[Beck_isright]

This is why I find strong disagreement with Stratfor lately. The models used in their arguements are over 50 years old. We will use a modern model using more non-lethal civilian friendly weapons as we can. I can see a low loss rate but God forbid we don't dreg up the worse case scenarios so they can get more subscribers. The only way I can see high casualties is if the Iraqi military unleashes biologicals on their own population.

V

[Rockitz]

As a friend of mine commented, maybe a Belfast model is more recent, but certainly no more appetizing.

[finnman69]

Making 60 year old comparisons to 21st modern warfare is ludicrous. Even Vietnam era comparisons do not fly.