Skip to comments.
Idiot Senate Republicans Botching Tax Cut
Rush Limbaugh ^
| April 29, 2003
| Rush Limbaugh
Posted on 04/29/2003 3:24:44 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
Idiot Senate Republicans Botching Tax Cut
April 29, 2003
Why did President Bush and all of us work so hard to win back our legitimate majority in the upper house of Congress last year, if our GOP senators aren't going to fight for us? Why did we get out and vote if they're going to cave on an issue as important as reducing the one-in-three days the average American works as a slave to the government taxman? Listen for my shot at an answer to this income tax relief quagmire in the audio link below.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) somehow forgot to inform Speaker of the House Denny Hastert (R-IL) that the allegedly GOP-controlled Senate had caved on tax relief. Bush wanted $726 billion in tax relief, but Frist went along with these so-called moderate Republicans for a $350 billion cut. Now, in Democratic lingo, any amount you propose for something below the highest figure is a "cut." So the Republican Senate has just decided to cut your tax relief - raise your taxes - by $376 billion! That's over $1,000 per American.
Why do these Republican senators - as they did in 2000 by sharing power only to get screwed by the Jeffords/Daschle flip - care more about getting along with the guys on the other isle than serving their constituents? The original conventional wisdom predicted the president getting the entire $726 billion tax relief package for America. Senator Grassley (R-IO) was confident. But then the moderate Republicans in the Senate led by Olympia Snowe (R-ME), George Voinovich (R-OH) and Lincoln Chafee (R-RI) decided to go AWOL.
Now we have to "target" Snowe and Voinovich for conversion on tax cuts! If you need convincing on the fact that tax cuts spur economic growth, you're not a Republican. Meanwhile Congressman Bill Thomas (R-CA), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, is threatening to ditch all of this and come up with his own program. He wants to play hardball because he's mad at the Bush administration over some perceived slight. This is sheer political idiocy - especially when we have a president with a 75% approval rating. We trusted him on the war; he was right and the other guys were wrong. Trust him on this, too.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: axixofevil; botching; bushtaxcuts; francorepublicans; republicans; rushlimbaugh; senate; taxcut; taxreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
1
posted on
04/29/2003 3:24:44 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
To: TLBSHOW
An important lesson for every Freeper: When it comes to voting for a RINO, or voting for a Democrat, VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRAT!
It doesn't do any good to make a Republican government if you don't first make good Republicans.
To: TLBSHOW
only to get screwed by the Jeffords/Daschle flip - care more about getting along with the guys on the other isle than serving their constituents? The original conventional wisdom predicted the president getting the entire $726 billion tax relief package for America. Senator Grassley (R-IO) was confident. But then the moderate Republicans in the Senate led by Olympia Snowe (R-ME), George Voinovich (R-OH) and Lincoln Chafee (R-RI) decided to go AWOL.
Now we have to "target" Snowe and Voinovich for conversion on tax cuts! If you need convincing on the fact that tax cuts spur economic growth, you're not a Republican. Meanwhile Congressman Bill Thomas (R-CA), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, is threatening to ditch all of this and come up with his own program. He wants to play hardball because he's mad at the Bush administration over some perceived slight. This is sheer political idiocy
Well done, Todd.
3
posted on
04/29/2003 3:35:36 PM PDT
by
annyokie
To: TLBSHOW
Extreme Diddo's to Rush. Really makes you think about the Dem's in sheeps clothing.
4
posted on
04/29/2003 3:36:44 PM PDT
by
bgierhart
To: sackofcatfood
A better policy is to vote RINO ONLY when the district is more liberal than conservative. NR had an article which said it much better than I about how much Connie Morella sucked but conservatives should vote for her due to her district's liberalism but why voting for a Issakson in GA was plain dumb.
5
posted on
04/29/2003 3:37:29 PM PDT
by
KantianBurke
(The Federal govt should be protecting us from terrorists, not handing out goodies)
To: TLBSHOW
That stupid Lott, the wussie needs to go. Time to elect a SML with fire in his belly. One that knows how to grease thru the legislation with a republican majority.
6
posted on
04/29/2003 3:37:36 PM PDT
by
cynicom
To: KantianBurke
I don't understand why conservatives can't accept what you just wrote...ie insisting on a hardcore conservative in NYC will only get you a liberal elected. Take a Rudy, and you won't get a liberal...Flame away freepers.
7
posted on
04/29/2003 3:42:24 PM PDT
by
votelife
(FREE MIGUEL ESTRADA!)
To: cynicom
That stupid Lott, the wussie needs to go. Time to elect a SML with fire in his belly. There there!! Put down the keyboard and nobody will get hurt. Put it down and back away from the computer.
To: cynicom
That stupid Lott, the wussie needs to go. Time to elect a SML with fire in his belly. Let's get rid of the other SML Bill Frist too. /sarcasm
9
posted on
04/29/2003 4:18:52 PM PDT
by
kcordell
To: kcordell
Well, they told me that if Frist was made SML, that the Senate would snap to attention and that bills would flood thru, same as with the judge nominations.
Well, nothing has been done, so it has to be Lotts fault.
10
posted on
04/29/2003 4:21:42 PM PDT
by
cynicom
To: cynicom
Well, nothing has been done, so it has to be Lotts fault. I gotcha. Makes perfect sense. Darn him!
11
posted on
04/29/2003 4:30:03 PM PDT
by
kcordell
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: TLBSHOW
Most likely this tax cut fiasco is going according to the administrations's plan. The president's record on tax cuts is poor in terms of economic stimulus going back to his days as Texas governor. Tax cuts are being used solely to score political points with the base. And there's much more to economic stimulus than tax cuts as Reagan showed.
To: TLBSHOW
Snowe, Voinovich, and Chaffee do not deserve to be called Republicans. They're RATS holding an "R" behind their name.
To: kcordell
Let's get rid of the other SML Bill Frist too.No, you have it all wrong. Elected Snowe to SML too and we can have troika of useless idiots.
15
posted on
04/29/2003 4:41:30 PM PDT
by
putupon
(I smack Chirac ,and Schroeder too, with my stepped in dog squeeze shoe.)
To: *Taxreform
To: TLBSHOW
Saw Voinovich on Meet the Press this past Sunday. He defended his 350 billion and no more tax cut. Must say he made sense since we are no longer running a surplus. Heck a real weasal democrat in his place would indeed be asking for a tax increase right now.
17
posted on
04/29/2003 4:46:07 PM PDT
by
eternity
(From here to...)
To: lilylangtree
In New England, Chaffee and Snow are as conservative as you can get and still have a chance of being elected. Remember, this is an area of the country in which Republicans never, ever, mention their party affiliation.
It makes me sick to have to say it, but with them we have a cowardly Republican majority. Without them we have a powerless, conservative minority.
To: eternity
Have to agree with your comments.
To: Anarchist
What a deal!
20
posted on
04/29/2003 5:14:42 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
(the gift is to see the truth)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson