Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democratic Elected Officials Say:Put LaRouche in ABC-TV Debate
EIR ^ | April 29, 2003 | EIR

Posted on 04/29/2003 9:31:21 PM PDT by Nachum

PRESS RELEASE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

April 29, 2003
Democratic Elected Officials Say:
Put LaRouche in ABC-TV Debate
South Carolina media reported on April 29 that the state's Democratic Party chairman had received a letter from nearly 40 current and former Democratic elected officials asking that Presidential pre-candidate Lyndon LaRouche be invited to the May 3 Presidential debate to be broadcast nationally by ABC-TV. At a press conference held by the representatives on April 28, Florence, S.C. City Councilman Edward Robinson released the letter, which had been sent to state chairman Richard Harpootlian on April 12. In it, the Democratic leaders—roughly half from South Carolina and the other half from other states, joined by former Surgeon-General Joycelyn Elders—pointed out that LaRouche now has more contributors to his Presidential campaign than any of the nine Democratic candidates invited to the debate, from which the Party is seeking to exclude him.

"It's outrageous. It's stupid" that LaRouche has not been invited, campaign spokesman Dr. Debra Freeman was quoted in a statewide AP wire. "The Democratic Party in the State of South Carolina has long been under the influence of Don Fowler," she said, adding the campaign did not plan legal action. "We will continue doing what we have been doing, and take the campaign directly to the people."

OPEN LETTER TO SOUTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY

April 28, 2003

The following letter was released today at a press conference held in Florence, S.C. by Florence City Councilman Edward Robinson.

April 12, 2003

Chairman Richard Harpootlian
South Carolina Democratic Party
1517 Blanding St.
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

Dear Sirs:

It has been brought to our attention that on May 1-3, you are hosting the annual Democratic Party State Convention and Jefferson-Jackson Day events. As part of that weekend, you are also sponsoring a forum for candidates seeking the Democratic Party nomination for President.

We call upon you to extend an invitation to Mr. Lyndon LaRouche to participate in the upcoming candidates' forum. Mr. LaRouche is a registered Democratic Party candidate, filed with the Federal Election Commission, has raised well over $3 million for the upcoming primaries, and qualified for Federal Matching Funds in the last several election campaigns on the Democratic side. According to the FEC, he now ranks fourth in total contributions raised and first in total contributors, among all major Democratic candidates.

Mr. LaRouche is an outspoken opponent of the policies of Donald Rumsfeld and Vice-President Cheney, and a proponent of policies like those of former President Franklin Roosevelt. Like FDR, Mr. LaRouche proposes to rebuild our nation's deteriorating economy. He has been spending significant sums of money on a radio campaign in Washington, D.C., and has been delivering speeches throughout the nation.

The attempt to limit the nominating process to an agreed-upon number of candidates, as designated by the news media and a handful of people in the national party, is discriminatory. Now is the time for fair and open debate on the critical issues facing our nation and our party. We urge you to extend an invitation to Mr. LaRouche to participate in the upcoming party weekend and candidate debate.

You can contact Mr. LaRouche's representatives in the Washington, D.C. area by calling Stuart Rosenblatt at 1-800-929-7566.

Sincerely, SOUTH CAROLINA SIGNERS:

Sen. Theo W. Mitchell, 1990 Democratic Party nominee for Governor, Greenville SC

Sen. Maggie Wallace Glover, Florence SC

Sen. Robert Ford, Charleston, SC

Rep. Leon Howard, Columbia SC

Rep. Walter Lloyd, Walterboro, SC

Rep. Robert Brown, Hollywood, SC

Rep. Seth Whipper, Charleston, SC

Rep. Brenda Lee, Spartanburg, SC

Rep. Joseph Neal, Columbia, SC

Edward Robinson, Florence City Council, Florence, SC

James Frazier, Horry Co. Commissioner, Conway, SC

James Lewis, Charleston City Council, Charleston, SC

Robert Mitchell, former City Councilman, Charleston, SC

William Nimmons, SC Democratic Party Executive Committee, Olar SC

Mrs. Willie Nimmons, Pres. Democratic Womens's Council, Olar SC

Marvin Stevenson, SC Democratic Party Executive Committee, Marion SC

Buquilla Ervin, Democratic Party activist, Florence, SC

Leon Harden, SC Democratic Executive Committee, Allendale, SC

Donna Lackey, SC Democratic Executive Committee, and President McCormick Co. Chamber of Commerce, Modoc, SC

Michael Johnson, Business Mgr, Intl Brotherhood of Boilermakers Loc 687, Charleston, SC

NATIONAL SIGNERS

Hon. Joycelyn Elders, Former United States Surgeon General, Little Rock, Ar

Sen. Joe Neal, Democratic Nominee for Governor of Nevada in 2002, Las Vegas, NV

Sen. Carlos Cisneros, Questo, New Mexico

Rep. Jan Judy, Fayetteville, Ar

Rep. Edward Dugay, Cherryfield, Me.

Rep. Albion Goodwin, Pembroke, Me.

Rep. Barbara Boyd, Anniston, Al.

Rep. Michael Obuchowski, Bellows Falls, Vt.

Rep. David Gibbs, West Point, Ms.

Rep. Benjamin Swan, Springfield, Ma.

Rep. Esther Haywood, St. Louis, Mo.

Rep. Harold James, Philadelphia, Pa.

Rep. Christine Sinicki, Milwaukee, Wi.

Rep. Barbara Richardson, Richmond, NH

Sue Daniel, Delegate to the Democratic Convention 2000, Frankston, Tx.

Barbara Lett Simmons, Democratic National Committeewoman, Washington, DC

Stuart Rosenblatt, LaRouche in 2004


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: abctvdebate; britain; democratic; electionpresident; larouche; lyndonlarouche; officials; say
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Hon. Joycelyn Elders, Former United States Surgeon General, Little Rock, Ar

Oh, well that makes it all better...

1 posted on 04/29/2003 9:31:22 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Weird, what is the angle here? Why would anyone want that psycho to particpate?
2 posted on 04/29/2003 9:32:18 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
He might as well go in the debate, he's not that much kookier than Al Sharpton or Dennis Kucinich.
3 posted on 04/29/2003 9:35:41 PM PDT by sgaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
"Queen Elizabeth is dealing drugs out of Buckingham Palace, the U.S. economy will certainly collapse in 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1908 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004, and Howard Hughes killed John Lennon!" (- Fringe Democratic Party talking points)
4 posted on 04/29/2003 9:40:19 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
They (the demo's) must have polling data/focus group data that shows MOST people over there think LaRouche:

IS a republican/

Sounds like he SHOULD BE a republican/

Sounds like he COULD BE a republican/

MUST BE a republican because he is a crazy white male/

COULD BE linked to republicans/

COULD be linked in campaign radio ads TO BE a white republican.

....................

Hey, they're playing to ignorant democratic (scared)voters ..... ANY lie is good enough that can be used to hurt republicans.

And their press won't EVER correct the demo's lies.

5 posted on 04/29/2003 9:43:26 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I support FR monthly; and ABBCNNBCBS (continue to) Lie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Weird, what is the angle here? Why would anyone want that psycho to particpate?

Well, we certainly would like him to participate. I don't know about the RATS. My guess is every one of those signers is either one of his usual hangers-on; a debate absolutist that believes anyone registered should be allowed on stage even if that meant there were 600 people and the debate went on for 12 days; or simply a know-nothing who was asked to sign a petition that really doesn't ask for much so they did.

6 posted on 04/29/2003 9:46:35 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Rodney King
Why would anyone want that psycho to particpate?

It's a trick to make Al Sharpton seem a respectable
candidate in comparison to La Rouche.  It is all
a Republican ploy (orchestrated, as La Rouche will
tell you, by the Queen of England) to make sure
Sharpton stays in the race long enough to drive off
 any Democrat capable of being elected.
8 posted on 04/29/2003 9:59:17 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Exactly. If Joycelyn Elders is on board, who in their right mind could be against it?

Or I have a better idea. Why not let Joycelyn join the debate herself? She can be Reverend Al's running mate.

9 posted on 04/29/2003 10:08:43 PM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
They obviously need someone to make them look attractive by contrast. Why stop with Larouche? Isn't Charles Manson due for parole soon?
10 posted on 04/29/2003 10:25:34 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Open the pod bay door HAL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

Manson-Dahmer 2004
Democrats fighting for your right to be you!

11 posted on 04/29/2003 10:33:41 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
LaRouche Exposed -

http://www.pcc-courieronline.com/news/111501/larouche.html

"the last time the organization recruited heavily was between 1967 through 1974 ... They need to recruit [again]"

12 posted on 04/29/2003 10:39:02 PM PDT by _Jim (Guangdong doctor linked as source of SARS in China: http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030320/09/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
To make the other commiecrat sumbitchs look more moderate? Yep, Monica
13 posted on 04/29/2003 10:49:32 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Election President
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
14 posted on 04/29/2003 11:06:05 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
"Queen Elizabeth is dealing drugs out of Buckingham Palace, the U.S. economy will certainly collapse in 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004, and Howard Hughes killed John Lennon!" (- Fringe Democratic Party talking points)

And we have to go back to the gold standard, too.

Seriously...I first saw LaRouche in a paid political announcement in 1980, when the so-called Fairness Doctrine forced the networks sell primetime to any candidate who came up with the cash. The dude was sweating like a pig, and breathlessly explaining why neither Ford nor Carter was going to be able to pull the nation out of its economic funk. Then he would go on about how either candidate would continue this beyond elaborate global plot formulated by Bertrand Russell, H.G. Wells, Aleister Crowley (yes, the same guy from the Ozzy song) and Robert Hutchins, former President of the University of Chicago.

He's still at it. Get a load of this:


Predominant control over the present Bush Administration has been secured, until now, by a Cheney-led fusion of the combination of Chicago University's imported fascist—that Professor Leo Strauss—with Wells' and Russell's goal of world government through Hitler-like, preventive nuclear war. Speaking in terms of epistemology, the "genetically" Nazi-like ideology of a Strauss, was that of a figure whose own writings, like those of his underling Allan Bloom, recall those of the Nazi philosopher, Martin Heidegger, who influenced Strauss. Strauss's dogmas are those of a Nietzschean parody of the wicked Thrasymachus from Plato's Republic. That same Strauss is the central ideological figure of that cult of his devotees known as the current Bush Administration's "Chicken-hawks." It is these Chicken-hawks who, in Donald Rumsfeld's Hitler-and-the-generals routines, have been the controlling, lackey-like figures of President Bush's post-2001 drive toward imperial, nuclear-weapons-wielding world war.

This is in a press release referring to Rumsfeld, Cheney, Bush and Ashcroft as "Children of Satan."

The guy must have a lit degree or something, because he states his opinions about all of his opponents by comparing them to historical figures (needless to say, every Nazi you can think of) or fictional characters (Cheney is "Svengali, " George W. Bush is "Trilby").

I used to be entertained by LaRouche. Now, I pity him and ignore him.

15 posted on 04/30/2003 12:40:47 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GOPcapitalist
Or I have a better idea. Why not let Joycelyn join the debate herself? She can be Reverend Al's running mate.

That makes perfect sense. Al's a jerk, and we know she's an advocate of jerking.

16 posted on 04/30/2003 12:44:44 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
Darn! I meant 1976.
17 posted on 04/30/2003 12:46:56 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
WHOA.
18 posted on 04/30/2003 1:06:12 AM PDT by Boo-ba-loo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
Al's a jerk, and we know she's an advocate of jerking.

LOL

.

19 posted on 04/30/2003 1:09:37 AM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GOPcapitalist
GOPcapitalist suggests:   "Why not let Joycelyn join the debate herself? She can be Reverend Al's running mate."

Or perhaps Joycelyn would prefer being his "hand maiden".

--Boot Hill

20 posted on 04/30/2003 1:31:30 AM PDT by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson