Sterling Rome: Centcom Is Not Donahue

CNSNews.com ^ | March 27, 2003 | Sterling Rome

[jpl]

I was listening to the joint Bush-Blair press conference this morning, and some loser reporter from the BBC was still badgering them about the fact that France isn't member of the coalition. These guys just simply don't know how to "move on".

[geedee]

Sterling Rome worked for Walter Cronkite . . . hmmmmm. I guess that proves my theory about "The most trusted American." His recent liberal, anti-war rants are, in fact, the result of post-menopausal, Alzheimer dementia and not necessarily something CBS adds to their corporate water.

Of course, Dan Rather disproves my theory.

[RippleFire]

BUMP

[ELS]

bump

[AngryJawa]

"Maybe CENTCOM needs to make R Lee Ermey it's spokesperson..."

If you don't forward that idea to the Pentagon...I will. I'd pay cash money to hear R. Lee tear some a$$hat reporter a new one.

[Warrior Nurse]

PING

[OpusatFR]

Great Idea! If the names of the buffoon's making these idiotic statements gets out there with their musings posted, it might make them begin to act like journalists and not shills.

[MattAMiller]

Is Sterling Rome this guy's real name? It's real cool name.

[Sloth]

SNL sketch: Gulf War Briefing

Featuring:
Phil Hartman as the Secretary of Defense Richard Cheney
Kevin Nealon as Lt. Col. William Pierson
Also Featuring nine reporters:
Mike Myers as Reporter #1
Dana Carvey as Reporter #2
Julia Sweeney as Reporter #3
Tom Davis as Reporter #4
Jan Hooks as Reporter #5
Conan O'Brien as Reporter #6
Tim Meadows as Reporter #7
Adam Sandler as Reporter #8
Chris Farley as Reporter #9

Secretary of Defense Richard Cheney: ...and so, to sum up, while this war is by no means over, it is certainly fair to say that we have inflicted heavy damage on the Iraqi war machine, and every day brings victory for the coalition that much colser. Now I'm going to hand the floor over to the Lieutenant Colonel Pierson, who will field your questions.

Lieutenant Colonel William Pierson: Thank you Senator Cheney. I'm happy to take any questions you might have with the understanding that there are certain sensitive areas that I'm just not going to get into. Particularly, information that might be useful to the enemy. Yes?

Reporter #1: What date are we going to start the ground attack?

Pierson: Well, as I mentioned a moment ago, there are certain sensitive areas which we are just not going to go into, and that is certainly one of them. Yes?

Reporter #2: Sir, knowing what you know, where would you say our forces are most vulnerable to attack, and how could the Iraqis best exploit those weaknesses?

Pierson: Well, again, this falls into the area of information that might be useful to the enemy, and I just can't divulge it right now.

Reporter #3: Sir! Which method of hiding SCUD missiles is working best for the Iraqis?

Pierson: Now, this again is a good example of information that could help the enemy, and I just can't answer that.

Reporter #4: I have a two-part question. Are we planning an amphibious invasion of Kuwait, and if so, where exactly will that be?

Cheney: Excuse me. If I could interrupt here, I just want to underscore what Colonely Pierson said at the start of Q&A. There are two general categories of questions that we are simply not going to be able to address. On, those that would give our enemy advance warning of our actions, and two, those that would identify any points of weakness or vulnerabilities to the Iraqi forces. So let's reopen the floor to questions.

Reporter #5: I understand that there are passwords that our troops use on the front lines. Could you give us some examples of those?

Pierson: No, that is something I really cannot comment on.

Reporter #6: Yeah! Are we planning an amphibious invasion of Kuwait? And if so, where?

Pierson: I believe that question was asked and if you recall, I already answered it, or said I could not answer.

Reporter #7: Sir, what woul dbe the one piece of information that would be most dangerous for the Iraqis to know?

Pierson: No can answer! I have time for two more questions. Yeah?

Reporter #8: Yes, Farud Hashami, Baghdad Times. Where are your troops, and can I go there and count them?

Pierson: Nope! Last question.

Reporter #9: Is there anything that you can tell us that would lower the morale of our fighting men?

Pierson: No. Really, the only thing we're at liberty to say at this time is...

!!!LIVE FROM NEW YORK, IT'S SATURDAY NIGHT!!!
AIRED: FEBRUARY 9, 1991.

[livius]

all they can do is attempt to grand-stand in front of the camera like petulant teenagers

Excellent commentary by one who surely knows what he's talking about!

I have been so disgusted by these briefings that I can barely watch them. There must be some way to limit these people to the asking of questions, and prevent them from making the repellent, godawful propaganda statements they use to "preface" their so-called "questions."

The real purpose of the briefings is to disseminate the official US statement or position on the events of that day or the day before. This is to separate the facts from rumor, theory and misunderstanding. But the purpose of the briefings does not include revealing military strategy to the press in advance or defending already well known and well-publicized United States policy or strategy. Nor does it include providing a propaganda platform for a multi-national bunch of blow-dried media idiots.

[wordsofearnest]

ROFLMAO