Survey results Does President Bush owe you an explanation about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?

Billoreilly.com ^ | 5/06/03 | Bill Oreilly

[UB355]

Q: Does President Bush owe you an explanation about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? Answer Percent No 71% Yes 29%

Total Votes: 24802*

[UB355]

link bad

www.billoreilly.com

[RLK]

Answer: Yes, but I'm not going to get it.

[tuna_battle_slight_return]

O'Reilly just went over this five minutes ago. He was shocked at the results. He believes Bush does owe an explanation if WMD are not found.

[billbears]

bump. I may even have to watch O'Reilly to see the results. Haven't watched the man for months. He is irritating.

[gunnedah]

All of a sudden Bill thinks America has appointed him GOD!
He is bordering on becoming ridiculous.

[Jean S]

Haven't watched the man for months. He is irritating.

Same here. My husband is watching him now, that's why I'm on my computer.

[billbears]

And you don't? Better check the State of the Union address Bush gave in January. His one and only reason was that if Hussein did not disarm. Mind you, he gave side effects that would be good for the people of Iraq, but he clearly stated it was to disarm Hussein

We will consult. But let there be no misunderstanding: If Saddam Hussein does not fully disarm, for the safety of our people and for the peace of the world, we will lead a coalition to disarm him--State of the Union

Note he doesn't say for regime change, he doesn't say for freeing Iraqis, he doesn't say the Army of these US would go for any other reason but to disarm Hussein.

If O'Reilly calls him on this I'll be suprised and maybe it would add for me a notch of respect for him

[billbears]

No he actually may be showing a conservative streak, instead of a nationalist/populist streak I've seen on him for so long

[ReaganRevolution]

Please. He only owes an explanation if we leave Iraq without finding anything. I fully expect in the weeks and months ahead that the military will find plenty.

[Alberta's Child]

Does President Bush owe you an explanation about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?

In a word, YES.

[OldFriend]

O'Reilly is running a close second to Geraldo for the most annoying, self aggradizing person on FNC.

[Political Junkie Too]

I'll accept evidence of chemical dumpings, if not the chemicals themselves.

Some questions that I have:

1. Why did we find so many empty barrels? Could the contents have been dumped in the Euphrates? And why so many chemical suits and masks?

2. Why did we hear so many initial reports of field tests indicating the presence of chemicals in empty barrels and shells but later lab tests denied those reports? How could we be so precise with our missile technology yet 100% wrong with our parts per million devices in the field? Or maybe the labs are downplaying something?

-PJ

[OldFriend]

make that aggraNdizing!

[ZDaphne]

Not really. As my brother says, Saddam needed his ass kicked anyway.

[Nagual]

The job is done. WMD don't matter.

I just want to know which one is next.

Go Dubya.

[chiller]

Sure you will....from us.

There are soooooo many pieces of evidence that indicate WMD I don't know where to begin. Traces of anthrax...ya' find those laying around almost anywhere, wouldn't you agree?

Saddam had months and months to move, bury, ship to Syria, all kinds of stuff.

And then there's the Salman Pak airliners and the al Qaeda connection.

O'Reilly's poll results typify dominant thought in the US. Saddam was a slime who: has, or had, or sold, or was making lots of nasty WMD's. Not to mention all the ingredients.

[hgro]

O'Reilly spent a lot of time ranting about an all white prom in a mixed race high school in Alabama (?). It may not have been a good thing to do but O'Reilly wanted Governor Perdue to come on O'Reilly's program and apologize for it happening.

O'Reilly is out after ratings and nothing else and he obviously doesn't care how he gets them.

[TLBSHOW]

No President Bush does not owe anyone an explanation on this matter.

[fight_truth_decay]

It was documented Saddam did have WMD. With all the paperwork/records now found, I find it strange Saddam couldn't come up with documentation of their destruction.

f_t_d