Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democratic Elected Officials Say:Put LaRouche in ABC-TV Debate
EIR ^ | April 29, 2003 | EIR

Posted on 04/29/2003 9:31:21 PM PDT by Nachum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Rodney King; Nachum; sgaspar
Easy.

The dems want this kookburger up there so they can identify him with the Right. Many Liberals equate LaRouche with right-wing fanaticism.

As soon as the "Deate" is over, they can use him against the Republicans.

21 posted on 04/30/2003 6:19:18 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
"Right-Winger?" Didn't LaRouche also head the radical SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) in the '60's? His leadership and organization is best described as a "Political Cult."
22 posted on 04/30/2003 6:47:19 AM PDT by pollwatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
LaRouche has some good ideas for a complete raving nutter. He comes off as an ultra conservative and he is/was a staunch liberatarian when I briefly followed him in the early 80's.

His participation will paint conservatives as lunatics. That is why they want his mug and mouth.

The man has a few roo's loose in he's upper paddock if you know what I mean.

23 posted on 04/30/2003 7:23:34 AM PDT by blackdog (Peace, love, and understanding.....$10 bucks a hit in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
As soon as the "Deate" is over, they can use him against the Republicans.

But he's a Democrat; the debate is billed as a Democrat debate; and he'll be bashing Bush (only in extremis) the same way Kerry and Edwards will.

The idiot fringe of the Democrat party might want him, but the candidates don't want LaRouche to end up in a GOP commercial profiling "presidential candidates."

24 posted on 04/30/2003 7:36:25 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
The Dems used to have a president who SHOULD have been a convicted felon, now they are pushing a guy who IS a convicted felon.
25 posted on 04/30/2003 7:50:20 AM PDT by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
The feds convicting LaRouche over campaign and his organization's financial practices sort of presents a certain definition of hypocracy and irony though, you'd have to admit.....

If the same financial laws applied to LaRouche were applied to the entire body politic, congress would have to change it's start time to coincide with yard exercise at Allenwood.

I am certainly no LaRouche fan, but the guy certainly has an equal protection argument.

26 posted on 04/30/2003 8:01:38 AM PDT by blackdog (Peace, love, and understanding.....$10 bucks a hit in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Why would anyone want that psycho to particpate?

Dunno about anybody else, but I would love to have LaRouche and Sharpton each on TV for an hour with big Democratic Party banners clearly visible on the lecterns in front of them and the wall behind them.

27 posted on 04/30/2003 8:42:23 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
They are trying to create a new Perot. Let's counter with requests to include Al Sharpton.
28 posted on 04/30/2003 8:44:09 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
No congresscritter that I know of has ever solicited money for a magazine subscription to "Fusion" for about $35 a year and then after they got your credit card number, they then charged you for a subscription to "Executive Intelligence Review" for $400 a year without your approval.

That's what LaRouche did to my parents and THOUSANDS of other people, which is why he went to jail.






29 posted on 04/30/2003 8:47:10 AM PDT by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pollwatcher
LaRouche is a leftie big time. Yes, he was for SDI, but he's defeinitely a socialist. Look at his writings.

I have a magazine of his from the late 70's or early 80's - it is full of articles on Marxism- Leninism. I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP.
30 posted on 04/30/2003 8:49:07 AM PDT by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
Implosion!
31 posted on 04/30/2003 9:00:45 AM PDT by ClaireSolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
You forgot John Wayne Gacy (a local democrat hot-shot from Chicago) who was executed for the murder of 33 people.
32 posted on 04/30/2003 9:02:01 AM PDT by PetroniDE (Get Well Soon Dix !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
The Dems are wackos. Once Lyndon LaRouche was a fringe extremist; now he's right at home in the Democratic Party. He should join the debate if only so viewers can see next month just how spaced out the Democrats are. The Jackass of the 21st Century.
33 posted on 04/30/2003 9:04:17 AM PDT by goldstategop ( In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
I subscribed to his newspaper(weekly thing that quoted Jefferson in it's title). I used to read it after long drug induced awake periods of many days. His reports of his physisists conquering fusion and his geometrical arguments governing circumstance were exactly what my head needed to divert my attention from pruning the trees in my yard at 2:00am.

I was too poor to have credit back then, and I paid with my subscription by check. I guess I didn't need "Executive Intelligence" to not give him access to additional spending of my money. Good, my bad.

I ran out of stuff to do around the house and it seemed that every time an amphetemine induced brilliant job that needed to be done like splitting stone at dawn, grafting trees at midnight, or building more bee hive sections in December only caused me to ache for a week. Much like giving up amphetemines was a good thing, so was the passing of my interest in LaRouche.

The early 80's were a strange time.

34 posted on 04/30/2003 9:52:15 AM PDT by blackdog (Peace, love, and understanding.....$10 bucks a hit in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
LOLOL!!!!!!

You are a genius!!!

Imagine where LaRouche would be now if he'd stayed out of jail? By the way, it was the evil Reagan/Bush admin that stuck him in jail - he has a vendetta against the Bushes. --- kind of like Perot's vendetta but much more sinister.
35 posted on 04/30/2003 9:56:02 AM PDT by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
One universal lesson can be learned by the Larouche scenario. It's much like Leona Helmsley and the IRS......

You don't gnaw at the nerves of those who can swing the sword. His messing around with Maggie was what caught up with him. Had he not made those "Margret Thatcher is a drug dealer" comments I think he'd of skated.

That "only the little people pay taxes" line by Leona was a real dose of salt on the IRS's papercut too. It's really curious, that process of showing up on the prosecutorial radar of the feds. Larry Flint will join them soon with his quest for nude Bush daughter photo's for $4,000,000. I'd say that bought him his own personal radar transponder.

36 posted on 04/30/2003 10:11:36 AM PDT by blackdog (Peace, love, and understanding.....$10 bucks a hit in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson