[Servant of the Nine]

Preposterous title.

Why would anyone call the Irish Anglo-Saxon?

They are rather proud of being Celts.

So9

[Jhoffa_]

Bump..

[Burkeman1]

Feder is interesting. He was a regular conservative columninst at the Boston Herald for years and has since taken a leave to write a book. At one time he was very much against Pat Buchanan and even nearly called him an Anti Semite. But then he seemed to have softened to Buchanan and even take some of his views and move into "Paleo" conservative land. Very odd for a devout Orthodox Jewish conservative.

[Cacique]

ping

[demosthenes the elder]

interesting read.

[cyborg]

Equating today's immigrants, overwhelmingly from the Third World, with the Irish, Italians, Slavs and Jews of 100 years ago is a soothing but strained comparison. The old immigrants actually had things in common with the American majority of their day.

*It's not strained. It's true.

All of the aforementioned groups were European. Three were Christian and the fourth practice the religion from which Christianity sprang. All came from societies that respected law and had common concepts of justice, liberty and personal responsibility.

*Oh please. There were many people coming from countries other than Europe that were as christian and patriotic. Cuba, the West Indies,etc. Give me a break. This author has a short term, or he likes to leave out facts. No Jews, No Dogs, No Niggers signs... No Irish Need Apply... WOPs and all that.


Equally important, there was no bilingual education, no bilingual ballots, no dumbed-down citizenship tests, no quotas, no multiculturalism, no militant racial interest groups, no chip-on-the-shoulder minorities clamoring for what they perceive to be due.

*There were militant racial interests. It was called the KLAN and very much active. There was blatant RACISM in this country at the beginning of the twentieth century. If there wasn't that racism to begin with, we wouldn't have a lot of the reverse madness we have today.

[ricpic]

The Dems, if they were honest, would admit to favoring mass immigration in order to destroy "Amerika."

The Pubbies favor it for....Don't really know why, but they favor it.

We're lost.

[spodefly]

bttt

[EveningStar]

Another search revealed an even earlier posting of this article.

Interesting that in all its postings it hasn't garnered more replies.

[Joe Hadenuf]

Of the first 6,000 rioters arrested in Los Angeles in 1992, when South Central exploded after the first Rodney King verdict, roughly one-third were illegals.

That was a good year. When the police ran off, and the Korean citizens broke out their arms and stood their ground...That's what the second amendment is all about...They are a well armed community without a doubt.

Oh, and the only reason all those illegal aliens were arrested, was because they are all hard working, good family people that are doing jobs others wont.....

[fishtank]

I thought this article was going to be about Michael Savage.

[skeeter]

bttt

[Countyline]

... I largely agree with the writer of this article. ...unrestrained immigration will overrun all our existing systems.. A system of absorption is needed to slow it down for accommodation of everyone involved.

Limits on the numbers allowed totally, divided up among the nations. What has happened to California will worsen and spread. Are we stupid or what? Over loaded systems collapse.

There is no place for all this money to come from except our pockets; and then we all get to live at near poverty.

[EveningStar]

Don Feder delivered this speech 17 years ago. How relevant is it now?