[PhilDragoo]

Erika Holzer and Henry Mark Holzer co-authored AID AND COMFORT: Jane Fonda in North Vietnam, showing a treason charge would have convicted Fonda and been upheld on appeal.

On a Free Republic thread posted last night, de Genova was quoted saying "the heritage of the Holocaust is the plight of the Palestinian people."

The so-called anti-war left is sick and sickening.

It has adopted the Big Lie of Goebbels to give aid and comfort to the worst tyrants on earth.

[NavyCaptain]

The difference is these young warriors have class and discipline. They leave it to us to know how dispicable they really think these anti-americans are!

[stands2reason]

bttt

[PhilDragoo]

taking a moral stand against the uncivilized rant of people with their own ugly agendas.

An indictment of and call to arms against the de Genovas.

[Grampa Dave]

Thanks for posting this great article and the ping!

[EdReform]

Bump & Ping

[SAMWolf]

Thanks for the ping PhilDragoo.

[chainsaw]

I am still completely against this mantra that these anti-war demonstrators are against the war but support our troops. That is a moronic statement. How can you be against the war, but support them in conducting the war.

[Egregious Philbin]

Leave it to FrontPage to publish an article with junk like this:

Every one of them, when asked why they were eager to fight in Iraq, in essence gave this unhesitating reply: "First, to destroy a murderous regime before it acquires the capability to attack our country and the rest of the free world with weapons of mass destruction." [It’s called "self-defense."] "Second, to liberate the people of Iraq from decades of oppression." [It’s called "compassion."]

"in essence gave this unhesitating reply" So you're paraphrasing then? Why, then, do you feel the need to clarify the statement for us? "[It’s called "self-defense."]" I'll draw my own conclusions, thank you. [READ: at least before you start sounding out the letters.]

[RaceBannon]

We did NOT take an oath to defend the right to call on the President's Death.

We did NOT take an oath to defend their right to call on military men and women to kill their officers

We did NOT take an oath to defend their right to call on troops to rebel against their officers.

Those people who have done so are traitors, and should be tried and punished.

[jimt]

Let’s say you’re a combat infantryman, you hail from Los Angeles, and a close friend was part of that 507th convoy that went astray. Mail call. Along with the homemade cookies, your mother includes an article from the Los Angeles Times (3/25/03) by University of Southern California Law School Professor Erwin Chemerinsky, who blithely asserts that since Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld continues to violate "international law" [the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals flatly disagreed] by the Guantanamo incarceration of "war captives" [read "enemy combatants", some of them proven terrorists], "the United States cannot expect other nations [read "Iraqi Death Squads"] . . .to live by the rule of law . . . ." [Read: "You can’t blame Saddam’s thugs for executing American POWs."]

You consider the source, use it for toilet paper, and move on.