Posted on 04/09/2003 9:28:50 PM PDT by Dec31,1999
THEY'RE BAAAAAACK!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
April 9, 2003 -- French President Jacques Chirac, having failed to keep Saddam Hussein in power, is now reordering the Axis of Weasel to cash in on the American-led liberation of Iraq. How do you say "chutzpah" in French?
Chirac yesterday demanded - yes, demanded! - that "the political, economic, humanitarian and administrative reconstruction of Iraq is a matter for the United Nations and for it alone."
And he intends to meet this week with fellow weasels Vladimir Putin, president of Russia, German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan to enlist them to the cause.
Frankly, they can stuff it.
To be sure, President Bush has endorsed giving the United Nations a "vital role" in the reconstruction of Iraq - though yesterday he defined that as purely advisory in nature.
No doubt, he did this to help provide political cover to Britain's Prime Minister Tony Blair, who has long pressed for a U.N. presence in postwar Iraq.
We're not unmindful of Blair's political concerns. He has risked his career to aid America in the War on Terror, and he deserves every possible consideration.
Emphasis on "possible."
The fact is that the United Nations has no legitimate role to play in the rebuilding of Iraq.
It was a big part of the problem in the run-up to the war - thus abdicating its claim to be a part of the solution.
As for France - well, what remains to be said?
Chirac's intransigence regarding military action was rooted in his need to protect that nation's economic interests.
Indeed, Chirac's outrageous demand is little more than a global demonstration of the old adage that "all politics is local."
With the collapse of Saddam's regime, Chirac is seeing the evaporation of decades' worth of commercial investment in Iraq by French companies.
Now, he's trying to get those same companies a piece of the rebuilding action.
Which is why his government is up in arms over a statement yesterday by Blair's trade and industry secretary, Patricia Hewitt, that obviously hit too close to home for comfort.
Asked what role she foresees for French and Russian firms in rebuilding postwar Iraq, Hewitt replied: "I must say, if I were an Iraqi minister in the new Iraqi government, I think I would personally take a poor view of companies that have been breaking U.N. sanctions and supporting Saddam's vile regime."
"Not acceptable," sniffed the French foreign ministry.
Dead-on accurate, we say.
Fact is, France and its allies put the kibosh on U.N. endorsement of the forced disarming of Saddam because they feared full disclosure of their treacherous under-the-table deals with his regime.
That left America, Britain and their allies to put thousands of young lives on the line to do the heavy lifting instead.
Now, the world is all but rid of the Butcher of Baghdad.
No thanks to France. Or Russia. Or Germany. Or Hans Blix and his cadre of nearsighted weapons "inspectors."
The Coalition of the Willing is bearing the burden. Alone.
And the Coalition of the Willing will determine the initial course of Iraq's reconstruction - alone - before control of the country is turned over to the Iraqi people themselves.
As for the unholy trinity of Chirac, Putin and Schroeder - they can sit back and watch from the sidelines.
Weasels.
Home
NEW YORK POST is a registered trademark of NYP Holdings, Inc. NYPOST.COM, NYPOSTONLINE.COM, and NEWYORKPOST.COM are trademarks of NYP Holdings, Inc. Copyright 2003 NYP Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
In fact, we need to start a "FREEREPUBLIQUE.COM.FR" in France.
It worked here. Why not there? There are plenty of upstanding folks in France. They are just being silenced and out-voted. Remember the election where Le Pen was defeated? He should have won, but the Leftist, Communist Media in France painted him as a Fascist maniac, so he lost.
That can be turned around.
Any Volunteers? Karl B comes to mind.
Personally I think she's great, even though I don't agree with her positions 100%.
Sweet. Once again, a Brit shows great skill in use of the English language. Truth laced with sarcasm. Uniquely British and highly effective.
EXCELLENT idea.
Hell, I'm still mad at us for liberating them in 1944"...
Well said. Iraq owes France tens of billions of dollars, mostly used to buy French weapons. France should not see one penny repaid.
Furthermore, there is $40 billion of "oil for food" money in French banks. It has been tied up for a long time and has most likely been treated as a slush fund for politicians. French governmental and commercial accounts in the US ought to be confiscated up to this level, then turned over to the new Iraqi government, and the French told to take their reimbursement from the oil for food fund.
Then we need to really punish and undermine the French behind the scenes any chance we get. Let a thousand Banana Wars bloom.
There has to be a very high price paid for spitting in our face.
-ccm
I'm a Mac user.
Try holding Alt and pressing 131. It's ASCII code. An ASCII table.
NO BLOOD FOR OIL!
The brave forces of the coalition and the Iraqi people did not sacrifice their blood for scum French oil!
Keep the faith friend for I will say as I have a few times in the past, Dubya' will handle it! I recall a few times in the past some freepers on the verge of going ballistic at Dubya's giving in to the Dem's and then giving in to the UN, funny though after all that giving in to everybody, supposedly, everyone that got their way is screaming and demanding while Dubya' is sitting on top of the world politically and holding all the cards for us. Personally I have a very good feeling for the future of the US and don't think the likes of, say the inhabitants France hold such an optimistic feeling.
Prolly true!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.