Skip to comments.
'Saddam' in speach read without glasses!?
Posted on 04/04/2003 12:00:41 PM PST by Dominic Harr
Forgive the vanity, but I really think this might be important.
The fella in today's speach, didn't he read the entire thing without glasses?
He's clearly reading, for long pages at a time.
Anyone know if Saddam could pull that off?
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: decapitation; iraqifreedom; saddamdeathwatch; topplesaddam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: Dominic Harr
Lasik.
2
posted on
04/04/2003 12:01:38 PM PST
by
TADSLOS
(Sua Sponte)
To: Dominic Harr
Finally found that bottle of contact lens cleaner.
3
posted on
04/04/2003 12:02:08 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: trini
ping.
4
posted on
04/04/2003 12:02:20 PM PST
by
RMDupree
(HHD: Pray for our President, our troops and the innocent civilians!)
To: Dominic Harr
> The fella in today's speach, didn't he read the
> entire thing without glasses?
> Anyone know if Saddam could pull that off?
Didn't see it, but...
The "glasses" speech was the exception. SH reportely
normally wears contacts and reads from a teleprompter.
I suspect the war will be over before we get convincing
determinations on who was in these appearances, and when
they were made.
5
posted on
04/04/2003 12:04:54 PM PST
by
Boundless
To: Dominic Harr

"Found in the bunker."
6
posted on
04/04/2003 12:05:01 PM PST
by
Cagey
To: Dominic Harr
"Large print"
7
posted on
04/04/2003 12:06:13 PM PST
by
_Jim
( // NASA has a better safety record than NASCAR \\)
To: Dominic Harr
That was Mini Me not Saddam...
8
posted on
04/04/2003 12:07:36 PM PST
by
Pharmboy
(Dems lie 'cause they have to)
To: Boundless
I already don't care if it was him or not. Not really the point of this war activity.
9
posted on
04/04/2003 12:07:51 PM PST
by
sarasota
To: Dominic Harr
Maybe he just realized how he looked in them...
To: Dominic Harr
He could have contacts...which makes you wonder why he didn't use them in the earlier tape.
The print he's reading from could be giant sized...I didn't notice how big the pages were or how many times he flipped the pages.
We just don't know do we, if this was Saddam, or if this was old and highly edited old video... Mainly because we don't know if the words he spoke matched up to the words of the translator. I hope the CIA has an Iraqi lip reader.
and by the way.
What's the big deal of him being on television if the electricity in Baghdad is out? I mean, his appearance wouldn't "inspire" the people of Baghdad to fight if they couldn't see it.
11
posted on
04/04/2003 12:09:39 PM PST
by
YaYa123
To: YaYa123
Plus, he hasn't exactly been giving the Gettysburg address. Anyone could get in front of a camera and spout off that blather. He repeats some of the same lines and it sounds just like the same old drivel he would give in a speech before the war.
To: All
I had thought I heard someone, somewhere, say his eyesight was of the sort that he didn't have contacts for reading.
But I'm clueless about glasses, contacts, etc.
To: Dominic Harr
Could he have had an earpiece in his ear, like the newspeople use, and position the camera so that it doesn't show?
To: Dominic Harr
"Large print"
Before the variable fonts of today there were special speech typewriters equipped with BIG FONTS ...
15
posted on
04/04/2003 12:18:08 PM PST
by
_Jim
( // NASA has a better safety record than NASCAR \\)
To: Dominic Harr
Severe concussions have been known to correct various nuerological maladies, including poor vision.
16
posted on
04/04/2003 12:21:07 PM PST
by
skeeter
(Fac ut vivas)
To: Paul Atreides; _Jim
Well, he is clearly reading, tho, I think.
CNN's HomePage has a link to it.
And it's one of those notebooks with brads at the top, certainly not printed by a machine. Maybe he wrote real, real big, but I don't know . . .
Certainly, in the long run, it doesn't matter.
He's dead one way or another.
To: skeeter
Wouldn't that be funny?
Interesting point.
To: Dominic Harr
He's dead one way or another.
"We can kill you know, or we can kill you later."
(proposed statement for the United States Marine Corps to make to Saddam...)
19
posted on
04/04/2003 12:29:35 PM PST
by
VOA
To: Dominic Harr
How quickly did he go though each page? If the speech was printed in large type, he'd flip though them faster than if in small type.
20
posted on
04/04/2003 12:32:59 PM PST
by
RonF
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson