1 posted on
05/05/2003 11:58:42 AM PDT by
Brian S
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: Brian S
My benefits ran out.
Back in 75 I think it was. Can I still get an extension?
To: Brian S
She's everywhere, she's everywhere!!!!!!!!!
3 posted on
05/05/2003 12:04:08 PM PDT by
b4its2late
(I don't mind the rat race, but I could do with a little more cheese.)
To: Brian S
...which would provide relief to more than 4 (m) million workers hurt by the poor economy. Keep givin' 'em fish, but don't dare let 'em fish on their own - that way they'll "need" us.
To: Brian S
Dear Senator Clinton:
I am sure you are not one of the many who are allowing our great high tech job growth go overseas but since that topic is very hot here in United States lately, where there are no high tech jobs anymore, they are booming over in India , I was just wondering what would happen if other countries were to provide government services at a cheaper rate than we are getting here in the United States? Since our corporations believe they get more bang for the buck with foreign workers who pay the taxes to pay the salaries of all government officials, I wondered if we could outsource parts of the government for cheaper wages and knowing India and other countries, at least according to the talking heads of our corporations, we could get more bang for the buck and thus pay less in taxes. What do you think?
Sincerely,
To: Brian S
When AI was unemployed (8 months in 2001 and 2002) the *LAST* thing I wanted was an extension of my unemployment benefits.
I wanted a *JOB*!!!
Trust Hillery! to give the unemployed what they do not desire and avoid giving them what they really need.
8 posted on
05/05/2003 12:10:23 PM PDT by
No Truce With Kings
(The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
To: Brian S
I am sick to death of this so called woman. I wish she would go away. When I see her name my blood boils. The witch is out to ruin the country. Go away dumbo.
9 posted on
05/05/2003 12:11:06 PM PDT by
mom-7
To: Brian S
She wants to take credit for something that will happen anyway.
10 posted on
05/05/2003 12:11:47 PM PDT by
Consort
To: Brian S
Hillary's suddenly worried about the little bitty workers...how nice. Shame she wasn't worried about them while aiding and abbetting Daschle in obstructing the last unemployment extension, and funds for the NYFD along with other emergency fud=nding so she could blame it on the Bush administration along with all the rest of the party of rats.
Still waiting for her to throw her dirty little hat into the '04 presidential ring.
11 posted on
05/05/2003 12:12:46 PM PDT by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: Brian S
12 posted on
05/05/2003 12:14:31 PM PDT by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com)
To: Brian S
But, what about the deficit? How can this be the responsible thing to do? We have a war to pay for. Yadda, yadda, yadda.
Oh, I forgot this is democRAT social spending, so none of that stuff counts. Just as long as we are redistributing the wealth and not letting the ones that earned the money keep it, then this is OK.
19 posted on
05/05/2003 12:25:50 PM PDT by
w1andsodidwe
(I could never think like a demoncRAT)
To: Brian S
I was thinking about getting laid off, so does this mean I can draw unemployement for 39 months instead of 26 or the original 13?
Getting laid off isn't so bad after all, it keeps the democRAT voter employed.
To: Brian S
Someone should call on Hitlery to shut the f*%# up!
21 posted on
05/05/2003 12:30:35 PM PDT by
Free ThinkerNY
(((The Clintons are leading the Axis of Evil)))
To: Brian S
She wants an extension for her deadbeat presumed husband.
23 posted on
05/05/2003 12:38:15 PM PDT by
My2Cents
("Well....there you go again.")
To: Brian S
Isn't this an extension of the extension?
To: Brian S
Hitlery sounds like she's working overtime soliciting for the unions vote. She doesn't have to worry. Unions, as a majority, always vote RAT.
To: Brian S
OK, let me get this straight. Giving us OUR tax money back is bad for us economically, but giving OUR tax money to let people continue to not work is good?
26 posted on
05/05/2003 12:40:25 PM PDT by
manic4organic
(An organic conservative)
To: Brian S
28 posted on
05/05/2003 12:42:51 PM PDT by
SerpentDove
(Each post focus-group tested for maximum wallop.)
To: Brian S; All
Read my tagline...
33 posted on
05/05/2003 1:14:49 PM PDT by
backhoe
("It's so easy to spend someone else's money..." ( My Dad ))
To: ALOHA RONNIE
Hillary, Hillary
Always Hillary
To: Brian S
This is getting really old!! Congress pushed throught extension of benefits at the very 1st of the year(does anybody remember Hillery's antics then?. I want my Permanent Tax Cut, Marriage tax penalty relief ant My increase in the Child tax credit first!!!
49 posted on
05/05/2003 1:57:06 PM PDT by
CPT Clay
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson