1 posted on
04/25/2003 7:40:41 AM PDT by
ex-Texan
To: ex-Texan
Time to go rent the movie "Outbreak" with Kevin Spacey and Dustin Hoffman and Cuba Gooding, Jr. Get a little taste of what is going down in the Middle Kingdom over Sarsmania.
2 posted on
04/25/2003 7:49:20 AM PDT by
AmericanInTokyo
(Kim Jong Il had ANOTHER bad underwear day . He found "decapitate" in his English-Korean dictionary.)
To: ex-Texan
Sars and rumors of Sars
3 posted on
04/25/2003 7:53:40 AM PDT by
week 71
To: ex-Texan
I don't think we have a clue about how many cases are in rural China. A vast disaster in the making, I think. India is also ripe for being hit hard as are Africa (as usual) and South America. In short, a disaster for the overpopulated countries who outbreed their ability to provide any decent medical care for themselves.
To: ex-Texan
OK...from all the thread about SARS, and upon researching this myself...I can only come up with the following conclusions (speculative of course):
1) The U.S. health care system can deal with, and treat Americans who come down with this disease effectively with minimal loss of life
2) Asian people seem to be less immune from this disease than Americans; more Asians are catching it and dying from it. This may have to do with the quality of health care or immune differences across races OR a combination of both (its a stretch I know)
3) China has "accidently" created and proliforated this virus as a means of subtle population control.
14 posted on
04/25/2003 8:23:22 AM PDT by
BureaucratusMaximus
(if we're not going to act like a constitutional republic...lets be the best empire we can be...)
To: ex-Texan
27 posted on
04/25/2003 9:19:40 AM PDT by
_Jim
(Guangdong doctor linked to SARS: http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030320/09/)
To: ex-Texan
4,000 people 'quarantined' for SUSPECTED SARS, a virus which has no higher a death rate than other forms of Asian flu. A lot LOWER in some cases.
I rarely ever go into even remotely tinfoil hat mode so I oughtta have earned ONE tinfoil hat theory....
Does anyone besides me get the feeling China is using the UNinspired media hysteria-hyping to round up political dissidents, who will then conveniently die of SARS? They don't all even have to be dissidents. I see a perfect way for good comrades to kill off competition.
Murdering dissidents under cover of the manufactured SARS scare will protect China from - in this instance - further accusations of crimes against humanity.
35 posted on
04/25/2003 10:49:58 AM PDT by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: ex-Texan
I am more worried about a deadly outbreak of FUDS in North America than I am about SARS.
Get a grip, the health system in the US is more than just a teensy bit better than that in China.
Note to Hitlery Clinton: CHINA has nationalized "single payer" health care, we don't.
36 posted on
04/25/2003 10:52:21 AM PDT by
adam_az
To: ex-Texan
Why are they putting college students in a military training camp? Why aren't they being isolated in their dorms, or inside a local hospital?
To: ex-Texan
To: ex-Texan
GOD FORBID WE DEFEND OUR BORDERS AGAINST NEW AND DEADLY DISEASES...WE MIGHT OFFEND SOMEONE.
To: ex-Texan; Smogger; Diogenesis; cake_crumb; LurkingSince'98; Rain-maker; aristeides; Mitchell
My analysis says the SARS death rate is much higher than widely reported.
I believe the various areas differ for two main reasons:
- Some areas have better/worse treatement and life-support facilities.
- Some countries choose to report only their more SERIOUS cases as SARS.
SARS Mortality Rates Based on World Health Organization data (Revised: 4/27am) |
Area |
Recoveries to date |
Deaths to date |
Recent** Death Rate |
|
Active Cases still in Danger |
Projected Future Deaths |
Projected Final Mortality |
Hong Kong |
632 |
121 |
12.9% |
|
774 |
100 |
14.5% |
Singapore |
126 |
21 |
16.1% |
|
51 |
8 |
14.8% |
China |
1285 |
122 |
28.2% |
|
1346 |
380 |
18.2% |
Canada |
77 |
18 |
20.7% |
|
47 |
10 |
19.5% |
World-wide |
2239 |
293 |
18.5% |
|
2304 |
426 |
14.9% |
** ( Deaths in the last 7 days) / ( Deaths + Recoveries in the last 7 days) |
Trend - Active Cases Still in Danger |
Date |
Hong Kong |
Singapore |
China |
Canada |
World-wide |
Apr 19 |
914 |
61 |
307 |
66 |
1616 |
Apr 20 |
893 |
64 |
497 |
66 |
1694 |
Apr 21 (est.) |
872 |
66 |
686 |
66 |
1771 |
Apr 22 |
874 |
60 |
708 |
61 |
1783 |
Apr 23 |
831 |
58 |
968 |
58 |
2005 |
Apr 24 |
812 |
55 |
1058 |
58 |
2059 |
Apr 25 |
781 |
50 |
1209 |
51 |
2169 |
Apr 26 |
774 |
51 |
1346 |
47 |
2304 |
(includes new daily cases... excludes cases resolved by death or recovery) |
My observations:
- Hong Kong 'might' be getting a handle on their problem.
- It's average new cases per day is smaller than cases resolved per day.
- It apparently has the best treatment rate.
- Singapore and Canada MAY be the close to controlling their active caseloads:
- Canada's higher death rate MAY be because more patients truly had SARS,
instead of something else like flu. - OR MAYBE Canada has poorer healthcare
- OR MAYBE Canada is ONLY reporting it's more-severe cases.
- China appears to be terribly out of control by every measure.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson