Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.N inspectors could help verify Iraq weapons but won't be 'dogs on a leash'
Associated Press ^ | 4-17-0 | DAFNA LINZER

Posted on 04/17/2003 4:08:10 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:42:18 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

UNITED NATIONS (AP) -- U.N. arms inspectors are ready to get back into Iraq to finish the job of looking for any chemical, biological or nuclear weapons but don't want to work under a new U.S.-led disarmament effort.

"We're not dogs on a leash," said chief U.N. inspector Hans Blix, who said it was key his teams remain independent. He said U.N. teams would be willing to confirm any discoveries of banned weapons the Americans report, but repeatedly noted that U.S. troops haven't found any such weapons thus far.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Government; Israel; Japan; Mexico; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blix; irrelevant; un; wanker

1 posted on 04/17/2003 4:08:10 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Oldeconomybuyer
We're not dogs on a leash," said chief U.N. inspector Hans Blix, who said it was key his teams remain independent

hmmm NOW he wants to be independent. Funny how slavish he was his first two times in IRAQ

3 posted on 04/17/2003 4:21:42 PM PDT by Nat Turner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
We're not dogs on a leash," said chief U.N. inspector Hans Blix, who said it was key his teams remain independent

This sounds like a quote from the Onion. Exuse me while I laugh my --- off.

4 posted on 04/17/2003 4:22:04 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (Politics = Poly + Ticks = Many bloodsucking vermin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Oh, Hans; does this mean you won't let us drag you to the WMD sites, kicking and screaming, and rub your plantagenet nose in it?
5 posted on 04/17/2003 4:35:38 PM PDT by Migraine (my grain is pretty straight today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
In other news: American officials have accused Syria of possessing chemical weapons. And today Hans Blix, U.N. weapons inspector, offered to spend the next three months not finding any of their chemicals weapons too.
6 posted on 04/17/2003 4:40:34 PM PDT by schaketo (UN lackeys and their ilk now take Iraq's place in the "Axis of Evil"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Of course the UN inspectors WILL be "dogs on a leash." More specifically, they will be puppies on a carpet. Our people will lead them to the messes, and stick their noses in it. That's what they've earned; that's how they should be treated.

Did I miss anything?

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, not yet up on UPI, and FR, "Who's Next?"

Latest book(let), "to Restore Trust in America."

7 posted on 04/17/2003 4:49:38 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob ("Saddam has left the building. Heck, the building has left the building.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"We're not dogs on a leash," said chief U.N. inspector Hans Blix,

He was already Saddam's b*tch. Why the concern now??

Becki

8 posted on 04/17/2003 5:03:29 PM PDT by Becki (Pray continually for our leaders and our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Becki
"We're not dogs on a leash,"

You're right, Hans. I think "jackals" is more appropriate.
9 posted on 04/17/2003 5:09:13 PM PDT by salmon76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: salmon76
"We're not dogs on a leash,"

Take a guess. It rhymes with Kurds.
10 posted on 04/17/2003 5:28:09 PM PDT by salmon76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
It seems that ol' Hans really, really needs the work, don't you think?
11 posted on 04/17/2003 5:31:31 PM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
BUMP #7.
12 posted on 04/17/2003 5:32:53 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I am too busy laughing my butt off at this farce to comment intelligently on it.
13 posted on 04/17/2003 5:52:20 PM PDT by exit82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
but don't want to work under a new U.S.-led disarmament effort.

Isn't he suppose to be NEUTRAL and do what the U.N. tells him to do? Since when does HE get to set ANY terms?

Besides, by the time they would ever let them back in there, he'll be officially "retired."

"We're not dogs on a leash," said chief U.N. inspector Hans Blix

You could have fooled me.

14 posted on 04/17/2003 5:54:47 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The UN, if they are wanted as inspectors anymore, will be free to go anywhere except Army posts.
15 posted on 04/17/2003 5:56:14 PM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson