Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NOW defends Scott Peterson's right to choose
Jewish World Review ^ | 4/22/02 | Scott Ott

Posted on 04/22/2003 12:55:36 PM PDT by Caleb1411

The National Organization for Women has decided to broaden its fundraising base by supporting a man's right to choose in addition to the traditional woman's right to choose.

In this case, the man is Scott Peterson, currently staying in private quarters as a guest of officials in Stanislaus County, CA. A local NOW chapter spokesman issued a formal apology to Mr. Peterson for the "grievous injustice he has suffered at the hands of those who would limit his rights."

The spokesman called on local officials to drop one of the two murder charges against Mr. Peterson on the grounds that the late-term fetus his wife carried was not a person.

"If he had killed his wife then removed a tape worm from her and it died, he would only be charged with one murder," said the NOW spokesman. "That is a precisely accurate analogy using irrefutable logic."

A memo from the NOW legal department also defended Mr. Peterson's alleged decision because of the extraordinary situation.

"Terminating the fetus at that late date was still permissible," according to the memo,"because there was a clear threat to the life and health of the mother."

JWR contributor Scott Ott publishes the satirical website ScrappleFace.com, whose motto is "News fairly unbalanced. We report. You decipher."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: abortion; lacipeterson; prolife; scottpeterson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: Kieri
You are dead on right. Look how many people on this thread fooled by this piece. Truth is as strange as fiction or something like that.
41 posted on 04/22/2003 3:16:54 PM PDT by Prolifeconservative (If there is another terrorist attack, the womb is a very unsafe place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt; Motherbear
Again, check out post #36, realizing as you do that the satire really is only negligibly removed from the reality.
42 posted on 04/22/2003 3:18:24 PM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: Motherbear
Actually, since the NOW hags accord human babies as much respect as they do tapeworms, I think it's brilliant.

I think if anyone were to wager that NOW members accord equal respect to tapeworms and babies, he'd lose . . . because he'd find that the tapeworms have primacy.

44 posted on 04/22/2003 3:26:04 PM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: Caleb1411
The spokesman called on local officials to drop one of the two murder charges against Mr. Peterson on the grounds that the late-term fetus his wife carried was not a person.


"You've got to be kidding"

46 posted on 04/22/2003 4:14:30 PM PDT by NYer (Easter Blessings to all! Christe Eleison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caleb1411
What an idiot bump!
47 posted on 04/22/2003 5:34:43 PM PDT by HighRoadToChina (Never Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caleb1411
Enough to make anyone vomit. They always defend murdering rapists... such a pitiful downtrodden organization of fake leftist lesbians.
48 posted on 04/22/2003 5:38:53 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Great post and picture of a great woman.
49 posted on 04/22/2003 9:56:40 PM PDT by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: dd5339
NOW makes me ill!
50 posted on 04/23/2003 6:34:09 AM PDT by Vic3O3 (Jeremiah 31:16-17 (KJV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Well, when a woman's parents name her "Mavra Stark" she's bound to grow up angry.

How about "Mavis Leno?"

51 posted on 04/23/2003 1:27:31 PM PDT by pollwatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: surelyclintonsbaddream
Is the tapeworm on the endangered species list?

Where's PETA on her remarks?
52 posted on 04/23/2003 7:00:56 PM PDT by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson