibuster of Miguel Estrada!

Click HERE to listen LIVE while you FReep! HIFI broadband feed HERE! (when available)

Would you like to receive a note when RadioFR is on the air? Send an email to radiofreerepublic-subscribe@radioactive.kicks-ass.net!

Click HERE to chat in the RadioFR chat room! OPEN AND CHATTING NOW!

Miss a show?

Click HERE for RadioFR Archives!

147 posted on 03/25/2003 6:17:00 PM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #148 Removed by Moderator

To: Sabertooth
More good news as I see it.
149 posted on 03/25/2003 6:37:15 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: amused
There is an excellent little movie called "Deterrence". It is low budget and the whole movie takes place in a roadside diner during a blizzard. The president, on a campaign swing thru the area is forced to take refuge during the storm. At that time, the Iraqi army masses on the Saudi border, led by Adai Hussein , Saddam's son. The entire movie takes place within the diner as the prez tries first diplomacy, then threats, to hold off the attack. He finally resorts to the nuclear option. Fascinating little film.
150 posted on 03/25/2003 6:43:36 PM PST by plusone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: The Vast Right Wing
"Let Allah Sort Them Out--"

NO, "Let Allah Sort Out Their Black Souls!"

151 posted on 03/25/2003 6:45:35 PM PST by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
bob, thought you might be able to print this out for the boys to peruse. Just post #60 and possibly the article. Thanks.

karri

152 posted on 03/25/2003 6:54:57 PM PST by gracex7 (The LORD is not slack concerning His promise....but is longsuffering to us-ward. 2 Peter 3:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
bump
153 posted on 03/25/2003 7:00:41 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Nuclear Weapon Database: United States Arsenal

Where'd that come from? FAS? Pike's outfit? Interesting information, but we could do without the snide editorial comments sprinkled throughout the text.

154 posted on 03/25/2003 7:05:15 PM PST by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
What I want to hear is an Israeli-style policy: use of WMD against Allied forces WILL result in nuclear retaliation.

Bad idea. There may be circumstances in which Saddam or the Iraqi leadership wants us to use a nuke. In such a case I see no reason why should oblige him.

155 posted on 03/25/2003 7:09:32 PM PST by supercat (TAG--you're it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
I'll see ya VX and raise ya a mushroom cloud.
156 posted on 03/25/2003 7:11:52 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #157 Removed by Moderator

To: vannrox
Nuke em Danno!
158 posted on 03/25/2003 7:32:12 PM PST by slimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Thanks for the heads up!
159 posted on 03/25/2003 8:53:30 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: boris
How does the explosive yield of the W54 compare to that of a MOAB?
160 posted on 03/25/2003 9:10:43 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson