Posted on 04/30/2003 10:21:53 PM PDT by Ooh-Ah
Not a problem, my friend. Once we boot the locals, my fellow co-conspirators will get the standard Zionist discount - I can't promise Boca, but I've got this nice little place in South Beach that's yours if you want it. Just send the secret passphrase to me via ZionMail, and we'll set you up nice...
Winston Churchill is recorded as naming one certain King of England as the greatest....this King however..exploited the Jews..by court advice.
So he drew them out from their hidden lifestyle..and encouraged their money openly in ventures with the King....later...the King did not repay the loans given he for his ventures...his solution/or advice from court..was to boot the Jews out of England....which he did.
This King plays this game again at a later period of his reign...again..luring Jewish money into the Kings court...faking his allegence ..faking his promise to repay loans...which he did again..as he booted the Jews out.
Nothing shocking when its "Those Jews...or...we did'nt do anything to them theme"..coming from England...they are as messed as the French and Germans that way.
The Jewish side of our family hailed from the Manchester region of England..and it was..stay..run come back..run..comeback... run.
Not if you convert like you're supposed to ;)
I see he has left his deluxe accomodations in Portugal and is back in London.
Did he spell out "Zionists"?
he said prominent "zionist" figures were behind the cash from Saddam allegations.
Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz. Pat Buchanan warned us about these guys. Guess we should have listened.
Yes, I am sure he has. I just had a senior moment, and forgot. I have seen this clown Galloway's name for a couple weeks now.
Yesterday I paid our little friends at "Original Dissent" a visit (you know, the dishonest liars who claimed here they weren't anti-Semites while admitting there that they were?). And I found some interesting things.
"Communism," per se, isn't bad any more. It was bad when it was "invented" and "used" by the Jews (these people seem to think that Leon Trotsky was David HaMelekh), but the minute they lost their "control" and Stalin turned it into "national bolshevism" it suddenly became good. So not only is only "Jewish" Communism subversive while non-Jewish Communism is not, but Jewish anti-Communism is also subversive! Do you find such admissions by people who claim the Jews "forced" them to hate them by being "Communists" to be funny? They are openly admitting they are dishonest liars. So much for "aryan" honor.
So now "Stalinism," as opposed to "Trotskyism" (you know, the genuine Communism of Moses) is good. This means that while just a short while ago these people were claiming that Stalin, North Korea, Cuba, etc., were secretly ruled by Israel, these people can now switch 180 degrees and defend them from subversive Jewish anti-Communists because they are "national bolsheviks!"
But there's more. It seems that the Jews have lost "control" of "their" Left and it has now fallen into the hands of "people who don't care for them" (Arabs and their Third World allies). Just as the "true Right" isn't against Communism per se, so it isn't even against leftism per se, as long as it is being carried out or advocated by enemies of the Jews. And this from people who claimed just the day before yesterday that they hated the Jews because the Jews were leftists! Now when anti-Semites become leftists (or vice versa) that old cause-effect doesn't work any more! Why don't they just put on villain outfits and say, "look at us, we're evil liars who never meant a single excuse we ever gave because we're Satan incarnate! BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!!!!!"
But there's more! These people also used to claim that they hated the Jews because the Jews were "race-mixers!" Well now guess what! Ramsey Clark, "race-mixer" par excellence, is now their hero because he hates Israel! Now I may not be a professional logician, but if these people truly hated Jews because they are "race-mixers," wouldn't they hate Ramsey Clark as well? Why don't they go into professional wrestling as "heels" with devil horns on???
And there's still more!!! It turns out that these people hate the Jews "because" the Jews "supported the Albanians against the Serbs" (a gross generalization that never applied to the extreme religio-nationalist Right Zionists, btw). Who are the Albanians? They are--horrors!--MOSLEMS defiling the heart of chr*stian Europe! Actually of course, the Albanians are Indo-Europeans (the Illyrians) who under Turkish aegis converted from Eastern Orthodoxy to islam centuries ago. But get this . . . these Indo-European converts to islam (whom I oppose as I oppose all islam) are DEFILING "chr*stian europe" while these same "proud aryans" support the mass transfer of Semitic Arab moslems (complete with all the facial characteristics they claim "causes" them to hate Jews) to France, in fact changing the racial makeup of the country! Could it . . . might it be possible that the islam of the Albanians really has nothing to do with anything? Or perhaps these people will claim next that if the moslems in the Balkans were Semitic Arabs instead of Indo-European Albanians no good "aryan" would have a single objection? Will "honorable aryans" remain anti-Albanian when the Albanians join the anti-Israel crusade?
Why don't these deliberate, open villains slither on the ground? They certainly do enjoy flaunting their dishonesty!
Ah, but there's still more! As you know, the Jews have not always been leftists, or communists, or race-mixers, or Trotskyite anti-Stalinists. Perhaps before they were all these things (which "caused" the anti-Semites to hate them) they were all right? Not at all! Because even though they were none of these things--not one of them--in medieval Europe, they nevertheless "subverted" chr*stian civilization. How? By being "Talmudists." Before that they perpetrated animal sacrifices. In the later middle ages they were capitalists. Then they were all those other things, each one of which "subverted" civilization and "caused" the Jew-haters to hate them! And tomorrow a Jew will doubtless subvert chr*stian civilization by using the restroom or by brething or by going to work! In other words, the Jew-haters don't hate the Jews because of anything the Jews do or have ever done. They decide to hate the actions only because Jews do them. Could anything possibly be more "self-evident?" And these smirking maggots throw this blatant hypocrisy, these blatant lies, in our faces and laugh at us . . . and we're supposed to think it's FUNNY?????
Perhaps the new compound word "lyingshysteraryan" should be introduced to the dictionary. They enjoy their blatant hypocrisy so much I'm sure they would wallow in the infamy!
I'm sorry, folks, but I don't think they're funny at all. I don't want to laugh at them. I don't want to dismiss them. I don't want to shake my head and click my tongue. I don't want to do anything to them. But I sure wish Someone Else would, and I don't mean Abe Foxman or Elie Wiesel or Simon Wiesenthal or 'Avi Dershowitz either! I wish that the real object of their hatred, to Whom they offer the ultimate insult by ignoring Him, would split open the mirage of reality we live in, reveal His Awful G-dliness, and pour forth such fury upon them that they would suffer torments beyond anything Saddam Hussein (y'sh"v) could ever dream in his most twisted nightmares. I want Him to force them to crawl on their knees, drop the nonsense about noses and bankers, and admit that it was HE Whom they really hated all along. I want the blatant, open, intentionally lying "aryan" tongues to say the Awful Name that no man may speak and break into flame as they say "HaShem is G-d! HaShem is G-d! HaShem is G-d!" for all eternity. That's what I want. As the subversive talmudist/capitalist/trotskyist/anti-Stalinist/race-mixing/ restroom-using Kahanists say, it is because there is no vengeance that men do not believe in G-d.
And these people, many of them atheists, have the gall to claim to be the "ultimate anti-Communists" (even though Communism isn't bad any more). When FR was created they came here and claimed it as their territory (this place swarmed with the vermin until their buddies committed mass murder on 9/11). Anytime any website, forum, web ring, magazine, or anything so much as uses the terms "conservative" or "anti-Communist" they think they have the right to take it over. These miserable materialist fans of Madelyn Murray O'Hair actually think they have those terms legally copyrighted and can sue anyone else who uses them!
I am going to say it one more time. I know that I am a misfit here at FR, and I accept that. I can be banned at any time by JR, and I accept that because this is his site and I'm just a guest. I know I must try his patience terribly sometimes. But nevertheless, I'm going to say this one more time: the essential error of Communism is not that it is "big government" or "progressive" or cruel or anything else--it is that it is a non-Theistically based value system. Anyone else with a non-Theistically based value system--regardless of how "small government" or "traditionalist" it may be, is in essence no different. Nor are atheist Jewish liberals essentially any different from the atheist Nazis who hate them. The problem is not people who "hate" or who "subvert." The problem is people who think that any objective moral vision can exist in the absence of G-d. That is why my by-line is the provocative "G-d's laws or NONE!!!" I don't have that there to intentionally offend anyone or seem like a crank. I have that there because that is what I believe, and if I even allowed anyone to have the impression that I subscribe to a non-Theistic moral system, however "benign" it might be, I would be no better than Dershowitz or Stalin or Revilo P. Oliver or the folks at OD. I say that because I am compelled to.
My last plea is to the Jews here on FR. I have never said this, but I know that I must embarrass you at times. For me we are still living in the days of Yehoshu`a Bin Nun and I do not understand the awful silence about G-d (outside the minyan), the appeals to "religious freedom" or "tolerance" or to 18th Century rationalist deist Anglo-American freemasons. Those things are outside the experience of one living in the days of Yehoshu`a Bin Nun. I do not understand the stress on a purely ethnic self-defense, of a "'ahavat Yisra'el" that dismisses the issue of G-d and encompesses people who would in other circumstances be subject to cheirem or `ir haniddachat. The "Jew-haters" really do not hate your noses. They hate HaShem, and they prove this by their awful, spiteful, hate-filled silence, their utter ignoring of Him as though He did not exist, G-d forbid. If they want to "destroy" Him (chas vechalilah!) by silence, then it is because they are vermin. But why don't Jews mention him? Why doesn't Dershowitz mention him? Why don't Wiesel or Wiesenthal or Foxman? Why don't Torah Jews who are Theocrats within the minyan, mention G-d when marching against the worms such as are over at OD? Why is it always about "bigotry" or "prejudice" or "intolerance" or something? How many Jews subscribe to a non-Theistic value system? How many who do not nevertheless seem to do so?
If I have done nothing else I hope I have shown you that these people are not interested in your noses, your money, your accents, or anything else. They hate HaShem, not you, as deflating as they may be. Please I beg you, as a Noachide who has forsaken the beliefs and practices of a lifetime to cling to you, do what the vile, filthy, perverted vermin who oppose you will not.
I beg you . . . break the awful silence.
SAY HIS NAME!!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.