Skip to comments.
HOW THE GRANDSON OF JEWISH IMMIGRANTS BECAME AN ANGLO-SAXON, NATIVIST, XENOPHOBE...
American Patrol ^
| October 15, 1999
| Don Feder
Posted on 04/03/2003 4:38:48 PM PST by EveningStar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: EveningStar
Preposterous title.
Why would anyone call the Irish Anglo-Saxon?
They are rather proud of being Celts.
So9
2
posted on
04/03/2003 4:41:21 PM PST
by
Servant of the Nine
(We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
To: EveningStar
Bump..
3
posted on
04/03/2003 4:45:05 PM PST
by
Jhoffa_
(Frodo sleeps with men...)
To: EveningStar
Feder is interesting. He was a regular conservative columninst at the Boston Herald for years and has since taken a leave to write a book. At one time he was very much against Pat Buchanan and even nearly called him an Anti Semite. But then he seemed to have softened to Buchanan and even take some of his views and move into "Paleo" conservative land. Very odd for a devout Orthodox Jewish conservative.
4
posted on
04/03/2003 4:51:25 PM PST
by
Burkeman1
(i)
To: Burkeman1
Perhaps a " Paleo-Conservative Orthodox Jew " is one who HAS been mugged.
5
posted on
04/03/2003 5:14:50 PM PST
by
genefromjersey
(Save the last 6 for pall-bearers !)
To: genefromjersey
LOL. I read Feder for years growing up and he was very hostile to conservatives who began to question our global presence after the Cold War had ended. Then- in his last two or so years at the Herald (maybe less) he suddenly started writing columns that were against immigration, questioned our troop deployments abroad, and were not so supportive of Isreal. He changed and it was noticed by his readership.
6
posted on
04/03/2003 5:19:46 PM PST
by
Burkeman1
(i)
To: Clemenza; PARodrig; rmlew; Yehuda
ping
7
posted on
04/03/2003 5:54:39 PM PST
by
Cacique
To: genefromjersey
Not all paleos are anti-semites or isolationists.
8
posted on
04/03/2003 5:56:23 PM PST
by
rmlew
("Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute.")
To: EveningStar
interesting read.
To: Tancredo Fan; Joe Hadenuf
You might find this of interest..
10
posted on
04/03/2003 7:23:26 PM PST
by
Jhoffa_
(Frodo sleeps with men...)
To: Servant of the Nine
To: Servant of the Nine
}Why would anyone call the Irish Anglo-Saxon? They are rather proud of being Celts.
The rest of the Anglo-Saxons are also of Celtic origin. The nuances are more cultural than ethnic.
12
posted on
04/03/2003 7:52:42 PM PST
by
DensaMensa
(He who controls the definitions controls history.)
To: rmlew
You're not an anti-semite?! Who'd a thunkit! *chuckle*.
To: EveningStar
Equating today's immigrants, overwhelmingly from the Third World, with the Irish, Italians, Slavs and Jews of 100 years ago is a soothing but strained comparison. The old immigrants actually had things in common with the American majority of their day.
*It's not strained. It's true.
All of the aforementioned groups were European. Three were Christian and the fourth practice the religion from which Christianity sprang. All came from societies that respected law and had common concepts of justice, liberty and personal responsibility.
*Oh please. There were many people coming from countries other than Europe that were as christian and patriotic. Cuba, the West Indies,etc. Give me a break. This author has a short term, or he likes to leave out facts. No Jews, No Dogs, No Niggers signs... No Irish Need Apply... WOPs and all that.
Equally important, there was no bilingual education, no bilingual ballots, no dumbed-down citizenship tests, no quotas, no multiculturalism, no militant racial interest groups, no chip-on-the-shoulder minorities clamoring for what they perceive to be due.
*There were militant racial interests. It was called the KLAN and very much active. There was blatant RACISM in this country at the beginning of the twentieth century. If there wasn't that racism to begin with, we wouldn't have a lot of the reverse madness we have today.
14
posted on
04/03/2003 8:15:36 PM PST
by
cyborg
To: EveningStar
The Dems, if they were honest, would admit to favoring mass immigration in order to destroy "Amerika."
The Pubbies favor it for....Don't really know why, but they favor it.
We're lost.
15
posted on
04/03/2003 8:25:43 PM PST
by
ricpic
To: ricpic
What the left is doing is ignoring the very Malthusian numbers posted by the "new" (post 1965) immigrants. The Mexicans alone, in one year, can easily top the number of Eastern European Jewish Immigrants who came over a period of 50 years.
The numbers tell the tale. In 100 years, between 1850 and 1950, some 4 million Irish came here. Some 6 Million Italians. Some 3 Million Poles. Perhaps 4 million Jews. Maybe 10 Million of everyone else, among whom were a lot of British.
Suppose some 50 Million in total came during that 100-year period. The Latinos have topped that number in just 40 years. They now outnumber African-Americans, and certainly every other distinct ethnic group.
Folks, this ain't a "Melting Pot," it's one big bowl of chili, in which ethnic groups other than hispanic hopefully can still just add a bit of flavor.
To: EveningStar
bttt
17
posted on
04/03/2003 9:05:39 PM PST
by
spodefly
(This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
To: cyborg
There were militant racial interests. It was called the KLAN and very much active. There was blatant RACISM in this country at the beginning of the twentieth century. If there wasn't that racism to begin with, we wouldn't have a lot of the reverse madness we have today. Really?
To: All
To: EveningStar
Of the first 6,000 rioters arrested in Los Angeles in 1992, when South Central exploded after the first Rodney King verdict, roughly one-third were illegals.That was a good year. When the police ran off, and the Korean citizens broke out their arms and stood their ground...That's what the second amendment is all about...They are a well armed community without a doubt.
Oh, and the only reason all those illegal aliens were arrested, was because they are all hard working, good family people that are doing jobs others wont.....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson