There isn't *anybody* who has corroborated what McNutty claims - and your refusal to read the work done on this subject, the extensive comparison of visual imagery in the way of photos showing debris, insulation and glass from the many broken windows to what the "captured IR" (that's "Infra-Red") on video shows is just straight-away, sheer declared ignorance.
The duration of the 'plume' after a rifle is fired, that should have lasted less than a single video frame was examined for each 'claimed' case of gunfire BUT this duration lasted for many frames, the OBVIOUS abscence of "warm rifle barrels" (their heat signature showing up on video) was notably absent in each case of these cases as well -
- NOTHING repeat !!NOTHING!! supports McNutty's contentions of 'gunfire' in the IR video except McNutty!
Those were the conclusions of both Ian Goddard and Vector Data Systems and several other experts in the field of IR.
THERE WAS ample oportunity for *other* sources of that IR however. Such as the very warm engine of the CEV in that one scene - I have seen the video my self on that one - at it does indeed appear at the REAR of that CEV reflecting off debris on teh ground - those same scenes that show NO human beings and the CEV (the 'tank' as you guys put it) BACKING over positions OCCUPIED by so-called 'shooters' in very close quaters is absolutely preposterous - it's also NOT the case as visible still photos show.
Here is the research performed by Vector Data Systems (of course, you won't download it NOR will you examine so why do I even bother?) on the IR imagery:
http://www.gospelcom.net/apologeticsindex/pdf/vds.pdf
I also noted in your reply that you responded with the usual knee-jerk supposition that the other party is simply 'lying' yet you provide nothing (BUT your afore-mentioned CONJECTURE) as 'supporing argument'.
*That* doesn't wash.
What is on WANR is not due to reflected solar energy on glass. It would not repeat the way it does on the tape if that were true.
So, Underpants Jim, have you seen WANR or not?