Posted on 05/02/2003 9:51:57 AM PDT by FairWitness
Every major campaign against AIDS in Africa has been based on the premise that heterosexual sex accounts for 90 percent of transmission in adults. Yet safe-sex efforts have not stopped the spread of the epidemic, which now affects 30 million people. Economic anthropologist David Gisselquist therefore suspected that HIV might be spread primarily by another route. After analyzing 20 years of epidemiological studies, he and his colleagues concluded that unsafe injections, blood transfusion, and other medical procedures may account for most AIDS transmission in African adults. Their analysis indicates that no more than 35 percent of HIV in that population is spread through sex.
Gisselquist's interest in AIDS was stimulated by the guidance he received while traveling through Africa as a World Bank consultant. "They give you a syringe and say, 'Carry this with you, and avoid all the health care that you can.' We've been paying for third-world health care while advising others to avoid it," he says. When he examined hundreds of papers on AIDS in Africa, he found evidence to back up those concerns. A study in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, for instance, found that 39 percent of HIV-positive, vaccinated infants had uninfected mothers. In contrast, Gisselquist could not uncover any clear data proving that sexual intercourse dominates the spread of African AIDS. In Zimbabwe, HIV incidence rose by 12 percent per year during the 1990s, even as sexually transmitted diseases sank by 25 percent overall and condom use rose among the high-risk groups. Gisselquist recently reported his findings in four papers published in the International Journal of STD & AIDS.
Medical researchers may have overemphasized sexual transmission of African AIDS in part because condom-use campaigns dovetail with their concerns about overpopulation, Gisselquist says. They also fear that people in Africa will lose faith in modern healthcare. Gisselquist urges new efforts to halt the spread of AIDS: "Aid programs need to push infection control in health care. And we need to give the public the advice and the tools for protecting themselves in medical situations," such as new syringes and single-dose vials.
Because I got a tax refund?
LOL, yes, how insensitive of you, wanting to keep your money, instead of giving it all to Uncle Sam, and the UN. (joking) Doesn't it remind you of what Rush said once, that God announces the world to end tomorrow. Some harder hit than others?
BTW, did you know that CDC had evidence in the early eighties that the HIV virus could be transmitted via pubic hair follicles, making infected female to uninfected male more likely? There were more than 100 HIV positive cases among military personnel in Germany who had acquired the virus from infected prostitutes and the only likely way of transmission was via pubic hair region (high vascular concentration close to skin surface) ... all other likely ways, such as infected needles, had been ruled out and the men wore a condom when 'using' the prostitutes.
If you disregard the propaganda from the CDC and the like, you will quickly find out that a lot of what is being diagnosed as "AIDS" in Africa really isn't. Several diseases are lumped together and called "AIDS". The diseases, which cause unstable immune systems, are symptons of AIDS. But many do not have full blown HIV/AIDS. I'm sure a few Freepers have links to good sites detailing this.James P. Hogan (the SF writer) has a website with a pretty good AIDS dissident section.
-Eric
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.