High Court Takes Case on Vincent Foster

Yahoo Politics ^ | 5-5-03 | GINA HOLLAND

[doug from upland]

THE REAL HILLARY CLINTON: Episode #29 - Filegate; Who Hired Craig Livingstone?

[StopGlobalWhining]

I spoke at length with Patrick Knowlton during the evening of Oct 31, 1998 at the FR reception at the Octagon in Washington following the "March for Justice". Alan Favish was also present and spoke to the gathering.

In my personal opinion, Patrick Knowlton is a rock solid honest American citizen. I believe every word he told me about what he witnessed at Ft Marcy Park, and the intimidation he has been subjected to by the "organs of state security" (Solzhenitzin speak).

Check out this web page: CAUGHT: A FALLING STARR by Alan Favish

[green team 1999]

thanks for the link

[doug from upland]

I had forgotten all about those turnaround trips.

[Happy2BMe]

Clinton's BIG DOMINO - The Rogues Gallery

Alamo Girl's Downside Legacy of The Clinton's

Beating, Threats, Killings, etc. of the Clinton Era

[Pagey]

Coincidentally, it was Craig Livingstone who "found" the keys to Foster's car in Foster's pocket at the morgue later that night, after records show that 2 different Park Police had searched his pockets at Fort Marcy Park and found nothing.

That is a fact. Re:Craig Livingstone---Webster Hubbell has stated that He was recommended by Hillary who was good friends with his Mom.Now the question should be who in the White House(Proper), said "...This guys O.K., we'll use him for security..." (???)Talk about another fall guy. That should be the question. No one can prove who hired him.(I bet you were joking by asking the question actually,weren't you?)When you bring your own people into the White House,w/out background checks and drug tests that never got taken, how can the question ever truly be answered?

[Pagey]

Thanks for a great Link BTW.

[firewalk]

bttt

[murdoog]

You can forget about that controversy. Mrs. Foster wasn't clear on which gun the FBI agents were asking her about. The gun at the park was blued. She thought they were asking her about a nickled one.

Actually she was very clear about which gun the agents were asking her about. If you look at her 302, you will see that the gun the FBI agents brought for her to identify was a nickled one. It wasn't just a case of her being confused.

[Shooter 2.5]

Read the interview.

She was discussing which gun Foster was supposed to have brought to Washington D.C.. She said she saw a nickeled pistol being packed into the suitcase. The FBI agents at that time didn't mention to her what gun was used.

I don't have a copy of that interview. I read the interview from the website that was insisting the "silver" gun turned into a "black" one. The webmaster didn't even read the evidence he had on his own website.

If you have a link to the interview, I would like to see it again.

[Samizdat]

What's with Olson? 5 government investigations? Oh Puhleez! There was one so called investigation. The others were just window dressing that simply reviewed the original whitewashed investigation. I have 2 questions Mr. Olson:

1. How did Foster manage to drive himself to the park without his car keys?

2. The so-called official investigation said that there were no fingerprints on the gun because it was a hot day and oh well, they just must have melted off. So my question is, if you buy that one, then how do you explain why one so called "unidentified" print remained under the grip? Why didn't that one melt off too? Hmmm?

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you so much for linking the DSL! Hugs!

[Alamo-Girl]

Sorry to be so late to the thread! Indeed, there has been a persistent rumor that Hillary and Vincent were involved.

[Spirited]

Thank you for a clear delineation on this issue.
Deeply appreciated.

[b4its2late]

Better late than never.....hill and vince go WAY back.... LOL.

[AJFavish]

I was initially perplexed by the Supreme Court's granting of the government's petition for certiorari while the other two petitions (mine and Lisa Foster Moody's) were put on "pending" status. I was concerned that this might mean that I was only going to be defending the Ninth Circuit's order that 4 of the 10 Polaroids be released and that the withholding of the other 6 Polaroids would not be considered by the Supreme Court.

However, I am now certain that all 10 Polaroids are at issue before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in case no. 02-954. This is the government's petition. However, by granting this petition, the Court will review all of the issues necessary to decide whether the OIC has the right to withhold any of the ten Polaroids that are the subject of the dispute. This is because Supreme Court Rule 14 (1) (a) states, in part: "The statement of any question presented is deemed to comprise every subsidiary question fairly included therein. Only the questions set out in the petition, or fairly included therein, will be considered by the Court." The government's statement of the question presented in its petition is: "Whether the Office of Independent Counsel properly withheld, under Exemption 7(C), photographs relating to the death of former Deputy White House Counsel Vincent Foster." This statement is broad enough to cover all of the issues that I raised in my petition as well as the issues raised in the other two petitions.

Regards,

Allan J. Favish
http://www.allanfavish.com

[Fred Mertz]

This sounds promising, Allan. Thanks for the update and sensing.

[thinden]

The attorney for the Foster family, James Hamilton, said the release of more photos would be damaging to the relatives, "invading their memory of a loved one, by subjecting them to harassment from any number of media outlets, and by leaving them vulnerable to the unwitting viewing of profoundly traumatic images."

the most "profoundly traumatic image" (to the gummit) might be the photograph of VWF's jaw showing the small calibre gunshot entry wound the mortician claims was there.

[nocuous]

bump

[nocuous]

bump