Posted on 04/02/2003 11:04:38 PM PST by sourcery
Scientists have satisfied key tests that confirm that the virus causing the global outbreak of severe pneumonia is a new type of coronavirus. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) has so far struck down more than 2300 people, and killed 78.
The identification will speed up the testing of victims and their contacts to see how the disease spreads, and how it might be contained. That is badly needed, with new cases being announced each day in Hong Kong and China, and in previously unaffected countries, such as South Africa, the Philippines and Malaysia.
In another sign of the seriousness of the growing outbreak, the World Health Organization issued an unprecedented advisory on Wednesday, warning people not to travel to Hong Kong or the adjacent Guangdong province of China.
SARS first surfaced in Guangdong and was then carried to Hong Kong. China has claimed its epidemic was under control but on Wednesday a further 361 cases, and nine deaths, were revealed to have occurred in Guangdong in March. Also on Wednesday, WHO experts finally got the go-ahead to visit Guangdong.
On a more optimistic note, SARS outbreaks in Vietnam, Singapore and Canada, started by travellers from Hong Kong, have now been largely controlled, according to David Heymann, head of infectious diseases at the WHO.
Heymann says the virus is spread by direct contact, or large droplets of body fluids possibly deposited on surfaces. He rules out spread by tiny, aerosol droplets. "If that was the case we'd have far more cases," he told New Scientist.
Triple test
The cause of the disease has been uncertain, with two suspect viruses having been detected in patients. But on Tuesday, the WHO's Klaus Stöhr, who is coordinating the 11 labs worldwide that are collaborating on SARS, said: "We believe a coronavirus is the major causative agent".
To be definitively declared the cause of SARS, the novel virus must satisfy three conditions known as Koch's postulates. These were devised in 1890 by the German scientist Robert Koch, initially for anthrax infections.
First, the suspect microbe must be isolated from all, or nearly all, cases; second, it must be cultured in isolation; and third, those cultured germs must be able to re-create the disease in a test animal.
Albert Osterhaus of Erasmus University in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, told New Scientist that the coronavirus has now been isolated from patients in several different countries, and grown in several labs.
Now Osterhaus has cracked Koch's third, and toughest postulate. "We have infected an animal," he says. He will not yet reveal what kind, but says he has tested the virus in primates and mice. Besides showing the virus is the pathogen, says Osterhaus, the infected animals can now be used to screen antiviral drugs.
A vaccine would also be extremely valuable. Because vaccines mainly work by inducing antibodies to the pathogen, the fact that recovering SARS patients produce high levels of antibodies is encouraging. Vaccine companies have already been given virus samples, says Stöhr.
Also encouraging are reports that blood serum from convalescents, containing the antibodies, have helped to save 20 severely ill SARS victims in Hong Kong.
I don't like seeing the word anthrax attached to this story, in any way, shape or form! And no, I'm not being paranoid, just couldn't help noticing the word.
This sounds promissing. I get the feeling that unless you are coughed on or sneezed on, you should be able to avoid exposure with good handwashing habits. (the challenge being getting your children to do the same)
Another thread just posted. (To assist those that keep a list)
It's good to see confirmation that virus is not, in fact, truly airborne. I had always supected such. The high number of infected people (mostly health care workers) indicates that the virus is probably a bit more infective than a basic coronavirus, resulting in more people infected because it was not something they were used to, and thus did not take more stringent precuations. A friend of mine, who is a professor at Vanderbilt, is taking a trip to (of all places) Toronto in the near future. He firmly believes that the threat to the general population is quite low.
This is a nasty bug, to be sure, but it is controllable.
The high number of infected people (mostly health care workers)
They all were not infected at once nor in the same area. I would think after the first few deaths of patients, gloves and masks would be a priority.
COURSE, we have to take in account that China kept it hush hush far too long, and THAT makes a difference.
Yes, I agree. I'm not sure if I buy the speculation that this was a biowar bug that got loose, but I wouldn't put it past them.
Hoof and mouth disease, Legionaire's disease, Whooping Cough, and Chicken Pox, those names are cool.
But SARS?
Anyone have other suggestions?
My suggestions for the virus name:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.