Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where Did All the Soldiers Go?
STRATFOR ^ | Apr 09, 2003

Posted on 04/09/2003 5:33:58 PM PDT by Axion

Where Did All the Soldiers Go?
Apr 09, 2003 - 2300 GMT

Summary

Baghdad supposedly was packed with members of the Special Republican Guard and Fedayeen, as well as remnants of Republican Guard units from the south and regular army reinforcements from the north. They largely turned up missing when U.S. troops arrived. The question is: Did U.S. troops meet the rear guard, or the last remnants of a shattered regime in Baghdad?

Analysis

An Al Jazeera reporter told CNN on April 9 "we never saw" members of the Special Republican Guard, Republican Guard or Fedayeen in Baghdad. He said reporters in the city heard explosions where they assumed the Iraqi defenders must have been, and noted that the coalition played up their role a lot, but said he and his colleagues never saw anything to indicate that there was a substantial ground force defending Baghdad.

A critical question remains in Iraq. Where did the Iraqi military go? In particular, where did Iraq's elite units go?

U.S. forces that advanced on Baghdad were slowed by resistance from small units, but never met large Iraqi troop concentrations in battle. In the north and south, U.S. troops frequently arrived on the battlefield to find Iraqi positions abandoned, with weapons and uniforms left behind. They found command and control facilities that apparently had been evacuated before the war began.

Though U.S. troops found destroyed armor following the bombardment of supposed Iraqi troop concentrations, there have been no reports of large numbers of dead Iraqi soldiers. Iraqi casualties have been in line with small unit engagements. Moreover, very few Iraqi soldiers have been taken prisoner. The total number of Iraqi prisoners reportedly in coalition custody has remained at between 6,000 and 8,000 since the first days of the war. Reports of individual skirmishes indicated that only a handful of prisoners were taken in each case.

Soldiers do not simply vanish. Iraq, like the former Soviet Union and China, intentionally assigned soldiers to units away from their homes. This reduced the chances for units to develop local sympathies in opposition to the regime, and reduced barriers to employing units to suppress civil unrest. If soldiers simply abandoned their positions and went home, as some have speculated, there would be columns of thousands of men wandering from one end of Iraq to another. Alternatively, there would be rampant looting across the country as soldiers sought food, treasure, and transportation on their way home.

More significantly, the elite units closest to the regime and thus with the most to lose from its collapse apparently have vanished without a fight. They even apparently abandoned Baghdad, where the dense urban setting would have allowed them to inflict heavy casualties on coalition forces -- heavy enough perhaps to cause Washington to accept a negotiated settlement. These were not incompetent soldiers, according to sources familiar with their training, and there was no reason to believe their position was hopeless. U.S. bombing of Baghdad focused on well-known government targets, and Iraqi defenders easily could have avoided destruction in residential areas.

So where did everyone go? A routed military would have left more bodies on the battlefield, both alive and dead.

One guess is the Iraqi military systematically abandoned the fight before it began. This would be in line with pre-war claims that negotiations were under way to secure the surrender of entire Iraqi divisions. The only ones willing to fight were a few hundred hardcore supporters of the regime and foreign volunteers.

A more convoluted interpretation was offered by Russian sources, who said that the Iraqi military not only intentionally withdrew from the battlefield, but they did so as part of a secret deal. The deal, allegedly negotiated by former Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov before the war, involved Saddam Hussein and Washington agreeing to a "show war" that would give the United States a quick and relatively painless victory in return for sparing the Republican Guard and the lives of the exiled Iraqi leadership. This appears to be a fanciful interpretation spun in hindsight around events.

Both of these interpretations would bode well for coalition forces. But a third possibility remains. Iraqi forces continue to control the mountainous region around Mosul and Kirkuk. It is possible that many of the forces believed to be in the south are actually entrenched in a redoubt in the north, and those left behind served only as a rear guard to delay U.S. advances and give the impression of a larger army.

We have found no solid evidence to support this possibility. We have no evidence to refute it. But until U.S. forces are in place to probe Iraqi defenses in the north, it may yet be premature to declare victory over the Iraqi military.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fallofbaghdad; iraqifreedom; republicanguard; victory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 04/09/2003 5:33:58 PM PDT by Axion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Axion
Let the 4th ID solve this problem.
2 posted on 04/09/2003 5:37:01 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
We Replaced Patrick Leahy's Brains With Folger's Crystals. Let's See If Anyone Notices!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 04/09/2003 5:37:21 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Axion
Well, for starters, last night someone estimated about 95,000 dead Iraqi soldiers.
4 posted on 04/09/2003 5:37:51 PM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau
well sure, the 4th can solve it, but the issue is: where are they? sure, alot of them have been killed. but the special republican guard doesn't seem to have made an appearance, did they? I don't know.
5 posted on 04/09/2003 5:39:55 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Axion
It is possible that many of the forces believed to be in the south are actually entrenched in a redoubt in the north, and those left behind served only as a rear guard to delay U.S. advances and give the impression of a larger army.

This makes no sense. To what end would the bulk of the Iraqi army attempt to fight the U.S. in terrain more suitable for the U.S.? Also, if there is a huge northern Iraq army, how is it to be re-supplied?

6 posted on 04/09/2003 5:41:00 PM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Axion
The Republican Guard? Gone to graveyards, everyone.
7 posted on 04/09/2003 5:41:43 PM PDT by Cagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Most of them are dead...I've heard estimates close to 100,000
8 posted on 04/09/2003 5:42:51 PM PDT by mystery-ak (Saddam...your time is almost up..my hubby and son are on their way to kick your a$$ out of Baghdad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Axion
But until U.S. forces are in place to probe Iraqi defenses in the north, it may yet be premature to declare victory over the Iraqi military.

If the Republican Guard pulled back, I would not expect them to be able to stand against us in the North, either.

Just to be safe, we should use the Ivy Division and a MOAB or two.

9 posted on 04/09/2003 5:46:19 PM PDT by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Axion
Well only a fraction of the 80,000 or so bombs we have dropped so far in this war were in Baghdad. Many people have the impression that what they see on the Baghdad cams is the extent of our fighting. During these past 21 nights, our military has been pounding away at Iraqi troops away from the big cities. They have likely been pulverized. The death toll is probably well in excess of 100,000. Of course, the United States is not going to "brag" of killing that many people - even if they were the soldiers of an evil regime. It's just not something you announce to the world.
10 posted on 04/09/2003 5:46:44 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (California wine beats French wine in blind taste tests. Boycott French wine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Axion
Special Republican Guard. Does this mean they ride the short bus?
12 posted on 04/09/2003 5:48:45 PM PDT by rabidralph (Hey, Saddumb, All Your Base Are Belong To Us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walkingman
You worry too much. You should check under your bed. There could be a nuclear device under there.
13 posted on 04/09/2003 5:51:39 PM PDT by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Axion
Most obvious answer: we've killed most of them and the rest quit as soon as they thought they could escape Saddam's grasp. Remember, fear is what kept most of these soldiers in line. Remove the fear of Saddam, and you remove his power. Apparently, we finally hit the turning point yesterday when word had spread widely enough among the Iraqis that Saddam was finished.

I do have lingering concerns about two things:
1) Underground facilities - these are vast and could provide significant tactical advantages to what remains of Saddam's military.
2) Chemical warfare - consider this scenario: Saddam's loyal forces withdraw from Baghdad, either underground or to the North. What remains in the city is only coalition forces and disloyal Iraqis in the midst of celebration. Launch heavy nerve and blister agent attack killing everyone remaining in the city. After the gas dissipates (wouldn't take long in the heat), move back in and regain control of the city, while blaming the chemical weapon use on the Americans.

The U.S. military is prepared for such dirty tricks, and we would prevail in the end, but that doesn't mean a large number of Iraqis wouldn't die in the process - the very ones we are trying to free. I hope this remains nothing more than a scenario. In the meantime, I celebrate the Iraqis' new-found freedom.
14 posted on 04/09/2003 5:52:33 PM PDT by norcalvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Axion
The professional soldiers just plain quit the field. They are now civilians. The terrorist-based forces were dealt with by the 3rd infantry in very short order. Game Over!


15 posted on 04/09/2003 5:53:26 PM PDT by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Axion
Better questions? Where did Sadamn go? Where did the sons go? Where did Tariq Aziz go? Where did the Info Minister go? Why is the Iraqi in New York (UN rep) not being arrested as a war criminal?

The ELITE Republican guard troops were just brainwashed pawns of the regime. The above mentioned people were the regime.

All to often we are agreeable to 'just move on'. It is time to hold people accountable for their actions.

Also, the people who were against removing this regime, including the Pope, need to admit to the world that they were wrong............

16 posted on 04/09/2003 5:53:39 PM PDT by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
"The Republican Guard? Gone to graveyards, everyone."

Oh, when will they ever learn?

17 posted on 04/09/2003 5:53:51 PM PDT by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Axion
STRATFOR = DEBKA = MISINFORMATION
18 posted on 04/09/2003 5:54:51 PM PDT by Mister Magoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
Most of them are dead...I've heard estimates close to 100,000

Isn't that 5,000 a day and where are the injured. What is the rato of wounded to dead in battle...2 to1, 3 to 1, 4 to 1, 5 t0 1 ?

19 posted on 04/09/2003 5:55:36 PM PDT by tubebender (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: eeriegeno
Taskforce Ironhorse will deal with the "Tikrit viper den".
20 posted on 04/09/2003 5:56:08 PM PDT by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson