Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shuttle Doomed at Takeoff (Astronauts doomed from the start)
abc news ^ | 4/18/2003 | Lisa Stark and Gina Treadgold

Posted on 04/18/2003 6:01:28 PM PDT by TLBSHOW

Shuttle Doomed at Takeoff

Telltale Heat Spike Was Recorded After Debris Strike

April 18 — Investigators now have the strongest evidence yet that the space shuttle Columbia's left wing was critically punctured during liftoff, when falling debris started the fatal chain of events that led to the breakup of the shuttle when it re-entered Earth's atmosphere, ABCNEWS has learned.

The evidence comes from an old magnetic tape recorder that is part of the Orbiter Experiment Support System, sources said.

It shows an unusual temperature increase in a key sensor just behind the leading edge of the left wing near the spot where foam that fell from the shuttle's external fuel tank is suspected of striking the shuttle, just 81 seconds into the flight.

The temperature spike happens within the next 40 seconds. Usually during this phase of flight, the temperature would be decreasing or holding steady, sources said.

"All the evidence is pointing there," a knowledgeable source told ABCNEWS. "It's kind of like the lady in California. Everybody knows it's her, but they just can't officially say it yet." The data comes from a temperature sensor behind the front spar of the left wing near a shuttle's protective thermal panels known as reinforced carbon carbon panels, or RCC. These panels are supposed to protect the shuttle from the heat of re-entry.

This video image released by NASA shows the likely catastrophic debris strike approximately 81 seconds after liftoff. Pieces of debris are observed ahead of the left wing. (NASA, HO/AP Photo)

Investigators say it was a breach in the left wing near the leading edge that led to the breakup of Columbia on Feb. 1 when it plunged back into the Earth's atmosphere at more than 20,000 mph. All seven astronauts on board perished.

The Columbia Accident Investigation Board is still trying to piece together the puzzle of the shuttle disaster — but they have already recommended that NASA do a much better job of inspecting RCC panels for any weaknesses prior to liftoff.

The board is concerned that as the shuttle fleet ages, the RCC panels may be more susceptible to failure — and that Columbia's age may have been a factor in the shuttle accident. Columbia flew its first mission in 1981, making it the oldest shuttle in the fleet.

The board will hear from more experts at another public hearing next week. Members will start to write their report at the end of May and hope to issue it sometime in June.

None of the information from the recorder could have helped save the doomed shuttle. It was not available to ground control at launch, and controllers would not have noticed the spike until the shuttle landed and, weeks later, analyzed the data.

And even if they had known, it is open to debate what could have been done.

"If they suspected the damage, could they have done something? Probably not," a source said. "But you never want to say there was nothing that could have been done, because you never know what 1,000 people all working on one problem might come up with."


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: caib; doomed; nasa; shuttle; sts107; takeoff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
flashback;

Posted on 02/02/2003 9:35 PM EST by TLBSHOW

Astronauts doomed from the start

THE seven astronauts on space shuttle Columbia may have been doomed in the first moments after they were shot into space 16 days ago.

NASA officials are investigating whether loose foam from an external tank that struck Columbia's left wing during takeoff contributed to its disintegration under the stress of re-entering the Earth's atmosphere – one of the most dangerous parts of any shuttle mission. The last words between mission control at Houston and shuttle commander Rick Husband gave no clue of impending disaster:

Mission control: "Columbia, Houston, we see your tyre pressure messages and we did not copy your last."

Cdr Husband: "Roger, but . . ." No more was heard.

The homeward-bound space shuttle broke up in flames and trails of smoke and vapour over Texas yesterday, killing all seven astronauts aboard.

Astronauts doomed from the start

1 posted on 04/18/2003 6:01:28 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
They would not have been doomed if we had a back up shuttle ready everytime we sent one up. The shuttle was up long enough for a shuttle to have been fueled and launched.

This was suggested years ago after the first disaster...but the acountants nixed the idea.
2 posted on 04/18/2003 6:05:48 PM PDT by dinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Interesting how the furor over this event died so quickly. It barely makes the papers with so much else going on.
3 posted on 04/18/2003 6:07:11 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinok
Actually they could have jettisoned the pod had the timing been right.
4 posted on 04/18/2003 6:08:18 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Either way...the process is flawed.
No back up...
5 posted on 04/18/2003 6:09:28 PM PDT by dinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz; fooman; Jael; Lancey Howard; #3Fan; Yasotay; Cool Guy; Willie Green
ping
6 posted on 04/18/2003 6:11:16 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (The gift is to see the truth.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinok
Going into space is dangerous... Thank God these wonderful people were willing to take the risk and challenge the odds. We are all better off for it.

7 posted on 04/18/2003 6:15:47 PM PDT by Stars N Stripes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Ultimately the died because of politically correct foam.
8 posted on 04/18/2003 6:17:43 PM PDT by twntaipan (Defend American Liberty: Defeat a demoncRAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twntaipan
That should say: Ultimately they died because of politically correct foam.
9 posted on 04/18/2003 6:18:27 PM PDT by twntaipan (Defend American Liberty: Defeat a demoncRAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
If they had been paying attention to the data they could
have aborted to Rota, Spain before even getting to orbit.
10 posted on 04/18/2003 6:20:27 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
nasaproblems.com
April 7, 2003

Space Shuttle Columbia is gone... but has the countdown already started for a third shuttle disaster? There were two reasons for the Columbia disaster: a system failure and a management failure. We may never know the exact cause for the system failure, but the reasons for the management failures are there for all to see. Unless the Office of the President and Congress address the following management failures... then indeed, the countdown has already started for the third shuttle disaster!

NASA Memo: "support a launch opportunity as early as Fall of 2003."

http://www.nasaproblems.com/

11 posted on 04/18/2003 6:22:54 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (The gift is to see the truth.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Now one piece of the puzzle has been revealed. I still think that the foam was weighed down with ice from it's splattering pattern when it struck the wing.
12 posted on 04/18/2003 6:30:39 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Astronauts doomed from the start.

Aren't we all?

13 posted on 04/18/2003 6:40:49 PM PDT by Sangamon Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Jettison what pod? and when? What are you talking about?

Seems there's a provocative design problem with the external tank foam and launching in the winter. Having a hot back up is certainly not a bad idea, nor to always launch with the Space Station as a life boat option.

14 posted on 04/18/2003 7:00:07 PM PDT by bellevuesbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
Ping
15 posted on 04/18/2003 7:00:45 PM PDT by Calpernia (Nancy = Bipolar - "This has been a public service announcement")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
And, just in the nick of time...
Mojave, California, April 18, 2003:

Scaled Composites today unveiled the existence of a commercial manned space program. This previously hidden, active research program has been in the works at its facility for two years. This program includes an airborne launcher (the White Knight), a space ship (SpaceShipOne), rocket propulsion, avionics, simulator and ground support elements.

Master of Ceremonies Cliff Robertson introduced Burt Rutan who explained the history and the components of the program. Other dignitaries who attended the event were Dr. Maxim Faget (pioneer configuratioin designer of the early NASA space program from the Mercury through the Apollo programs), Erik Lindbergh (grandson of Charles Lindbergh and President of the Lindbergh Foundation), and Dennis Tito (Soyuz space tourist).

Further information about the space program and high-resolution photographs are available at the Scaled Composites website: www.scaled.com.

Photo of spacecraft

These are not models, mockups, or non-flying prototypes. That is a real spaceship sitting on the tarmac there. The mothership White Knight has been flying for almost a year.

American ingenuity triumphs again.

16 posted on 04/18/2003 7:06:12 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic and Monarchist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: konaice
"If they had been paying attention to the data they could
have aborted to Rota, Spain before even getting to orbit."

Can you square your statement with this from the article:
"None of the information from the recorder could have helped save the doomed shuttle. It was not available to ground control at launch, and controllers would not have noticed the spike until the shuttle landed and, weeks later, analyzed the data."

17 posted on 04/18/2003 7:06:22 PM PDT by ironman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Guess you were right all along. Somehow I suspect the people who should now be apologizing to you will not.
18 posted on 04/18/2003 7:12:05 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bellevuesbest
I call it a pod because thats what they are in, but you can bring the orbiter back down 1 Engine BEN, last chance TAL is Morocco on two engines, right before ECO. Sorry if my lingo didn't make sense or was of technical nature. Figured anyone who knew, would know what I was referring to.

No one has ever mentioned the possibility of woodpecker damage to it.
19 posted on 04/18/2003 7:29:42 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ironman
"Can you square your statement with this from the article: "
Proves my point.

They had data, but did not bother to watch it or (apparently) even trasmit it to ground or cockpit.

The data was clearly out of norm.

If even a rudimentary computer analysis was watching this it would have stood out like a sore thumb.

See how wounderfull hind sight is?
20 posted on 04/18/2003 7:33:22 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson