Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gilligan casts doubt on source of hotel attack [Iraq Responsible For Hotel Kill Shot]
The Guardian ^ | 4-8-03 | Ciar Byrne

Posted on 04/09/2003 10:20:16 AM PDT by Prince Charles

Gilligan casts doubt on source of hotel attack

Ciar Byrne

Tuesday April 8, 2003

Palestine Hotel: two journalists died after today's attack

The BBC's defence correspondent Andrew Gilligan has cast doubt on whether the missile that killed two journalists in Baghdad today was fired by a US tank, speculating that Iraqi soldiers may have launched the lethal attack.

The US military has admitted one of its tanks fired on the Palestine Hotel, the centre for most of the foreign media in the Iraqi capital.

However, Gilligan said reports from central command in Qatar were starting to suggest US tank fire was not responsible for the deaths of Reuters cameraman Taras Protsyuk and Jose Couso, a cameraman with the Spanish TV network Telecinco.

Three other Reuters journalists and an Abu Dhabi TV staff member were injured when an explosion hit their room on the 15th floor of the hotel.

"I may be right in saying we're hearing from central command that they're starting to retract their apology for this incident," Gilligan told Radio 5 Live's drivetime show.

He added that after examining the scene he concluded it was virtually impossible for the US tank to have fired on the 15th floor room.

"I have to say I rather doubt it and, having been underneath it and looking up now just before it got dark at the hole again in the side of the hotel, I still doubt it.

"For a start the damage to the hotel is superficial, it's only the masonry that's been torn off in a very small area, a tank shell would have done more damage I feel.

"Secondly the angle that the tank would have to have reached to hit that roof, it would more or less have had to have shot just round the corner and I don't think even the Americans have got those kinds of weapons."

Gilligan said although American tank fire hit other parts of the hotel, it was possible an Iraqi attack was responsible for the journalists' deaths.

"Now the Americans have admitted they fired at the hotel. There was damage to other parts of the hotel.

"This was the main one the 15th floor room, where the two people were killed and three injured, but there was also damage to rooms on the 14th and 17th floors.

"Now that might have been the responsibility of the Americans.

"This might have been the responsibility of someone else, maybe some Saddam Fedayeen with a rocket-propelled grenade, who did not like the fact the Reuters guy was shooting footage from his balcony at the time of the attack.

"That is pure speculation. I just think there must still be some doubt over this area."

Earlier today the US army said it had fired at the hotel after coming under sniper attack.

It said the deaths were "unfortunate". General Buford Blount, the commander of the 3rd Infantry division, which is at the vanguard of the advance on Baghdad, said a tank was "receiving small arms fire and RPG fire from the hotel".

Later the US army said although journalists were on a "protected list" the military was "correct in returning fire" because of the real threat to their troops.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 04/09/2003 10:20:16 AM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Yeah, but what does the Skipper say?
2 posted on 04/09/2003 10:21:30 AM PDT by Adam-ondi-Ahman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
interesting... thanks for the post
3 posted on 04/09/2003 10:21:50 AM PDT by swaimh (Venimus, vidimus, vicimus: we came, we saw, we conquered [saddam, that is])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Gilligan?


4 posted on 04/09/2003 10:22:05 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
Hey little buddy!
5 posted on 04/09/2003 10:22:43 AM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

Donating to the FreeRepublic will keep the bright beacon
of Freedom shining so that our Troops
and the world will know we stand with them.


Please join us.

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

6 posted on 04/09/2003 10:25:01 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Maybe he's trying to make up for an earlier screw-up.

Apparently he was on BBC last weekend reporting that he was at the airport and there were no American troops, while at the same time there were live pictures of Americans at that same airport. I guess he grew too enamored with his minders, and let them write his stories for him.

7 posted on 04/09/2003 10:25:33 AM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adam-ondi-Ahman; Prince Charles
I'd rather know what Ginger thinks.


8 posted on 04/09/2003 10:29:15 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
The universe revolves around the collective journalistic rectum. They are the center, the emphasis, the second comming. They are the air we breath the food we eat. Journalists are the prime mover, the cats meow and the cats pajamas. They walk on water and talk on air and can do no wrong.

Amazing that they have not figured out that war zones are dangerous.

9 posted on 04/09/2003 10:29:49 AM PDT by Blue Screen of Death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles


What does Mary Ann say? She's the one that I always believed!!!

Stay Strong
Fuzzy

10 posted on 04/09/2003 10:29:58 AM PDT by fuzzy122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
maybe some Saddam Fedayeen with a rocket-propelled grenade, who did not like the fact the Reuters guy was shooting footage from his balcony at the time of the attack.

"Another 'shocking' example of Friendly Fire". ("back to you, Peter")

11 posted on 04/09/2003 10:30:01 AM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Does anyone else remember Baghdad Bob last week muttering "embedded beware"? or something like that? When he said it, it sounded like he was threatening the press.
12 posted on 04/09/2003 10:31:01 AM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
This looks like some of the unpleasnt non-military surprises the Iraqi's promiced.
13 posted on 04/09/2003 10:31:17 AM PDT by oyez (I'm an old fool, but..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Maybe the Americans were under attack by a sniper who used a silencer.
14 posted on 04/09/2003 10:32:42 AM PDT by syriacus (Arnett had the word SUCKER pasted on his big forehead ... and the Iraqis knew how to use him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
He was quoted as saying "sorry Skipper".
15 posted on 04/09/2003 10:34:36 AM PDT by MP5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Is this the same guy that scolded the BBC for their *wrong* reporting on the war?

If so, I admire him very much.

16 posted on 04/09/2003 10:56:08 AM PDT by dixiechick2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
With Gilligan, the Fisker too, Pete Arnett (Saddam's wife),
Pilger, Lindsey and the Talking Heads, here on the BBC's isle...
17 posted on 04/09/2003 11:01:09 AM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
An analysis worthy of the Professor!
18 posted on 04/09/2003 11:04:17 AM PDT by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
I could sure use some Ginger about now.
19 posted on 04/09/2003 11:07:21 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb the hell out of saddam. Bomb saddam to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
I find Mary Ann to be much more attractive.
20 posted on 04/09/2003 11:10:40 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson