Commuters Sound Off on Traffic-Blocking Rallies [Free Repu

FoxNews.com ^ | April 6, 2003 | Liza Porteus

[Joe Bonforte]

NEW YORK

[Joe Bonforte]

Protesters say they don't have much choice.

"Nothing else gets attention," protestor Johannah Westmacott told the Associated Press. "It's not news when people voice their opinions."

Do you suppose that's because THEY DON'T AGREE WITH YOU, YOU IMBECILES!

[Joe Bonforte]

Whoops, the title got cut off. Notice the mention of the Free Republic Network.

[friendly]

Let's see... Taxpayers who commute and work are delayed and harassed by non-functional traitors, half of whom are on phony disablity. Do you think the commuters would take a dim view of these democrats?

[Gorzaloon]

Lynch said many groups encourage activists to stay within the bounds of the law, because "there is a point to be made where you don't want to alienate your allies." But "there are situations as to where civil disobedience is called for."

I agree. Other types of disobediance involves baseball bats and tear gas and brake failures, of which I also approve in these situations.

Demonstrate all you want. Get petitions, buy billboards for all I care. But economically sabotaging the "Ignorant unenlightened worker bees" (Who pay for these idle masturbators' Public Defenders and "Room And Board") deserves intervention by the Public.

[mylife]

Scott Lynch, communications director for Peace Action. "The point of view of people obstructing traffic … is that it's not OK and you shouldn't just be a happy little worker bee and a consumer going about your business

Hey Scott....Consume This!!

[Keith]

Shhh...quiet...leave them be...they are DEMOCRATS...they are doing the "battlefield shaping" for our coming landslide.

[Alberta's Child]

Nobody has a right to force me as a motorist to become part of their protest by blocking the road on which I am driving. I don't care what the subject of a demonstration is, even if I agree with the demonstrators -- Anyone who blocks traffic should be run over by at least one vehicle just for being a pain in the @ss.

[skinkinthegrass]

Short & Sweet, DITTOs... :)

[Chancellor Palpatine]

.

[grammymoon]

I'm with you on this and then we need to back up over them.

[Interesting Times]

FR Network ping.

[McGavin999]

The only thing that's going to stop these things is for the people to just keep driving. The first car should just inch forward until the protestor moves and then everyone can just keep going.

Another thing that would help is to take a bag of ripe garbage with you. If enough people started throwing garbage on these folks maybe they'd get the message.

[Interesting Times]

That's a point I didn't get to when I was on Fox & Friends the other day -- that the belligerent tactics of the leftists aren't winning the hearts and minds of the citizenry. A recent Fox News poll said that 63% of the public views the anti-war protestors unfavorably. Also, when a peace riot appears on the TV, huge numbers of viewers reach for the remote. As the leftists become increasingly frustrated at their own ineffectiveness and lack of support, expect more violence and more extremist tactics, which in turn will further marginalize them in the eyes of reasonable people.

[MinuteGal]

Too bad they always quote people who are upset because of traffic delays.

Surely there's some people to quote who are upset about the traffic delays PLUS who are upset at the scumbag disruptors and their anti-war agenda.

But one can not have everything. I'm grateful for the Free Republic mention.

Leni

[RonDog]

"We're starting to see quite a bit of it on the streets," Scott Swett, chairman of the Free Republic Network, told Fox News. "People are interested in taking a stand and having their voices heard..."

Yeah, yeah, yeah. That's good, too...

...but he also called the "anti-war" protests "Peace RIOTS!"

THAT was a classic, Scott!!!

See also:

FRN Chairman to appear on Fox and Friends
Free Republic Network ^ | April 1, 2003 | Free Republic Netwok
Posted on 04/01/2003 8:02 PM PST by The Shrew

FREE REPUBLIC NETWORK

The Free Republic Network is pleased to announce that its chairman, Scott Swett, is scheduled to appear on the Fox News Network's Morning show - Fox and Friends at approximately 8:00 EST, Wednesday, April 2, 2003 to discuss the Rally for America and the Network's support of our troops fighting terrorism throughout the world and in support of our troops in the war in Iraq.

Scott will be representing Freepers far and wide in this rare network media opportunity to talk about our support of the US Military, President Bush and our desire to see a free Iraqi people.

In a six to eight minute segment Scott will be highlighting the recent nationwide rallies. Over the course of the month of March in over 100 cities over 150,000 people attended rallies in support of our troops...

CLICK HERE for the rest of the thread

[Interesting Times]

...but he also called the "anti-war" protests "Peace RIOTS!"

It would be nice to see that phrase get some mileage. It's a pretty effective two-word dismissal of the peace thugs.

Say, there's another one.

[Interesting Times]

Too bad they always quote people who are upset because of traffic delays.

Surely there's some people to quote who are upset about the traffic delays PLUS who are upset at the scumbag disruptors and their anti-war agenda.

Yeah, I'd like to see a nice quote from a military wife saying that the leftists, by giving support and hope to Saddam's regime, are increasing the chances that the husband she loves won't come home. And they call this "supporting the troops."

[Bob J]

Cool!

[DrGill]

Criminals who put anyone in danger, threaten or destroy property are simply criminals. That's simple.

Let's all step back for just a moment and remember that even though we can vehemently disagree with each other, I suspect every last one of us would stand side by side if our rights to free speech were ever threatened. Voices of dissent, protests, rallys, and the blood spilled on our soil through the history of this country's formation all served to sustain and hold sacred this right that we still fiercely protect today.

That being said, I have seen handfuls of poorly behaving extrememists within all public demonstrations, both pro and con. This is simply a statistical cross section of all society - there were likely a few boneheads who embarrassed just about every group who stood for something since the beginning of time!! Of course the few bad apples get the spotlight and any opposing cause can gleefully tout them as a sophomoric, uninformed, ill behaved example of all to try and discredit the actual multitudes demonstrating for an ideology to which they don't ascribe. Truly informed, mature citizens who stand together for any cause all know this is a silly tactic and does nothing to further useful debate. The majority of citizens who are taking time out of their lives, jobs, families etc. to gather and have their voices heard I respect wholeheartedly! There simply wouldn't BE such a passionate clash of views right now if there were not very good and reasonable facts to support each perspective.
As early as last September, the murmurings of war began to seep into our thoughts. This began small debates among coworkers, neighbors, families etc. We all were and hopefully still are trying to find our opinions, hearts and minds making choices with as much information as possible. As murmurings grew into international media statements and less subtle political posturing, we all began to realize this issue's potential for a diplomatic resolution was diminishing daily. Actual war, worldwide political upheaval, and long time international friends and allies began to turn away from us. Fear and uncertaintly grew. Some of us looked inside and found a deep desire to follow our government's course of action, and some of us looked and found a deep need to voice diagreement.
Many chose to let the White House know it had an exponentially growing populace who really didn't agree and why via letters to Congress, Senate, President, Vice President etc. Media sources were contacted. This was done in droves, the volumes of letters, phone calls and requests for at least public debates went surprisingly ignored. So, the volume of communications grew to staggering numbers, and ignored by still both White House and media. This is still last fall mind you. Thousands grew into tens of thousands, until the silence of requests in such overwhelming numbers for acknowledgement alone became deafening. Pleas to media for at least a mention continued to no avail. Others around me were aghast. I held to my lifelong faith that the government I knew would of course address our concerns in time - we just needed to step up the numbers a bit. Why on earth would US elected officials not want to acknowledge a huge surge of public opinion banging on their door?
In December, my city alone had weekly gatherings of hundreds, then thousands of people with candles and signs. Towns and cities nearby had burgeoning masses doing the same thing, larger and larger week after week - and still, not a single whisper of our existence or opinion could be found reported anywhere. Letter campaigns grew and grew, numbers of people grew and grew, calls every hour on the hour - we joked about sending candygrams and singing gorillas to lighten our growing disbelief, but really, what else could thousands of people do? The White House and press promised shock and awe - and they delivered, but it hit much earlier to those of us who used to believe we all had a right to be heard in this country.
When the press finally began to cover the protests, it was when the masses of people had grown so shocked and frustrated, some began doing things like stopping traffic and disrupting businesses. That at least finally got press attention after months of begging them to cover the thousands of marches all over the country for so many months. Lesson here I suppose is: you can rally, hold candle vigils, converge gently by the thousands without being disruptive for months with zero press. How lucky, first time peace rallys got noted was when a few of the groups did something negative!! For those acts, the multitudes of the rest of us who'd been "invisible" nationwide for months now got to be labeled as a small handful of fringe element lawless freaks. Not fair, not the reality, oh well.
Your fellow Americans who have the integrity to question current policy exist in far larger numbers than we'll ever see admitted on CNN, are not represented in the poll results that mainstream media airs, may have some members with hair longer than yours, and some might even be out of work right now (I'm sure none of the folks who hold an opposite view would NEVER allow an out of work person to be associated with their ranks). Many of us have vastly different reasons for opposing the war, I challenge anyone to find a war protestor who does not detest Hussein and want him gone for good(goal vs method is a common debate), the majority are doctors, teachers, farmers, hairdressers, local mayors, housewives, CEO's, and yes, even some fringe types who do some dumb things for whatever reason. We began as fast growing group of people who had a desire to express our concerns to our fellow Americans and our government,hoping for some debate and dialog. Sadly, many have reluctantly become disillusioned and angry. The war is on, we have learned first hand that US public outcry can be ignored quite conveniently.
One last thing, pro war folks have my respect for standing for their beliefs overall. Argue your stance with information, intelligence and maturity. That's what we could all use a bit more of these days. For those who are incapable of that, you may want to realize that ranting only about appearance and theoretical job status of others does nothing to support your view, hints at a suspicious lack of knowledge, and suggests you might be incapable of conveying cogent thoughts. Translation: that would be the same "stuff" many of us imbecile protestors are accused of, so be careful.