To: OutSpot
Let me get this straight: some lawyer for some fired FBI employees writes a letter claiming SHOCKING NEW EVIDENCE of McVeigh's innocence and you buy it?
There's a word for that behavior.
To: FreeTheHostages
If McVeigh was guilty, why should the FBI have to lie about factual evidence?
And even if he is guilty, I would easily support the death penalty for anyone who perjurers himself at a death-penalty trial. Otherwise, what's to keep the FBI from FIBbing at future trials? Justice is serious business, and lying under oath is a crime - especially when someone's life is at stake.
To: FreeTheHostages
"Let me get this straight: some lawyer for some fired FBI employees writes a letter claiming SHOCKING NEW EVIDENCE of McVeigh's innocence and you buy it? I nor the article insinuated that McVeigh was innocent. Next time please don't jump to conclusions.
I am just stating that due process in the case has been severly tainted. (hence - FBI star material witness giving misleading testemony, something that has not been uncommon in the FBI's history)
12 posted on
05/01/2003 7:57:16 AM PDT by
OutSpot
To: FreeTheHostages
Wasn't McVeigh executed on Clinton's Watch?
31 posted on
05/01/2003 8:15:22 AM PDT by
Redleg Duke
(Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
To: FreeTheHostages
Did you see that other gun go off in the grassy knoll?
Seriesly, McVeigh could not have acted on his own.
We may NEVER know the truth about who else was acting along with McVeigh - but from what I've seen it could have very well be Iraqi agents seeking retribution for Desert Storm on behalf of Saddam Hussein.
McVeigh was seen with Iraqis in Oklahoma City in the days just before the bombing.
Many, many theories, perhaps more info may miraculously surface to the top during our shakedown of Iraq (if Saddam sponsored the bobming).
55 posted on
05/01/2003 8:34:27 AM PDT by
Happy2BMe
(LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
To: FreeTheHostages
I don't think there are many people who doubt McVeigh's guilt. I think the real issue is wherher evidence was withheld from the jury that might have led them to make a different decision on whether McVeigh should be executed.
To: FreeTheHostages
and it ain't in the dictionary :)
73 posted on
05/01/2003 8:57:37 AM PDT by
Cosmo
(Liberalism is for girls)
To: FreeTheHostages
Well said. There's a whole lot of alleging going on. But, what are the facts? It seems some are jumping to conclusions already.
74 posted on
05/01/2003 8:59:50 AM PDT by
TheDon
( It is as difficult to provoke the United States as it is to survive its eventual and tardy response)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson