Skip to comments.
The Clinton Army: [Rebuttal to] Left Claims Clinton Helped Military
NewsMax ^
| 11 April 2003
| Charles R. Smith
Posted on 04/11/2003 3:22:22 PM PDT by Stultis
Left Claims Clinton Helped Military
There are times that spin masters on the left get their facts so twisted that they end up looking like fools. It has been suggested by several spinners in Democrat Party ranks that it is "Bill Clinton's military" that is currently winning the war in Iraq.
The facts show that Bill Clinton halted military development, wasted critical weapons and allowed our forces to become dangerously weak.
No major weapon system was ever introduced during the Clinton years. In fact, many weapons systems were delayed or denied adequate funding.
No Patriot Here
For example, the Patriot missile was not improved during the Clinton years. The repeated pleas of U.S. military leaders that we needed some means to protect ourselves from the ballistic missile threat fell on deaf ears inside the Clinton White House.
Proposed upgrades to the Patriot were not tested, delayed or canceled by the Clinton administration in its feverish attempt to salvage the obsolete ABM treaty with the former Soviet Union. American national security came second to the wishes of Moscow.
The facts show that the Clinton administration traded and sold advanced U.S. military missile technology to China while denying funding to U.S. anti-missile systems that can counter the ballistic missile threat.
George Bush canceled the ABM treaty and immediately funded the Patriot PAC III program. However, events in the Middle East outpaced the frantic effort to ready the Patriot for war.
The war in Iraq forced the Bush administration to put Patriot PAC III into service without a formal testing regime. The PAC III has performed its job, protecting Kuwait and our troops from over a dozen Iraqi ballistic missiles.
Yet two Coalition aircraft have also been downed by the untested Patriot, an RAF Tornado and a U.S. Navy F-18 Hornet. Clearly, if the Clinton administration had allowed Patriot to be tested, the friendly fire incidents could have been avoided.
Clinton Missed the Target
The Clinton administration frequently misused, micromanaged and wasted advanced military weapon systems. Critics of the Clinton administration often cite the failed Tomahawk cruise missile strikes at a Sudanese aspirin factory and poorly targeted missile strikes at empty caves in Afghanistan.
USAF officials confirmed that the President Clinton had a history of bungling missile strikes, in particular targeting the Air Launched Cruise Missile (ALCM) by micromanagement from the Oval Office.
One specific example cited was the unsuccessful 1996 Desert Strike operation where USAF ALCMs with fragmentary warheads were incorrectly targeted on hardened Iraq bunkers on White House orders.
The White House bypassed the USAF Air Combat Command (ACC) and directly ordered B-52s to fire the ALCMs at a hardened Iraqi air defense command bunker. The frag warheads exploded harmlessly outside the Iraq bunker, causing no damage.
The Iraq bunker was destroyed later by a second, follow-on, strike of Navy Tomahawk missiles with conventional blast explosive warheads.
Bomb-Happy Clinton
President Clinton was frequently criticized in Congress and the Pentagon for being "bomb happy. " Clinton's policy of bombing with high-tech weapons rapidly used up critical U.S. military inventories. The shortages, according to DOD officials, were a direct result of Clinton's Defense budget shortfalls for the hard-pressed U.S. military.
According to Defense planners, the most critical shortfall was in Air Launched Cruise Missiles. In late 1998, Boeing was contracted by the USAF to convert the final remaining 130 nuclear-tipped AGM-86B missiles into conventional "Bunker Buster" ALCMs with 2,000-pound warheads.
The U.S. used about 330 Tomahawk cruise missiles and 90 ALCMs during Desert Fox strikes now known as the "Monica Storm" campaign. All the USAF-launched ALCMs were Block 1 types equipped with heavy conventional warheads for bunker busting. In addition, 230 laser-guided bombs were used and about 250 dumb "iron" Mk. 82 bombs.
According to recon results of Desert Fox, the cruise missile and laser bomb attacks left most of Iraqi air defenses intact.
Era of Delay and Decay
The Clinton administration proposed that the B-1 bomber be retired early. The very same B-1 that recently dropped four 2,000-pound bombs on a bunker where Saddam may have been having dinner.
The Clinton administration delayed the Global Hawk, the Predator, the GPS-guided bomb systems and the Long Bow Apache, and wanted to trim the number of aircraft carriers down to eight.
Many of the weapons that the U.S. should be fielding now are still in development because of Clinton delays and under-funding.
The Clinton administration delayed the V-22 Osprey, F-22 Raptor, the Joint Strike Fighter and the Comanche attack helicopter. In addition, the U.S. military is still trying to make up critical shortages in the Milstar space communications program.
The Air Force, Navy and Marines are also scrambling to make up critical shortages in air-refueling tankers, frequently cut out of the Clinton budget requests.
During the Clinton years, the U.S. military had to cut valuable training, live-fire exercises and flight hours in order to meet demanding deployment funding spent in Haiti and Kosovo.
In fact, the U.S. Air Force had to turn to the United Arab Emirates in order to upgrade the F-16 Fighting Falcon. The UAE agreed to purchase advanced versions of the F-16 that the USAF could not afford. The UAE export funded further development of the F-16, which eventually made its way into the U.S. Air Force inventory.
Bill Clinton never helped the U.S. military and often hurt American national security. It is an outright lie to claim that Bill Clinton has any responsibility for the current success in the desert of Iraq.
TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintonlegacy; military; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-52 next last
1
posted on
04/11/2003 3:22:22 PM PDT
by
Stultis
To: Stultis
Clinton helped clinton. Anything else is lies and b.s.
To: All
|
The king and queen of the free ride
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3
posted on
04/11/2003 3:28:54 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Stultis
When confronted by spinners stating this,
Just laugh.
Upproriously.
4
posted on
04/11/2003 3:38:34 PM PDT
by
MonroeDNA
(Communists & Socialists: They only survive through lies.)
To: MonroeDNA
The current military is winning this war in spite of Clinton's decimation of it.
5
posted on
04/11/2003 3:39:56 PM PDT
by
Mrs.Liberty
("Oh people, this is freedom! "...Liberated Iraqi man, 09 APR 2003)
To: Stultis; madfly; Tailgunner Joe; Ernest_at_the_Beach
A thorough and stinging indictment.
6
posted on
04/11/2003 3:40:12 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(Because there are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: Stultis
Bill Clinton is a rapist.
To: Stultis
Clinton helped himself by selling the arms forces secrets for donation for his lie-bary and lots of other stuff.what he didn't sell he gave to the un and his gangerster buddies there.
8
posted on
04/11/2003 3:44:09 PM PDT
by
solo gringo
(Always Ranting Always Rite)
To: Stultis
To say that this is Clinton's military is laughable on its face. The military is more than equipment and technology. It is blood and guts and courage and sacrifice....and leadership that brings that out in others. Bush has it and Clinton does not. To compare Clinton to Bush is like comparing Pee Wee Herman to Joe Torre of the Yankees....there is no comparison.
9
posted on
04/11/2003 3:44:54 PM PDT
by
irish4
To: All; Stultis; Fred Mertz; VOA; Vetnet; Joy Angela; conservogirl; Joe 6-pack; Angelwood; ...
...Time to ask yourself...
...why isn't Friend of HILLARY...
...TOM BROKAW...
...reporting all this to US...
...while still telling US on TV...
...that there was a Massacre of Civilians...
...at the Bridge of NO GUN RI...
...by our U.S. 7th Cavalry...
...during the Korean War...
...when there really NEVER was..?
Just ask HILLARY RODHAM, who now sits on our U.S. Senate's Armed Services Committee overseeing our U.S. Military in Time of War.
Signed:..ALOHA RONNIE Guyer / Vet-U.S. 7th Cavalry's Opening Days of the Vietnam War 1965-66
http://www.LZXRAY.com/guyer_collection.htm (Photos)
10
posted on
04/11/2003 3:46:46 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com ..,)
To: Stultis
11
posted on
04/11/2003 3:47:55 PM PDT
by
backhoe
(Just an old keyboard cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the sunset...)
To: Stultis; All
12
posted on
04/11/2003 3:49:39 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com ..,)
To: irish4
Personally... I'm very glad that although I was commissioned by Xlinton, I carried a rifle for real under President Bush.
13
posted on
04/11/2003 3:52:52 PM PDT
by
Terabitten
(Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of All Who Threaten It)
To: Stultis
I ate bananas in 2002. That's why we won in Iraq. It makes as much sense as Mr. Loathe-the-Military saving us all.
Another ploy of liberals is to claim, "Well, at least Bill Clinton didn't cripple the military like conservatives said he did."
It should be remembered that Congress was pushing the Administration during this time to keep military spending at adequate levels.
14
posted on
04/11/2003 3:53:54 PM PDT
by
JoeSchem
To: Stultis
I loved it the other night when the forehead guy of Hannity and Colmes told Mike Reagan that it was Clintons army and that Pelosi has always supported the war in Iraq!
He sure must feel stupid given what Nancy Pelosi said (Again) today!
As Rush says if it was Clinton's army that gave us victory than was it Clinton's recession as well????? He put more enrgy into the economy than into the military.
15
posted on
04/11/2003 3:55:04 PM PDT
by
Kay Soze
(For every 100 Osamas created in the fight on terrorism - we shall simply elect one more "W")
To: ALOHA RONNIE; MonroeDNA
Its even simpler for me to explain; I just say to the moron spinners that the Military is so good now, (Iraq and Afghanistan) because they no longer have a commander in chief who hates them. A commander in chief who no longers lies, cheats and steals from them, one who sends them in Haiti to get shot being policemen. A Cand C who wouldnt even salute the Marines at the White House. Bill Clinton asa commander in chief was an insult to the American Military. He hated them. He cut their budget, he sent them to fight political wars. He was and still is the biggest asshole of president we ever had. Now that W is C in C, there is pride in the Military again, and the Clinton spinners can go to hell.
16
posted on
04/11/2003 4:00:52 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
To: Stultis; Jimmy Valentine's brother; Angelwood; Joy Angela; conservogirl; goldilucky; abigail2; ...
17
posted on
04/11/2003 4:03:26 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com ..,)
To: Stultis; cardinal4; All
18
posted on
04/11/2003 4:13:05 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com ..,)
To: Kay Soze
Isn't is true that the current deficits the Dems are whining about have been incurred in large part due to the necessity to rebuild our military and intelligence after 8 years of Clinton cuts?
Bubba "balanced the budget" with huge cuts to the Defense Department -( and creative accounting!!). The wealth of the 90s was phoney - just like our phoney sense of national security was during that time. People elected a phoney President and phoney results are what we got. But hey, "It's the economy, stupid".
To: cardinal4
NEVER FORGET
It's
Friends:
HILLARY RODHAM
BILL CLINTON
JOHN KERRY
WALTER CRONKITE
of:
HO CHI MINH
MAO TSE TUNG
FIDEL CASTRO
SADDAM HUSSEIN
OSAMA bin LADEN
Verses:
US
F-O-R-E-V-E-R
NEVER FORGET
20
posted on
04/11/2003 4:19:51 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com ..,)
To: cardinal4
...Post #10 =
...Perfect CLINTON U.S. History..
21
posted on
04/11/2003 4:21:51 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com ..,)
To: Stultis
Your damn right its Clintons military. If it were not we would have more ships, planes and men to fight it. Clintons much bragged about reductions in the "size of government" were almost entirely if not ENTIRELY at the expense of THE MILITARY. You could look it up! He bragged about it, remember>
22
posted on
04/11/2003 4:23:12 PM PDT
by
TalBlack
To: ALOHA RONNIE
How anyone can say that Clinton deserves the credit for building our great miliatary is out of their mind! I could not beleive my ears when I heard Pelosi's remarks. Mike Savage is right - liberalism is mental illness.
To: ALOHA RONNIE
To: Stultis
I don't buy any of this. It's clear that the military was reduced over the past several years under the post-Cold War "peace dividend" thinking.
However, the real difference between the current CIC and clinton is the manner in which the battle orders were given to the military by the civilian authority. I think GW set out clear objectives, then let the military run the war without the political interference which was the hallmark of the clinton administration.
This war isn't about budgets. It's about presidential leadership, clear objectives, and the understanding that the military is for breaking things and killing people.
To: JoeSchem
And ... Rush still says that the ONLY TRUE CUTS IN SPENDING during the x42 years WAS FOR MILITARY.
The reductions in the budget from 8% to 6% were said to be CUTS by the democrats. It wasn't a cut at all - it was a reduction in the INCREASED EXPENSES. Pathetic!
26
posted on
04/11/2003 4:40:05 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
To: Stultis; *war_list; W.O.T.; Dog Gone; Grampa Dave; blam; Sabertooth; NormsRevenge; Gritty; ...
27
posted on
04/11/2003 4:45:21 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Where is Saddam? and where is Tom Daschle?)
To: Stultis
"Monica Storm"? I always just called his adventures the "Pubic Wars".
28
posted on
04/11/2003 4:46:11 PM PDT
by
Lee Enfield
( Doing it in your name anyway.)
To: cardinal4; Stultis; Joy Angela; conservogirl; Fred Mertz; VOA; Joe 6-pack; Sabertooth; ...
Oooop's...
T'is Post #16 =
Perfect CLINTON U.S. History,
not my Post #10 =
My Mistake #1,000.
29
posted on
04/11/2003 4:56:24 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com ..,)
To: conservogirl
Conservatism =
MADLY in Love with FREEDOM
Liberalism =
MADLY in Love with HATE
30
posted on
04/11/2003 4:59:37 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com ..,)
To: Stultis
The liberals will be calling it Clinton's army 50 years from now.
To: Stultis
index bump
32
posted on
04/11/2003 6:53:49 PM PDT
by
ellery
To: Stultis
About two weeks ago, I saw Barney (Fag) Frank being interviewed on CNN. He was the one that claimed it was Bill Clinton's army that won the victory.
33
posted on
04/11/2003 6:58:58 PM PDT
by
U S Army EOD
(Served in Korea, Vietnam and still fighting America's enemies on Home Front)
To: Stultis
When Lieberals say stuff like this, they are hoping that we have forgotten.
FR Flashback Time.
Can You Name This Country?
709,000 regular (active duty) service personnel
293,000 reserve troops
Eight standing Army divisions
20 Air Force and Navy air wings with 2,000 combat aircraft 232 strategic bombers 13 strategic ballistic missile submarines with 3,114 nuclear warheads on 232 missiles 500 ICBMs with 1,950 warheads.
Four aircraft carriers and 121 surface combat ships and submarines, plus all the support bases, shipyards and logistical assets needed to sustain such a naval force.
Is this country Russia?. . . No.
Red China ? . . . No.
Great Britain ? . . Wrong Again.
France?....Nope.
USA? . . . You are still wrong.
Give up??
Well, don't feel too bad if you are unable to identify this global superpower, because this country no longer exists. It has vanished. These are the American military forces that HAVE DISAPPEARED since the 1992 election of Bill Clinton and Al Gore....Sleep well America.
Most of you prolly recognize the above, it was posted here frequently from Dec.1999-Nov.2000, as well as being circulated via email and reported on Rush.
To: cardinal4
"He was and still is the biggest asshole of president we ever had". Yes, Clinton is all that. A few years back I remember a military person responding to a similar quote I made in a forum - I think it was NewsMax - that Clinton was the most despised President by the American military in the history of the U.S.A.
I also took great pleasure in reading somewhere on the Internet today that Clinton was loudly booed by an audience in Manhattan where he made an appearance at the Beacon Theatre. And he didn't like it. I was born and raised a few blocks away from the Beacon and if I remember correctly, it's on 72nd Street and Broadway. Near the Dakota where many Hollywood libs live. And Clinton was booed here? Seems like the only place he isn't booed these days is in Europe. Well, Europe, you can have him.
35
posted on
04/11/2003 7:00:36 PM PDT
by
maxwellp
(Throw the U.N. in the garbage where it belongs.)
To: Stultis
BIG TIME, LET US NEVER FORGET, BUMP!
To: Stultis
Great post!
As much as I hate to see people having to spend precious time responding to scumbag liberal simpletons like Matt Miller, it is always good to take the opportunities they hand you to pound home the facts, and pound home the truth. These are the things that fuel the liberal scumbags' worst nightmares.
Again, congratulations on a great post.
Bookmarked.
To: Stultis

Clinton did far more to assist other third world military forces than our own,...and at our expense.
38
posted on
04/11/2003 8:23:14 PM PDT
by
Cvengr
To: Stultis
| There are times that spin masters on the left get their facts so twisted that they end up looking like fools. It has been suggested by several spinners in Democrat Party ranks that it is "Bill Clinton's military" that is currently winning the war in Iraq. I doubt that it's even necessary to rebut this. The usual 23% will believe it, and everyone else will laugh out loud if any Democrat says it.
|
39
posted on
04/11/2003 8:25:30 PM PDT
by
Nick Danger
(More rallys planned! www.freerepublic.net)
To: ALOHA RONNIE
There's only one reason why Hillary would be placed on this committee. And that is that she is an Illuminati witch and mind control slave handler. Reference source: The Illuminati Formula used to create an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave, Appendix 1, Programmers, by Wheeler and Springmeier.
It is my understanding that her role is to destroy our military from within.
To: conservogirl
Didn't hitlery use money from the defense budget to pay for her senatorial campain travel and security? I don't have the references but I'm sure I read it somewhere.
41
posted on
04/11/2003 8:58:31 PM PDT
by
BabsC
To: U S Army EOD
I saw Barney (Fag) Frank being interviewed on CNN. He was the one that claimed it was Bill Clinton's army that won the victory. Maybe he was referring to China?
42
posted on
04/12/2003 1:30:37 AM PDT
by
tsomer
To: MonroeDNA
Just laugh. But I think it's important to raise up facts like this. I'm thinking of the set of voters who will too easily be persuaded to vote for someone other than GW next election. Those who can be reached with reason can help us ensure that GW's war on terror rolls on unabated.
There's a lot at stake now, and facts will help us reach the undecided.
43
posted on
04/12/2003 1:35:50 AM PDT
by
risk
(Never forget.)
To: Stultis
BTT
To: U S Army EOD
Mort Kondrake said this on Brit Hume's show within the last 5 days. I almost gagged a mag right then and there. I just finished reading Deriliction of Duty and there's a boatload of information in it about Clinton and the military. In addition to all the evidence in this article, we lost alot of experienced men that just could not stomach Clinton. I have often wondered what that loss of experience cost us.
To: ALOHA RONNIE
Thanks for the ping. I still have that sign in my basic load of truth. I'm sure I'll have more opportunities to use it.
To: Stultis
47
posted on
05/09/2003 9:38:20 AM PDT
by
SerpentDove
(Each post focus-group tested for maximum wallop.)
To: Stultis
Whoops...bumped the wrong thread.....
:-S
48
posted on
05/09/2003 9:40:11 AM PDT
by
SerpentDove
(Each post focus-group tested for maximum wallop.)
To: Stultis
Here's another rebuttal:
Me: So let me get this straight. Bill Clinton should get more responsibility for current conditions, because he was in office for 8 of the last 10 years, and there isn't much Bush could have done in the last 2 years.
Lefty: Exactly:
Me: Good, we agree. Now that we're done talking about the ECONOMY, let's talk about the military.
To: Stultis
50
posted on
05/26/2003 9:00:39 PM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
(LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson