Skip to comments.Possible Plutonium Find Has Wide and Disturbing Implications
Posted on 04/10/2003 5:19:05 PM PDT by Axion
Possible Plutonium Find Has Wide and Disturbing Implications Summary
Apr 10, 2003 - 2202 GMT
Initial reports from coalition forces at Iraq's Al Tuwaitha nuclear complex indicate the presence of weapons-grade plutonium. If this is truly the case, and tests should confirm the plutonium's presence very shortly, the finding will have disturbing ramifications for the region and American foreign policy.
Coalition forces searching the Al Tuwaitha nuclear complex just south of Baghdad on April 10 have detected a type of radiation that could signal the presence of weapons-grade plutonium.
One of two materials is used to fuel nuclear explosions: uranium or plutonium.
The initial indications from Al Tuwaitha indicate the presence of plutonium-239. If true, this is worrying on numerous fronts. Uranium is far more abundant than plutonium and methods to separate, purify and mold weapons-grade uranium are not particularly technically advanced or expensive. Plutonium manufacture and purification, in contrast, is one of the most advanced weapon-fabrication processes. Plutonium weapons also require far less material -- as little as 5 kilograms -- and so plutonium weapons can use a wider array of lighter delivery vehicles. Unlike uranium, plutonium does not occur naturally in any form.
Using radiation detectors to determine the difference between uranium products and plutonium products without taking samples is a sketchy business, but there is one relatively clear difference. When plutonium-239 decays naturally it emits almost exclusively alpha particles, or positively charged helium nuclei. Uranium isotopes, on the other hand, emit beta particles (electrons) and gamma rays along with alpha radiation.
Alpha radiation normally cannot penetrate clothes and skin, whereas beta and gamma radiation certainly can. Initial reports from Al Tuwaitha indicate very high levels of radiation, yet there have been no reported casualties. That indicates that most of the radiation is probably not beta or gamma radiation, but alpha radiation, plutonium-239's calling card. Since the people who discovered the radiation at Al Tuwaitha have reported no health problems, the plutonium is most likely purified -- and therefore usable in a weapons program.
This has some disturbing implications.
No isotope of plutonium occurs naturally. In fact, it is normally created in only one of two ways. The first method involves bombarding a sample of uranium-238 with neutrons to make plutonium-239. In the second method, a uranium reactor creates the plutonium as a byproduct.
Unlike uranium enrichment programs required to make uranium-based nuclear weapons, plutonium enrichment and purification is an expensive and technically advanced process involving quite a bit of sophisticated equipment that supposedly is under a series of strict international controls.
If Iraq has obtained the equipment to manufacture or extract plutonium, it must either have some quite complex -- and highly restricted -- technology or a functioning nuclear reactor.
Such a confirmation would signal a colossal failure not only of the United Nations sanctions regime as relates to Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, but also of the broader global efforts to stem the spread of nuclear technology. The new fear would be that if Iraq, clearly on the to-watch list, can import nuclear materials and advanced nuclear technology, so can other nuclear wannabes.
It also means that United States will hardly want to depend upon the United Nations or the International Atomic Energy Agency for global nuclear security, for if it cannot prevent proliferation in the relatively cut-and-dried case of Iraq, it will be next to useless in cases where the subject has more international standing.
That is a big "may", but conveivable.
I have to acknowledge another freeper on another thread who made this initial suggestion. It's not original with me.
There's a third, and perhaps even more disturbing possibility: that the plutonium was produced elsewhere (say, Russia or France) and shipped in its purified form to Iraq.
Not necessarily. Look for a MADE IN FRANCE, RUSSIA, or NORTH KOREA sticker somewhere on the specimen.
I agree with this hypothesis. It would have been relatively easy to smuggle this out of the former Soviet Union. They may have had this stuff for decades or right after the fall of the FSU, using it for experimentation for further P239 development. But I'm sure it wasn't for some Badhdad University post-graduate physics project.
I think they already tried.
Remember the container ship flap? Where alpha radiation was detected?
And where after a great deal of searching and strange activity the source was supposedly "trace elements in a consignment of tiles"?
I agree. Perhaps we should declare the scientists who work on these programs to be "enemy combatants," and let it be known that we consider them legitimate military targets.
Tonight, THUR, Apr 10th, 2003 9:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. EST / 6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. PST
Chairman of the Iraqi-American Council
and the Unspun Debut of The Chamber-made Brigade's latest single
ALSO... CRBs and Bone-Headed Lie-Beral Quotes ('cause you just can't make this stuff up...)
All this, plus your calls (and possibly more)
HERE to listen LIVE!
Call in! 1-868-RadioFR!
Yup. These are weasel words (but nevertheless it is quite serious).
LOL - this is precious. I am still trying to parse it. Maybe after another long pour of single malt I will get it figured out. Oh - I quit beating my dog too.
You mean like make tiles with plutonium added to the mix, ship it to wherever your destination is, grind up the tiles, and chemically extract/concentrate the plutonium? This would actually be relatively trivial to do...
IMO, This is the most likely. It's my understanding that each reactor leaves a 'signature' in the isotopes and can be tracked exactly to its source. Someone is in serious trouble.
We have one, you're presently seeing it in Iraq.
Great phrase! May I use it for a tag, pretty please?
On a more serious note, this is an excellent article that explains many things that mystified me about the significance of plutonium, as opposed to plain old uranium. That is, I wasn't quite sure why this was such a significant find, if true. Now that I know, I think I'll go off and conjecture for a while...
Yes indeed. If this is the case, it's not Syria, or Palestine, or any of the other third rate middle east countries we have to worry about.
"Mind boggling implicatations", if this is the case is China, Russia, France, Germany, Iran, and North Korea!
If memory serves me from my CBR training WAY back when - the significance is two-fold. (1) Smaller quantity of fuel is required, and (2) Thermo-nuclear explosion (what used to be referred to as H-bomb) results from plutonium. Much more powerful explosion - megaton range, as opposed to kiloton range of uranium explosion.
Irrelevant is the word that describes the capability of the U.N.
The sad part is that it took so long to realize this, though many have realized it for years now, and now that it's out, what are we going to do about it?
What a sham the U.N. is and what a waste of U.S. dollars.
So, you are technically correct. Stratfor's point is still well taken.
Yes...and accordinding to the UN website we just made another payment today for humanitarian needs to the tune of 146 or 147 million, ya know, give or take a million or so.