Skip to comments.
PRISONS FOR CHILDREN DISCOVERED IN BAGHDAD
Agence France Presse ^
| 04/08/03
| Agence France Presse
Posted on 04/16/2003 12:44:30 PM PDT by walford
Accuracy in Media has also learned: The existence of childrens prisons in Iraq was reported last September by Scott Ritter, former U.N. weapons inspector. Ritter said that his inspection team had first come across a childrens prison in Baghdad January 1998. The prison Ritter saw held toddlers to pre-adolescents and was for the children of parents who opposed the regime.
TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bias; children; iraq; media; saddam; savagery; scottritter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator
To: walford
The ONLY one SAD-HAM couldn't buy was OUR PRESIDENT, and he thought France, Russia and Germany would SCARE our President away from invasion.
To: walford
Was Scott at the children's prison looking for a date? I guess they don't have child sex laws in Iraq.
To: walford
Dime store psychiatry alert!
Here's my own read on this. Ritter saw and was alarmed by the prisons. It made him mad. He beacme a loose cannon. In the Senate hearings Biden busted him, something snapped -- Ritter was vanquished before the alpha dog or some such rot. Ritter however tried to work through his feelings regarding the abused children in Iraqi prisons by redirecting that feeling into sexually caring for random acquantices in "Kiddie" interent chat-rooms -- even though he knew many of those kiddies were other role-playing adults and internet cops. That assuaged his inner morality's sense of vanquishment -- consistent with the "everything is perverted and wasted" sense that came with that vanquishment. To further wear that perversion's hair shirt -- to complete his sense of "submission" to the dark side -- he took up the Iraqi Regime's cause.
End dime store psychiatry,
24
posted on
04/16/2003 3:00:19 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: TommyDale
SICK SOB, Off with his b----! (Like the old days). I personally know 2 of 4 men who performed this procedure in a barn after a "SICK SOB" was caught "with" one of their daughters(7 yr. old). Guess what? He Was CURED!!!!!!!!!! and what better way to end the spread of "Lucifer's" offspring? [I THINK HE GOT OFF EASY].
To: walford
If he knew about these prisons and did nothing about it, this makes him a monster!!!
To: walford
Never mind this unimportant nonsense...
WHERE ARE ALL THE ARTIFACTS FROM THE MUSEUM?!?! WHEN WILL WE STOP THE LOOTING?!? </sarcasm>
27
posted on
04/16/2003 4:00:24 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
(All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
To: Redcloak
Funny how the underground and "sealed in concrete by the vacating regime" adult prisons/torture chambers are also being ignored by the media.
Perhaps funny is the wrong word.....
28
posted on
04/16/2003 4:50:51 PM PDT
by
sarasmom
To: mhking
"Intimidation and Coercion: In the past, Iraq did not hesitate to use pressure tactics to obtain information about the inspectors. Often the pressure was quite crude. During the UNSCOM period, one inspector was reportedly filmed in a compromising situation and blackmailed." - Source :
Wolfowitz Comments before Council on Foreign Relations There's no telling who this inspector was, but it would certainly be interesting to find out for sure.
29
posted on
04/16/2003 5:26:39 PM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: Mister Baredog
I take it the idiots at DU don't know that even the Iraqi regime referred to these prisons as "prisons." They did not refer to them as "orphanages" and they made no secret about what those places were for and caring for kids in order to adopt them out was not one of them.
The Saddam-loving idiots at DU are the very first to apply the word "orphanage" to these places. The reason it hasn't come up before is because everyone but the idiots at DU know the kids are not orphaned but actually have FAMILIES, and the families are waiting outside the walls in the hopes of seeing the youngsters again. Orphans by definition do not have families.
30
posted on
04/16/2003 5:40:06 PM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: walford
We read this and think how terrible. But we have a bureaucracy here in the US doing the same type of thing.
Support us and do what we say. Or we WILL take your kids
There have been more than one case were parents have been told this. If they resisted putting there kids on drugs. Or not raising there way.
Now this is not to the same degree but its a start. shows what happens when bureaucracy goes unchecked.
Let the leftist liberal RATs have there way. this is were it will go!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson